|
Grex > Coop10 > #117: Cyberspace Communications, Inc. finances through 6/30/98 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 62 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 25 of 62:
|
Jul 9 01:09 UTC 1998 |
OK, somebody please start the quarterly M-net item.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 26 of 62:
|
Jul 9 04:27 UTC 1998 |
Again - life memberships are a *donation* to help insure the future of
the system. They are not a "risk". They *reduce* risk.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 27 of 62:
|
Jul 9 04:29 UTC 1998 |
(That is, if Grex created Life Memberships.)
|
janc
|
|
response 28 of 62:
|
Jul 9 05:56 UTC 1998 |
A lifetime membership could be handled two way:
- invest it. It will earn annual income which can be used to help run
the system.
- spend it. Or rather, invest it in your own system, with the hopes that
it will lead to a larger income base in the future.
Either method is sound. $1200 today really can equal $60 a year forever,
if invested well.
I don't think I'd have a problem with lifetime memberships. I think creating
them would require a bylaw amendment, which requires a membership vote. Quite
a lot of trouble to go through to create a membership catagory that I think
would have no takers (well, could happen).
All I know about the donor is that they have asked to be anonymous. Playing
guessing games is inappropriate. The least we can do when someone gives us
a lot of money is to respect their request for anonymity. Making guesses on
line as in #21 has the potential of putting the actual donor in a position
where they must either lie or have their anonymity compromised. This is rude
in the extreme, so I decline to deny Richard's guess, even at risk of
encouraging people to believe that subtracting the cost of taxes, a house,
and a baby from the incomes of two part-time consultants leaves behind a lot
of spare cash.
|
kittie
|
|
response 29 of 62:
|
Jul 9 16:23 UTC 1998 |
If M-Net didn't have a bunch of snotty stuck up jerks, they'd have a LOT more
people and money coming in... M-Net is evil
|
other
|
|
response 30 of 62:
|
Jul 9 17:34 UTC 1998 |
I hereby propose:
That the bylaws of Cyberspace Communications be amended to include a
category of membership called "Lifetime Membership" with all rights,
privileges and responsibilities being equal to that of a regular
member, except that a "Lifetime Membership" cannot expire. The
cost of said "Lifetime Membership" shall be a multiple of the
annual membership rate to be determined by a vote of the board of
directors of Cyberspace Communications, and the dues revenue from
such memberships shall be invested or included in the general fund
as determined by the treasurer.
The reference to rights, privileges and responsibilities assures that in case
of abuse of the system, vandalism or other offensive action, Grex retains the
right to refund dues and eliminate an account, even though the membership
cannot expire. Discussion?
|
jep
|
|
response 31 of 62:
|
Jul 9 18:48 UTC 1998 |
In principle I think a lifetime membership contribution level is a good
idea. I have a few points which I think should be considered before it
is implemented.
What if the membership rate changes? It is possible it will change
radically. Grex might go to an hourly rate, for example. What happens
to the lifetime members? Also, Grex might implement different rate
structures.
Arbornet went to some pains to make sure any lifetime patrons would
always have the highest level of privileges available to anyone. If we
had ever gotten really wealthy, and purchased CompuServe, I believe
M-Net lifetime patrons would have gotten free, unlimited access to all
of it's services that were available to the public.
I believe there should be no guarantees, such as refunds. I think it
should be made clear that lifetime members are subject to the same
rules, conditions and expectations as any others. They are making a
contribution, and they are getting a privilege, and the two are
independent. I don't know if anyone has ever requested (or received) a
refund from Grex. I haven't heard of anyone doing either.
There are probably at least a dozen people who could be considered
deserving of being awarded a lifetime membership. How about allowing
the Board to make such awards? (I bet this point is going to fail
miserably, because it doesn't seem to be in keeping with the Grex
culture, but at least it can be considered.)
|
mary
|
|
response 32 of 62:
|
Jul 9 18:55 UTC 1998 |
I would like to see an example of how this money could be
invested to make 5% before considering a change in policy.
In order to get 5% in most investments you either have to
have a whole lot of money involved (jumbo accounts) or
a reasonable amount of money (thousands) tied up for
a long time. Are there others ways to have a small amount
of money safe and returning 5% and yet available and managed
without a lot of fees?
|
jared
|
|
response 33 of 62:
|
Jul 9 20:03 UTC 1998 |
You can easily get a return of 3.5% w/ $2500 at a bank, in a 7 day CD
|
richard
|
|
response 34 of 62:
|
Jul 9 21:52 UTC 1998 |
#28...geez, all I was saying was that the person deserves
gratitude and compliments for buying a 10-year membership.,
I wasnt aware that buying such a membership was such an awful
thing that he/she wouldnt want anyone to know about it?
I bet grex would get more such memberships if it was 501(3)(c) and
they were tax-deductable. Maynbe an incentive to go that route.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 35 of 62:
|
Jul 10 04:49 UTC 1998 |
This is the ...finances....item. A proposal to amend the bylaws would be
better put forward in its own item
#30 does not offer a bylaw amendment per se, but is just a discussion
item. If anyone wants to propose a bylaw amendment, it should be worded
as are the bylaws, and its location identified by sectin/article.
Having the board choose the "multiple" is the same as the board choosing
the amount. It is simpler to choose the amount. Since the board sets
the dues, they might wish to raise (or lower - heh) one or the other or
both.
It is not necessary to specify that a Life Membership will not expire. That
is the understood meaning of Life Membership. Actually, Life Membership
is only for the lifetime of a member - it is not desirable to continue
the Life Membership of an expired member.
It is sufficient to state that the Life Membership dues will be set by
the board (they take all fiscal actions by vote).
I consider it very desirable if Life Memberships are created, that a
portion of the life membership that will return annually in interest the
regular annual dues be immediately deposited to an endowment. The endowment
can be held by the corporation, perhaps until it is large enough that it
can be deposited to the Ann Arbor Community Foundation, where it will earn
5% *and* donations to it would be in part Michigan tax credits. Otherwise
there is a great danger in spending Life Membership income on current
expenses, conceivably leading to an inability to pay operating costs in
support of those memberships.
|
other
|
|
response 36 of 62:
|
Jul 10 06:15 UTC 1998 |
my point was really to formally create a life membership with the proviso that
the board, not the membership, determine the fee amount and the disposition
of the revenue. that seemed appropriate to me.
|
senna
|
|
response 37 of 62:
|
Jul 10 07:51 UTC 1998 |
Would we really get more money with tax deductables? It's certainly nice for
people who have made the donation, but I don't think it's the deciding factor.
Can we hear from people who have decided *not* to donate before making that
assumption?
Mnet is 501(3)(c). How are the donations doing over there?
|
remmers
|
|
response 38 of 62:
|
Jul 10 12:15 UTC 1998 |
Re #30: Eric, to make a bylaw amendment proposal "official", you
should enter it as a new item in the Coop conference. Then it can
discussed and ultimately voted on by the membership. See the
bylaws (item 2 in Coop) for details on how this works.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 39 of 62:
|
Jul 10 15:05 UTC 1998 |
See the bylaws also to determine the placement and appropriate style of
wording of a new section/article/paragraph.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 40 of 62:
|
Jul 10 19:39 UTC 1998 |
Other than the paragraph or two that says 'thank you' here is
some of the wording I got in the letter from the Michigan Tech Fund:
This letter serves as your offical receipt for tax purposes; please save it
for your records.
Federal lax law requires us to inform you that Michigan Tech did not provide
you with any good or services in whole or in partial consideration for your
contribution. YOur contribution is tax deductible for federal income tax.
Regular membership/dues may be considered as receiving something
in return (voting rights, internet features) here on Grex. I would guess
that only an outright donation (cash or say, auction items) would be
tax deductible. It does seem right that the donation can have a
purpose; be it hardware fund, general operations or silly hat fund.
When I got my letter back from National Space Society, it
stated that $10 of the $25 i sent was for my subscription to the
Ad Astra magazine, the remaining $15 is tax deductable.
Looks like we need to gather up our collective experiences
with 501(c)3 types of organizations of all sizes to help Mark get a
handle of how best to implement his systems for Cyberspace, INc.
I would accept that Mark sent e-mail aknowledgment of donations
throughout the year, with a collectivsnail mail letter at year-end
to provide that paper record for tax purposes. He should not have to
spend time and 32 cents on each donation.
|
srw
|
|
response 41 of 62:
|
Jul 11 02:46 UTC 1998 |
You can get 5% from a Money Market Mutual Fund. You don't need gobs of money
to open one, and you can avoid monthly fees. I mentioned earlier that if Grex
has money in the bank that it is not planning on spending, that a money morket
account would be a better choice. Even if there is not enough to open one as
is, there would be if we had a single life membership at $1200 to augment it.
I doubt anyone would donate that much until the 501(C)(3) was adopted,
but after that it is a possibilty (perhaps remote, perhaps not).
I would rather see us invest any such money as an endowment than to invest
it in hardware or other infrastructure in hopes of growing grex's membership.
THe latter seems risky. The former much less so.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 42 of 62:
|
Jul 11 04:05 UTC 1998 |
Dues in 501(c)3 non-profits are tax deductible unless something of significant
value is provided. An example of this is a magazine that is also sold on
the newstand. I will agree that this can gradate into a murky area. Examples
of what has and has not been allowed essentially define the law. I the
501(c)3 item I gave a URL for further information on what is deductible
and what is not, and what services do or do not have to be declared. Since
a members-only parking lot in the middle of New York City does not have
to be declared (value deducted from dues), the rules are pretty liberal.
I recall one of the criteria that if the service is *used frequently* by
members, it need not be declared. However if a free annual dinner were
awarded members, the value of that would have to be declared (i.e, subtracted
from the deduction).
|
mary
|
|
response 43 of 62:
|
Jul 11 11:21 UTC 1998 |
Wow! Where do you get a Money Market Account that pays 5%
on an investment of less than $5,000, without fees or that
isn't tied to an account with a much larger balance?
I'd like the name of that investment firm or bank. ;-)
|
other
|
|
response 44 of 62:
|
Jul 11 14:37 UTC 1998 |
i have a mutual fund account that seems to be paying about 25% per year...
|
mary
|
|
response 45 of 62:
|
Jul 11 17:08 UTC 1998 |
So do I but that wasn't the question. ;-)
|
i
|
|
response 46 of 62:
|
Jul 11 19:56 UTC 1998 |
Unless something's changed very recently, Vanguard is paying about 5.2%
on their money market fund with a $3K minimum. 800-662-6273,#,7#,30#
should tell you the actual current yield. (Or visit their web site, or
subtract about 29 basis points from the current AAA money rate, or...)
Note: they call it their "Prime Portfolio", but it bears *NO* resemblance
to (far risker and less liquid) "Prime Rate" funds.
|
srw
|
|
response 47 of 62:
|
Jul 12 04:53 UTC 1998 |
I have a Fidelity MM account with a $2500 minimum to open it, but the
minimum is only checked once a year or some such. I don't remember the
exact details about what maintenance minimums are, but they are not way
above what Grex can handle. I called last year and confirmed that there
are no monthly fees, even for an organization as opposed to an
individual.
|
mary
|
|
response 48 of 62:
|
Jul 12 06:14 UTC 1998 |
What's the interest rate?
|
katie
|
|
response 49 of 62:
|
Jul 12 07:04 UTC 1998 |
MOst investment company money market mutual funds pay 5% right now, give or
take a basis point or two. Most also have minimum balance requirements to
open (unless you sign up for automatic investments) but the ones I have
experience with allow the balance to fall after the account is opened.
Most have checking limits; either you`re allowed a certain number of checks
per month, or each check must be written for a minimum amount.
MOney market mutual funds are extremely safe and liquid; however they are
NOT guaranteed or insured.
I don't know of any money market funds that have fees. The ones I have
experience with are totally free of charge.
|