|
Grex > Coop11 > #38: Nominations for the Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 126 responses total. |
mdw
|
|
response 25 of 126:
| 
Nov 5 22:53 UTC 1998 |
We've gone through ROR before, no need to rehash dead horses here.
|
scg
|
|
response 26 of 126:
|
Nov 5 23:26 UTC 1998 |
re 24:
The time for the board meetings is not set in stone. If a board member
can't make it to meetings because of the time, it would make sense to change
the meeting time.
|
other
|
|
response 27 of 126:
|
Nov 5 23:36 UTC 1998 |
re #25: We *could rehash dead horses here, but now it's illegal to do it in
California...
|
janc
|
|
response 28 of 126:
|
Nov 6 03:00 UTC 1998 |
Agree strongly with resp:24. Weekend evenings would be possible for
board meetings.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 29 of 126:
|
Nov 6 15:18 UTC 1998 |
Okay, I could work that out. =)
|
remmers
|
|
response 30 of 126:
|
Nov 7 00:24 UTC 1998 |
I accept the nomination. Thanks, Scott and Eric.
|
davel
|
|
response 31 of 126:
|
Nov 7 01:05 UTC 1998 |
I also think that it would be bad for the board to become
non-technically-able, but very good to have some members of the board who are
not technically oriented. Sindi, IMNAAHO you should reconsider.
(I also note that we're using "technical" in a somewhat limited sense.
Sindi's translation work is surely quite technical at times, for example.)
|
dpc
|
|
response 32 of 126:
|
Nov 7 01:14 UTC 1998 |
I would also support Sindi's candidacy, as a fellow non-techie.
|
keesan
|
|
response 33 of 126:
|
Nov 7 21:30 UTC 1998 |
I nominate Dave Lovelace and David Cahill for board members. I will be happy
to attend an occasional meeting but really do not know enough to make
decisions (i. e., vote). My technical expertise is in things like pharmacy,
chemistry, and botany, I don't even understand many of the words used in this
conference. I don't know what an IC is.
(Or what part of speech it is).
|
davel
|
|
response 34 of 126:
|
Nov 8 00:02 UTC 1998 |
I decline, for reasons too many to name, but thanks anyway, Sindi.
|
remmers
|
|
response 35 of 126:
|
Nov 8 11:44 UTC 1998 |
Re resp:33 - IC is the name of the company that used to provide our
internet connection.
|
remmers
|
|
response 36 of 126:
|
Nov 8 11:55 UTC 1998 |
People accepting nominations so far are, in order of acceptance:
Jan Wolter (janc)
Eric Bassey (other)
Jennifer Kriegel (jiffer)
John Remmers (remmers)
In addition, STeve Andre (steve) and Colleen McGee (cmcgee) have been
nominated but have not yet either accepted or declined.
Nominations close on Sunday, November 15. That's one week from today.
|
robh
|
|
response 37 of 126:
|
Nov 8 12:54 UTC 1998 |
I believe Dave Cahill was nominated back in #33, but has not
accepted or declined yet.
|
remmers
|
|
response 38 of 126:
|
Nov 8 21:27 UTC 1998 |
That's correct. Sorry for the omission.
|
dpc
|
|
response 39 of 126:
|
Nov 9 19:05 UTC 1998 |
I accept the nomination.
|
jep
|
|
response 40 of 126:
|
Nov 9 19:59 UTC 1998 |
Dave Cahill has been an excellent Board member for Arbornet.
|
scott
|
|
response 41 of 126:
|
Nov 9 20:27 UTC 1998 |
(I've emailed several people to see if they are willing to be nominated)
|
steve
|
|
response 42 of 126:
|
Nov 12 05:06 UTC 1998 |
Oops. Shoulda read #6 more closely. I accept.
|
mdw
|
|
response 43 of 126:
|
Nov 12 07:47 UTC 1998 |
(grex is not much like arbornet. vive la difference!)
|
mta
|
|
response 44 of 126:
|
Nov 12 14:21 UTC 1998 |
resp:42 Cool!
|
valerie
|
|
response 45 of 126:
|
Nov 12 17:34 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
mziemba
|
|
response 46 of 126:
|
Nov 12 21:04 UTC 1998 |
I accept Valerie's nomination, and look forward to running with a fine group
of candidates.
|
davel
|
|
response 47 of 126:
|
Nov 13 02:27 UTC 1998 |
'Fraid I second, third, whatever, my declination. I would be a poor choice,
on several grounds.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 48 of 126:
|
Nov 13 03:24 UTC 1998 |
I'm waiting to respond, because I may get an assignment that keeps me out of
town a lot. I'll let you know early next week.
|
other
|
|
response 49 of 126:
|
Nov 14 06:04 UTC 1998 |
i second mziemba. this could get interesting... :):)
|