|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 123 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 25 of 123:
| 
Apr 19 19:54 UTC 2001 |
My problem is that I could not find an easy way to inquire about
Grex, Grex memberships, and Grex dues, in agora. There should be
a file somewhere that can be called up by just typing any of
dues, member*, Grex, and maybe just help, at an Ok: prompt.
(help member and help membership, don't help either)
|
tpryan
|
|
response 26 of 123:
|
Apr 19 21:30 UTC 2001 |
I guess !support is not intuitive?
|
other
|
|
response 27 of 123:
|
Apr 19 22:23 UTC 2001 |
Tim, it might not be, and aliasing the others to it wouldn't hurt.
|
aruba
|
|
response 28 of 123:
|
Apr 19 23:09 UTC 2001 |
We could alias "member" and "membership" to !support. Dunno about help -
That gives you Picospan help, and it may not be possible to edit that.
Anyone know?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 29 of 123:
|
Apr 20 05:49 UTC 2001 |
Funny thing is, I used to know !support was for Grex info, but had
completely forgotten it. Could it be enabled without the bang? I
notice several other common commands don't require the bang, and
the bang itself is not intuitive.
|
aruba
|
|
response 30 of 123:
|
Apr 20 13:47 UTC 2001 |
It is enabled without the bang.
|
wh
|
|
response 31 of 123:
|
Apr 21 01:54 UTC 2001 |
I agree with aruba it would be a good idea to alias
member and membership. If someone has been on Grex
for a few months and is curious, we want to catch
them the most likely places they might look for
membership information.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 32 of 123:
|
Apr 23 20:54 UTC 2001 |
Dialins being real finicky. 3451 connects but doesnt give me "Welcome to
Grex". 3554 rings 3 times and rolls over to a line that doesn't answer.
3000 doesn't connect at all. Finally got here via 5041
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 33 of 123:
|
Apr 25 02:48 UTC 2001 |
Dialed every single number without being able to get one to answer and
connect. Not even the pseudo connection with no welcome line.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 34 of 123:
|
Apr 25 21:15 UTC 2001 |
grex.org and [grex.]cyberspace.org are all refusing telnet connections
at this moment. I'm obviously able to Backtalk instead...
|
goose
|
|
response 35 of 123:
|
Apr 25 21:46 UTC 2001 |
I got one refusal from my desk in CA, and then I came in through my wccnet
account and it worked fine.
|
carson
|
|
response 36 of 123:
|
Apr 25 22:26 UTC 2001 |
(Krj reports that inetd failed. STeve kicked it, and it's working
OK now. Grex was refusing telnet sessions, but accepted ssh.)
|
senna
|
|
response 37 of 123:
|
Apr 25 23:35 UTC 2001 |
I've been having trouble with telnets all day.
|
keesan
|
|
response 38 of 123:
|
Apr 25 23:37 UTC 2001 |
I got two 'NO CARRIER' about 20 minutes ago but now got through by dialin.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 39 of 123:
|
Apr 26 00:37 UTC 2001 |
Some of my inbound mail bounced today.
|
telnet
|
|
response 40 of 123:
|
Apr 26 03:37 UTC 2001 |
Who invented telnet? Or did it invent itself?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 41 of 123:
|
Apr 26 04:56 UTC 2001 |
Here's a guess, from INDEX.rfc, which I obtained on August 24, 2000:
0097 First Cut at a Proposed Telnet Protocol. J.T. Melvin, R.W.
Watson. Feb-15-1971. (Not online) (Status: UNKNOWN)
0137 Telnet Protocol - a proposed document. T.C. O'Sullivan.
Apr-30-1971. (Not online) (Updated by RFC0139) (Status: UNKNOWN)
0139 Discussion of Telnet Protocol. T.C. O'Sullivan. May-07-1971. (Not
online) (Updates RFC0137) (Updated by RFC0158) (Also RFC393) (Status:
UNKNOWN)
0158 Telnet Protocol: A Proposed Document. T.C. O'Sullivan.
May-19-1971. (Not online) (Obsoleted by RFC0495) (Updates RFC0139)
(Updated by RFC0318) (Also RFC393) (Status: UNKNOWN)
0206 User Telnet - description of an initial implementation. J.E.
White. Aug-09-1971. (Not online) (Status: UNKNOWN)
0215 NCP, ICP, and Telnet: The Terminal IMP implementation. A.M.
McKenzie. Aug-30-1971. (Format: TXT=16645 bytes) (Status: UNKNOWN)
0318 Telnet Protocols. J. Postel. Apr-03-1972. (Format: TXT=34928
bytes) (Updates RFC0158) (Updated by RFC0435) (Also RFC0139, RFC0158)
(Status: UNKNOWN)
(And lots more)
Looking at a copy of INDEX.std, dated 3 Jun 1999, it seems the protocol
was finally standardised more than ten years later:
0008 Telnet Protocol. J. Postel, J. Reynolds. May 1983. (Format:
TXT=44639 bytes) (Also RFC0854, RFC0855)
Note that the first group are RFCs, while the last is STD 0008.
|
russ
|
|
response 42 of 123:
|
Apr 27 19:44 UTC 2001 |
I dialed in on -3000 and tried to download using sz. I wound up
on the modem with defective flow control; the download went like
a bat out of hell for 4 blocks and then it froze. When I dumped
out of rz I found I'd been disconnected.
|
russ
|
|
response 43 of 123:
|
Apr 29 05:16 UTC 2001 |
Login Name TTY Idle Login Time Location Work Phone
mdw Marcus D Watts *u9 2d Apr 12 16:29
newuser The Newuser Program p0 11d Apr 17 13:10
... should be self-explanatory.
|
jep
|
|
response 44 of 123:
|
May 6 21:40 UTC 2001 |
I can't log in through Backtalk, but can telnet in fine.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 45 of 123:
|
May 7 11:21 UTC 2001 |
I have not been able to send mail for about 24 hours...it keeps coming up as
"Sending error 552: My skin is black upon me, and my bon"
Unfortunately, this is mail that I realy need to get out. :(
Am I the only one with this issue?
|
i
|
|
response 46 of 123:
|
May 8 16:09 UTC 2001 |
Peeking at www.imc.org/rfc2821 (which i'm pretty sure is the right place),
it looks like "552" means that "mail action aborted: exceeded storage
allocation". I'd guess that the recipient's mailbox is full.
|
scg
|
|
response 47 of 123:
|
May 8 19:59 UTC 2001 |
If I had to guess from the text, I'd say it's one of Marcus's anti-spam
defences.
|
gull
|
|
response 48 of 123:
|
May 8 20:09 UTC 2001 |
I thought the anti-spam filters only affected incoming mail.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 49 of 123:
|
May 8 23:32 UTC 2001 |
And it wasn't going to anybody on this system....
|
