You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-54        
 
Author Message
25 new of 54 responses total.
other
response 25 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 9 02:50 UTC 1998

i don't think those classifications are mutually exclusive.
rcurl
response 26 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 9 05:08 UTC 1998

501(h)whatever is a declaration that you will be bound by existing
law on influencing legislation. If you don't elect this option, the
limit is "no significant influence", which it would be up to examiners
to define. If you elect, the amounts are spelled out. It is a *crazy* law
that species the legal requirements but which does not apply unless you
fill out an application to have it apply. I think other meant that
the classifications can be elected independently. Not quite, though,
as you must be a 501(c)x to elect 501(h)y.
other
response 27 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 10 04:53 UTC 1998

logically, what i said was that being classified as one of those would not
preclude being classified as the other as well.  that is consistent with your
followup statements.
janc
response 28 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 11 19:28 UTC 1998

Yup.  501(h) and 501(c)3 aren't alternatives.  They are just different
sections of the tax code.  Some sections describe different kinds of tax
exempt organizations, but 501(h) isn't a different kind of organization.  It's
an alternative set of rules that you can choose to have your political
involvement evaluated by, if you like.

Given the explanation, I doubt if the IRS will care if we check yes or no on
this question.  I think everything that the explanation allows is legal with
in the law for 501(c)3 status.  If it isn't, I don't think we would want
501(c)3 status.  I also don't want anyone reading this, be it the IRS or users
of Grex, to imagine that we are going to limit discussions of legislation on
Grex, or that Cyberspace Communications is *completely* barred from having
opinions on legislation.  I want it to be absolutely clear that we are
reserving the right to do everything allowed by the law.  So I deliberately
skated close to the edge here.  It is more important to be absolutely clear
on what Grex wants to do here than it is to get this application accepted on
the first submission.

So the ambiguity here is whether the question about attempting to influence
legislation means "in any way at all" or "in any way not allowed for by the
501(c)3 law".  If I answer the second interpretation "no" then in the eyes
of someone reading with the first interpretation, I could be barring us from
things we don't need to be barred from.  I think the correct thing is to
interpret the question broadly and stake out our ground explicitly, in a form
that can not be easily misinterpreted.
rcurl
response 29 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 12 05:17 UTC 1998

Don't worry, they'll come back with a slew of questions - maybe even on
this point.
mta
response 30 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 13 21:14 UTC 1998

I agree, jan.
janc
response 31 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 16:26 UTC 1998

OK, I've reviewed the corrections suggested in this item.

>#11 of 30: by Mark A. Conger (aruba) on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 (17:32):
> -In #3, when you list our sources of income, I'm not sure the JCC sales,
from
> which accounted for a fair chunk of our income at one time, fit any of the
> categories you list.  Possibly "donations of equipment".  Perhaps there
should
> be another item, "Sale of donated items".  Or possibly we don't need it.

I was thinking of that as fitting under number 2: "Other individual and
corporate donations of money, goods, and services."  Some donated equipment
we sell, some we use.  I don't think we have to designate in this section
what we do with if after it is given to us.  I've let this stand.

> -There was an apostrophe out of place in the support text you quoted; it
said
> "user's" where the text says (correctly) "users'".

fixed.

> -There was one place where you said "Cyberspace Communication" instead of
> "Cyberspace Communications".  Let me see if I can find that...
> The missing "s" was in #2, Section A, subsection 6.

fixed.

>#13 of 30: by Mary Remmers (mary) on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 (20:42):
> #5, under 11c: "Members do not receive in special privileges in connecting
> to Grex or using any services on Grex itself."  s/any/in

fixed.

>#15 of 30: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Tue, Apr 28, 1998 (01:27):
> Institutional members *are* members. The privileges of "members" are
> specified in the bylaws and are a matter of *State* law. A Michigan
> non-profit corporation is permitted to specify the privileges associated
> with different classes of membership. In fact, a charitable non-profit
> could have lots of members with *none* being able to vote, but they
> would still be members in law.
>
> 11c should be edited to recognize two classes of membership and their
> respective privileges.

I've done this.

I've let the "influencing legislation" part stand.
janc
response 32 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 16:28 UTC 1998

The only part that had non-trivial changes is attachment 9, which has been
corrected to take into account Rane's statement that institutional members
are real members.  Here's the new version:
====================================
Attachment Number 9
Cyberspace Communications, Inc. (EID 38-2998091)
 Form 1023, Part II,  Item 11:

Question:
a.  Describe the organization's membership requirements and attach a
    schedule of membership fees and dues.

b.  Describe the organizations present  and proposed efforts to attract
    members and attach a copy of any descriptive literature or promotional
    material used for this purpose.

c.  What benefits do (or will) the members receive in exchange for their
    payments?

Response:
a.  Membership costs $6 a month, or $60 a year.  Members must be individuals.
    Members are also asked to provide some form of ID, which is not otherwise
    required from our users.

b.  The web pages and login screens on Grex contain notices asking users to
    consider becoming members.  Membership is often mentioned in our public
    discussion forums, especially those relating to the administration of
    the system.  The following text is displayed to users who ask for more

    information on-line:

>Thanks for asking how to support Grex.  You don't have to pay to use Grex,

>but users' donations pay all the bills.  If users don't support Grex, it 
>will go away.  Please support this valuable community resource.
>
>The best way to support Grex is to become a member.  Members get to:
>  - vote in Grex elections (if you've paid for three months or more)
>  - receive the 'Wizard in Training' manual free (again with 3 months)
>  - use our internet link.
>
>Organizations may also support Grex and be recognized as Institutional 
>members.  Institutional members have the same privileges as regular 
>members, except the right to vote.
>
>The minimum membership dues donation - Individual or Institutional - is 
>$6/month or $60/year (US currency). Send a personal check or enclose a copy

>of other ID with your dues.  Other donations at any time from members or 
>non-members are welcome.  Write to 'aruba' for more info.  Send cash, 
>checks or money orders to:
>
>Cyberspace Communications Inc
>P.O. Box 4432
>Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432

    Cyberspace Communications occasionally circulates fliers and places
    advertisements in various publications, but these are primarily designed
    to attract users to the system, not to win new members.

c.  Individual members receive the right to vote in board elections and run
    for board positions.  They may call for and vote in referenda.

    Institutional members do not have the right to vote.

    All members may receive, if they like, a copy of a 23-page photocopied
    user manual.  This is also available to all users for our cost of one
    dollar.

    Members do not receive any special privileges in connecting to Grex
    or using any services on Grex itself.  However, they do have have
    expanded privileges in connecting from Grex to other computers on
    the Internet.  The most important Internet services, E-mail and
    web browsing, are free to all Grex users, but only members can use
    their Grex accounts to do such things as use a 'telnet' program
    to log into another system on the net, or use an 'ftp' program to
    transfer files to and from other systems on the net, or use an 'irc'
    program to access the Internet Relay Chat.  These are services that
    we cannot offer to thousands of anonymous users because we lack
    the resources to support them, and, in some cases, because they
    would enable hackers to use our system as a safe base for attacking
    other systems on the Internet.  Since these services are not of much
    interest to most people and are provided with much better quality
    by even the least expensive commercial Internet service providers,
    they do not seem to be a large incentive for most of our members.
janc
response 33 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 16:35 UTC 1998

If there are further corrections, please let me know before the board meeting.
I will bring a copy of the final version to the board meeting, and make varous
photocopies and send it off afterwards.

Board members:  It would probably be good to review all this before the
meeting.
rcurl
response 34 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 20:24 UTC 1998

The information on income from "money, goods and services" is independent
of what you do with those. If you sell goods, purchased or donated, that
is money income. The value of goods donated is only of interest to the
donor, by the way (for tax purposes). We are prohibited by law from
setting any value on donated goods (or property). 
other
response 35 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 21:01 UTC 1998

Under response section a), i think it would be most clear to identify the two
distinct classes of membership up front.  As written, it says, "Members must
be individuals."  I suggest "Members must be individuals, except in the case
of Institutional Membership.  See section c) for a description of the
difference between regular and institutional memberships."
janc
response 36 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 21:52 UTC 1998

Oops.  I should delete the "members must be individuals." sentence from part
(a).
janc
response 37 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 21:59 UTC 1998

OK.  A version of the *COMPLETE* application is now on the web at:

       http://www.cyberspace.org/local/grex/501c3.html

This took an absurd amount of typing, but I think it was worth doing, just
to be able to add this to our collection of on-line Grex documents.
janc
response 38 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 22:01 UTC 1998

On thing I noticed as I typed the form in is that because I check No on
Part II, line 4 I didn't have to fill out question 6 and 7.  The upshot of
this is that I think our 501(c)3 status may after all be retroactive to the
founding of Grex if that status is granted.
mary
response 39 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 21 22:38 UTC 1998

Re: #37  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you.
other
response 40 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 22 08:23 UTC 1998

re #39   What she said.
mary
response 41 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 23 12:49 UTC 1998

I'll add this document to the archive files as soon as it has Board
approval and the wording is finalized. 

I wonder if submitting this to the new kinder and gentler
IRS will mean we have a better chance of getting approval? 
janc
response 42 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 23 18:32 UTC 1998

I haven't done an ascii text version of the whole thing, just the
portions posted here.  I decided maintaining a laser printable version,
an HTML version, and an ASCII version would be too much work.
dang
response 43 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 23 18:43 UTC 1998

(Isn't the html version laser printable?  I can do in html most of what I want
to do in word etc.)
mta
response 44 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 24 15:31 UTC 1998

Thanks, Jan.  Incredible work!
janc
response 45 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 25 02:04 UTC 1998

I guess the html version is printable, but not the way I did it.  The
HTML version I did is a rough facimile of the actual form, including all
the questions.  I have to send the real form in to the IRS, not my HTML
facimile.  Many of the answers shown in the HTML form don't actually fit
in the boxes on the IRS form (which are often tiny) and are thus
organized instead as attachments with lots of cross references from the
form to the attachments and back again.  So the printable-for-the-IRS
version turns out to be very different in structure and format from the
browsable-for-Grexers version.

Maybe at some point I'll try to make an ASCII version by pointing lynx
at the browsable version and fixing up whatever shows up there.
lilmo
response 46 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 26 23:50 UTC 1998

Regarding the Web-readable version:

Perhaps Part I should be entitled "Identification ..."?

ZIP Code is separated with a hyphen.

Part III #2: "one of the expections" should probably read "one of the
exceptions"  :-)  I don't think they are referring to spitting!

further question:  why does (b) there not apply to us?

OK, I'm too tired to read any more, but it really does look VERY nice, despite
my quibles.  Any update on when it was or will be sent?
janc
response 47 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 27 01:28 UTC 1998

>Perhaps Part I should be entitled "Identification ..."?

yes.

>ZIP Code is separated with a hyphen.

Not on the original form.

>"one of the expections" should probably read "one of the exceptions"

yes.

>further question:  why does (b) there not apply to us?

Because our gross receipts have been over $5000 in all recent tax years.

I didn't do any proof reading of the stuff I typed in from the IRS forms.
I'm happy to correct any other problems in that that anyone notices.
lilmo
response 48 of 54: Mark Unseen   May 28 21:16 UTC 1998

Re ZIP Code: Oh.

*shrug*
mary
response 49 of 54: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 02:25 UTC 1998

The text version of Grex's 501(c)3 application is now 
available at /usr/local/grexdoc/archives/501.txt.

It's not as pretty as the GUI version but the info
is there.
 0-24   25-49   50-54        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss