|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 115 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 25 of 115:
| 
Feb 9 21:50 UTC 2004 |
I'm willing to become a member to vote yes on this proposal.
($$$$$$$$$$)
|
tod
|
|
response 26 of 115:
|
Feb 9 23:05 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 27 of 115:
|
Feb 9 23:31 UTC 2004 |
think of the money -- $$$$$
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 28 of 115:
|
Feb 9 23:58 UTC 2004 |
resp:25 I'm almost willing. (I'm just cheap, and poor.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 29 of 115:
|
Feb 10 00:13 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 30 of 115:
|
Feb 10 01:07 UTC 2004 |
Right; no votes are required to bring the matter to a vote.
|
md
|
|
response 31 of 115:
|
Feb 10 01:07 UTC 2004 |
Jamie, sooner or later you're gonna have to face the fact that your
resolution got voted down because you're the one who proposed it.
Silly and irrational but no different than US political elections,
which always end up being popularity contests. I think it's healthy
for you to learn this lesson again (and again, and again), so I hope
the Grexers That Be will allow your new resolution to stand.
|
jp2
|
|
response 32 of 115:
|
Feb 10 01:17 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 33 of 115:
|
Feb 10 01:53 UTC 2004 |
The sad thing is, all they did was show SPAM works. Now THAT'S a punishment!
|
happyboy
|
|
response 34 of 115:
|
Feb 10 09:19 UTC 2004 |
would anyone like a gourmet jellybean?
THE PINA COLADA ONES ARE GOOD.
|
russ
|
|
response 35 of 115:
|
Feb 10 12:54 UTC 2004 |
I predict that the proposal-barrage by jp2 will result in
many people (including some board members) forgetting his
items and only taking notice if something comes to a vote,
so they can vote it down.
Kind of like chronic abusers in party getting the :forget treatment.
|
remmers
|
|
response 36 of 115:
|
Feb 10 13:12 UTC 2004 |
I voted for the proposal the first time too. So it lost. Far from the
first time I've been on the losing side. When I lose, I try to be a
good sport about it and move on.
If jp2 insists on bringing this misguided rerun to a vote, I think that
the result will be a mechanism that prevents misguided reruns.
|
jp2
|
|
response 37 of 115:
|
Feb 10 13:16 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
ryan
|
|
response 38 of 115:
|
Feb 10 14:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 39 of 115:
|
Feb 10 14:20 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 40 of 115:
|
Feb 10 16:17 UTC 2004 |
I remember this same argument coming up when the question of closing the
censor log was brought up for the second time.
|
ryan
|
|
response 41 of 115:
|
Feb 10 19:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
ryan
|
|
response 42 of 115:
|
Feb 10 19:20 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 43 of 115:
|
Feb 10 21:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 44 of 115:
|
Feb 10 22:02 UTC 2004 |
Actually, there are two different classes: GreXers who know they are right
and do something about it, and GreXers who know they are right but sit around
and take the shit from the first category.
|
bookie
|
|
response 45 of 115:
|
Feb 11 01:24 UTC 2004 |
Seems to me ONE vote should suffice. This effort is of the 'keep bringing it
up until it passes' category.
|
gull
|
|
response 46 of 115:
|
Feb 11 03:59 UTC 2004 |
That's what people said about the censor log, too. And that did pass
after a couple of iterations.
|
rational
|
|
response 47 of 115:
|
Feb 11 04:13 UTC 2004 |
jp2's right.
|
styles
|
|
response 48 of 115:
|
Feb 11 04:38 UTC 2004 |
#34: HOW CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 49 of 115:
|
Feb 11 06:47 UTC 2004 |
resp:34 I'll have a pina colada jellybean.
|