|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 65 responses total. |
other
|
|
response 25 of 65:
|
Feb 18 19:20 UTC 2006 |
In English, however, minutiae ARE more important than substance.
|
davel
|
|
response 26 of 65:
|
Feb 18 20:23 UTC 2006 |
Right, Eric.
|
keesan
|
|
response 27 of 65:
|
Feb 18 20:42 UTC 2006 |
So did we ever get off the blacklists?
|
mary
|
|
response 28 of 65:
|
Feb 18 22:19 UTC 2006 |
We probably won't be off the blacklists until we find a way to
be sure newusers won't be able to spam-a-lot from Grex. But
this in NO WAY means we turned off mail because of being blacklisted.
Having trouble keeping up? See Eric. He rules. ;-)
|
cross
|
|
response 29 of 65:
|
Feb 19 18:35 UTC 2006 |
You can usually get off those blacklists as soon as you stop spamming. Since
new users can't send email, and the plethora of ``sleeper accounts'' is being
cut down on, it would seem logical that grex will be getting off of more and
more of these blacklists as time passes (either by expiration due to time
without a complaint, or someone finding out about said blacklist and taking
the time to contact the list administrator). Enough suggestions have been
made to raise the barrier to getting email access sufficiently to make it
largely a non-issue. All that needs to be done is to implement them. Bruce
Howard has already done some of that.
I don't understand why people think it's such a big deal that they feel
compelled to say, ``this in NO WAY means we turned off mail because of being
blacklisted.'' I mean, why not? Being blacklisted was one of the means by
which grex found out about the problem of inordinate spam being sent from grex
(I don't think anyone was paying attention to the mail queue; this problem's
been going on for months with no action until recently. Particularly until
the blacklisting started happening and people started saying, ``hey, my mail
is bouncing with this blacklist message...'' at which someone said, ``holy
SHIT we're sending out a lot of spam!'' This is what I mean when I say that
the two are isomorphic). It is, therefore, one of the reasons grex decided to
do something about the spam. Thus, it is one of the reasons why grex decided
to turn off mail.
What's the big deal about that? You people act like it's somehow Bad if
that's the case. Why?
|
keesan
|
|
response 30 of 65:
|
Feb 19 18:53 UTC 2006 |
Is there any progress on setting a maximum number of outgoing mails per day
per account so that new users can send out mail again?
|
slynne
|
|
response 31 of 65:
|
Feb 23 14:31 UTC 2006 |
It is funny because I thought we were turning off email both because of
being blacklisted and because it was important to us not to be a source
of spam so we could be a good member of the internet community.
|
sholmes
|
|
response 32 of 65:
|
Feb 23 15:17 UTC 2006 |
why did the chicken cross the road ?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 33 of 65:
|
Feb 23 17:42 UTC 2006 |
How do you know the chicken crossed the road? Couldn't the road have
just as easily moved underneath the chicken? The the chicken did in
fact, cross the road, what reference points would it have to know that
it was the object in motion?
|
sholmes
|
|
response 34 of 65:
|
Feb 23 18:13 UTC 2006 |
argh now i am not even sure if it was a chicken.
|
naftee
|
|
response 35 of 65:
|
Feb 23 21:55 UTC 2006 |
probably a cat.
|
perch
|
|
response 36 of 65:
|
Mar 12 18:52 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
perch
|
|
response 37 of 65:
|
Mar 12 18:55 UTC 2006 |
Woops, didn't mean to erase the last message.
I just joined, but since I can't send or receive mail, there's nothing
else for me to do except post chicken crossing messages.
To show the deer how to do it.
The New York City Police say,
"You give me five minutes with the chicken and I'll find out."
BILLY GRAHAM: And God said unto the chicken, "Thou shalt cross the
road." And the chicken crossed the road, and there was much rejoicing.
Hemingway: He crossed the road. To die. In the rain.
Martin Luther King, Jr. said: I see a world where all chickens will be
free to cross roads and no one will ask why?
Einstein: Why did the atoms cross the road? Because it was time to
split! Get it? Time to split!! Atoms!
Bill Clinton: To the best of my recollection, that chicken did not
engage in what I would call "road crossing behavior."
|
keesan
|
|
response 38 of 65:
|
Mar 12 22:49 UTC 2006 |
Have you tried receiving mail? I think it is just outgoing mail that is
blocked, which means you can send mail to other grexers. Feel free to email
me. Since the staff do not appear to be even working on a way to block
spammers by restricting the number of mails new users can send out each day,
they might be willing to grant you outgoing mail privileges if you ask nicely,
as the first such case. I doubt that a real spammer would bother posting
silly jokes - maybe we should make that a requirement for mail privileges.
|
perch
|
|
response 39 of 65:
|
Mar 14 06:18 UTC 2006 |
I've just discovered a way to send mail from my new user account even
though it's supposedly blocked. I wonder how long before spammers
exploit the weakness.
-perch
|
spooked
|
|
response 40 of 65:
|
Mar 14 09:37 UTC 2006 |
I'm no Java specialist, by the way. Though, I can confidently say that
from the majority of respondees so far, I have more experience in Java
development and technologies.
|
keesan
|
|
response 41 of 65:
|
Mar 14 14:56 UTC 2006 |
I could send mail by a process involving telnet, I forget how. I think I
somehow telnetted to my ISPs mail server. But non-members don't have telnet
privileges.
Hey staff, can we give perch outgoing email now that he knows how to get
around the block anyway?
|
perch
|
|
response 42 of 65:
|
Mar 14 18:49 UTC 2006 |
I've been experimenting to see how much I can do and right now nothing
works. No mail coming or going. Not even to other people on grex. Can't
even mail to myself.
Is it just my account or does everyone have email problems?
Do I need to post more jokes to get things working?
-perch
|
keesan
|
|
response 43 of 65:
|
Mar 14 19:59 UTC 2006 |
I got mail from you, perch, and I answered it. What mail program(s) have you
tried for reading your mail?
There is no need to sign your posts with your login - it appears on line one
(using picospan).
|
naftee
|
|
response 44 of 65:
|
Mar 14 21:06 UTC 2006 |
hi perch !
don't listen to keesan ; you can sign your posts as you wish !
-naftee le magnifique
|
perch
|
|
response 45 of 65:
|
Mar 15 03:51 UTC 2006 |
No mail. I use pine but also checked my /var/mail/ file and it's empty,
except for the sytem generated message. I even tried sending mail to
myself from grex and it didn't work.
I sort of feel signing the post ends it. Otherwise I feel like I just
stopped in the
|
keesan
|
|
response 46 of 65:
|
Mar 15 03:57 UTC 2006 |
Grex mail goes to some place nonstandard, I forget where. If you are not
getting mail that I sent you or that you sent yourself, the staff ought to
look into the problem. They were only supposed to disable mail going out of
grex, not even mail coming into grex, for new users.
|
keesan
|
|
response 47 of 65:
|
Mar 15 04:01 UTC 2006 |
You were right, there is a /var/mail/perch, and if I send you a mail the size
of that file does not increase, whereas /var/mail/keesan gets larger if I
write to myself. I hope staff reads this item soon and fixes this problem
(and gives you outgoing mail privileges).
|
perch
|
|
response 48 of 65:
|
Mar 15 04:40 UTC 2006 |
keesan, lost your mail. But I'm getting things straightened out. Just
left out a " in one configuration file.
|
naftee
|
|
response 49 of 65:
|
Mar 15 04:49 UTC 2006 |
ocean perch is mighty good fish; wouldn't you agree ?
|