You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-118      
 
Author Message
25 new of 118 responses total.
keesan
response 25 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 23:14 UTC 2006

I decline, I think remmers and janc would do a much better job.  I will
nominate myself if we ever finish building the house we started in 1986.
tod
response 26 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 00:15 UTC 2006

I can relate!
bhoward
response 27 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 01:05 UTC 2006

Dang.  20 years?  Are you growing your own trees for the wood
you need?
nharmon
response 28 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 03:04 UTC 2006

Hey, there are buildings that took 20 years to build. Egyptian pyramids
come to mind.
keesan
response 29 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 04:00 UTC 2006

Monticello took a lot longer.  We are spending too much time on the design,
and we also started by digging a hole which then caved in, and building the
foundation of recycled blocks including some from the old county building,
and as much recycled wood as people were throwing out near us, and the goal
is to heat with electricity for $100/year (or maybe with stored potatoes and
apples).  We have visited people in newer houses than this one.  
tod
response 30 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 18:20 UTC 2006

A man's home is his castle..and in some cases a few of us actually have a
castle.  You don't DIY overnight.
albaugh
response 31 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 19:31 UTC 2006

Aquinas is better...  ;-)
cross
response 32 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 23:47 UTC 2006

A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man
contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.
                -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
tod
response 33 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 23:51 UTC 2006

I outta take this microphone and beat ya over the head with it, cuz that's
what you deserve.  That's what you deserve!!
                -- Charles Manson to the judge at his sentencing
happyboy
response 34 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 09:49 UTC 2006

"Puppycow Appleshoe."
  ---Koo Koo
remmers
response 35 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 14:45 UTC 2006

Did the Board set dates for the election?
aruba
response 36 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 10:15 UTC 2006

The board decided to start the election on Monday the 23rd.  Sorry that
hasn't been posted in coop before now.
remmers
response 37 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 12:54 UTC 2006

Okay.  I guess nominations and opportunities for acceptance end at
midnight tonight (Sunday) then.  I'll open the voting as early as
practical on Monday, when I know the complete list of candidates.  I
presume that plan is to keep the polls open for 15 days, the same as in
a regular election.

If nobody else accepts a nomination, it looks like this will be another
non-competitive election -- 2 candidates, 2 slots.

I seem to be in the position of both administering the election and
being a candidate.  This has happened before, and the way that it was
handled was to have a second person count the votes.  It's kind of moot
if there's no competition, but still it would be nice if another staff
member who's not a candidate handles the election after I've done the
initial setup.  There's not much to "handling it" - poll opening and
closing is now automated, so about the only thing the administrator has
to do is tally the results when the election is over.  It's pretty
simple to do via a script.

Any volunteers?
spooked
response 38 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 22:11 UTC 2006

I'll count the votes.
naftee
response 39 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 01:37 UTC 2006

how's your sperm count ?
happyboy
response 40 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 02:01 UTC 2006



        i have seven!
scholar
response 41 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 11:51 UTC 2006

I have many, many spermatazoa because my testicles are huge.
remmers
response 42 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 16:03 UTC 2006

Re #38:  Thanks, Mic.  I'll be in touch via email regarding procedures.

The polls are open, now through February 6.  It's a non-competitive election,
but you should vote anyway.  Type 'vote' at a Unix shell prompt, '!vote' at
most other prompts, or vote on the web at
https://grex.org/cgi-bin/pw/voting-booth .
keesan
response 43 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 16:48 UTC 2006

I read Jan's statement (Remmer's did not provide one yet) and wonder why there
is mention of setting up the Sun but nothing about all his hard work getting
the current grex hardware running.  Remmers did a lot of work on current grex
too, and it is really generous of them to also agree to run for board.
aruba
response 44 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 18:20 UTC 2006

Jan's statement is from the last time he ran for the board, which was a
while ago.
happyboy
response 45 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 18:30 UTC 2006

re41:  oh, did they finally descend?  congrats!
remmers
response 46 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 18:35 UTC 2006

I've emailed Jan suggesting that he update his statement.  And I'll
provide one of my own.
naftee
response 47 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 21:19 UTC 2006

john remmers doesn't have a voting statement :(
kingjon
response 48 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 21:23 UTC 2006

Amd isn't there usually a time period between the closing of nominations
 and the opening of the voting, to allow the people who haven't seen
their  nomination to be contacted and asked to accept or decline?
aruba
response 49 of 118: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 23:03 UTC 2006

Yes, there normally is such a period.  Since this is a special election, and
there had already been a long nomination period, the board decided to start
the election a week after our meeting (which was Monday the 16th.)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-118      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss