|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 63 responses total. |
other
|
|
response 25 of 63:
| 
May 27 17:06 UTC 2003 |
Given the range of things he has stated, I would put no faith in anything
he says, which best suggests ignoring all of it.
|
aruba
|
|
response 26 of 63:
|
May 27 17:14 UTC 2003 |
I'm not comfortable excluding someone based on past disagreements with
people. I *am* comfortable excluding someone based on demonstrated
lack of payment for things in the past, and for withdrawing bids. That's
why I'd like to know if polytarp is withdrawing his bids.
|
aruba
|
|
response 27 of 63:
|
May 27 17:16 UTC 2003 |
Todd and Eric slipped in. WHat Todd says is what I *think* polytarp is
saying, but I'm not sure.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 28 of 63:
|
May 27 18:07 UTC 2003 |
Mr Plesco is absolutely correct.
|
other
|
|
response 29 of 63:
|
May 27 19:13 UTC 2003 |
Mark, it's your call, so I support your option to do what you feel is
appropriate.
For the record, I remain skeptical.
|
aruba
|
|
response 30 of 63:
|
May 27 19:54 UTC 2003 |
OK, we'll accept your bid, polytarp. Think of it as a chance to impress
Eric with your degree of responsibility. If you win the item, pay for it,
and then declare that you don't want to receive it, that's between you and
Todd.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 31 of 63:
|
May 27 20:51 UTC 2003 |
I"VE ALREADY DECLARED I DON"T WANT IT,, !!!
|
other
|
|
response 32 of 63:
|
May 27 22:10 UTC 2003 |
Then it shouldn't be a problem for you to make the declaration again once
you have sent in the money.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 33 of 63:
|
May 27 23:05 UTC 2003 |
I refuse.
|
aruba
|
|
response 34 of 63:
|
May 28 01:07 UTC 2003 |
Like I said, that'll be between you and Todd.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 35 of 63:
|
May 28 02:33 UTC 2003 |
It's also between me and OTHER.
|
other
|
|
response 36 of 63:
|
May 28 04:03 UTC 2003 |
there's nothing between you and me but a simmering antipathy.
|
tod
|
|
response 37 of 63:
|
May 28 04:22 UTC 2003 |
It gives me warm fuzzies to see such activity in my auction item.
|
jep
|
|
response 38 of 63:
|
May 28 15:04 UTC 2003 |
re resp:36: Eric, you need to cultivate your antipathies carefully. In
your position, it can be important to despise -- and be despised by --
the right type of people.
|
dah
|
|
response 39 of 63:
|
May 29 01:22 UTC 2003 |
SOMEONE SOMEONE PLEASE PLEASE!
BID HIGHER THAN ME! I WILL PAY YOU!
|
aruba
|
|
response 40 of 63:
|
May 29 03:15 UTC 2003 |
Current high bid on the DISA security course is $13.01, made by polytarp on
Friday the 23rd.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 41 of 63:
|
May 29 18:43 UTC 2003 |
WHAT?!?!
|
aruba
|
|
response 42 of 63:
|
May 30 22:59 UTC 2003 |
This DISA course is going once to polytarp for $13.01.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 43 of 63:
|
May 31 01:50 UTC 2003 |
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
|
tod
|
|
response 44 of 63:
|
May 31 05:19 UTC 2003 |
You are looking like a WINNER
|
polytarp
|
|
response 45 of 63:
|
May 31 15:21 UTC 2003 |
WAIT!!
I AM ALLOWED TO BID ON MYSELF!!!
13.02
THERE!
|
polytarp
|
|
response 46 of 63:
|
May 31 15:27 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 47 of 63:
|
May 31 15:28 UTC 2003 |
When nobody has made a new bid in at least a week, an auctioneer will
enter a response saying that the item is "going once" to the highest
bidder. If 24 hours pass without a new bid, the auctioneer will
announce that the item is "going twice". And if another 24 hours go
by without a bid, then an auctioneer announces that the item is sold.
No sale is final until an auctioneer says so, so if 24 hours have
passed since "going twice" but the item has not been closed, you may
continue bidding.
SEE?!
NO_ONE"S WON YET!!
|
aruba
|
|
response 48 of 63:
|
May 31 15:44 UTC 2003 |
polytarp, I'm not playing this game. If you made a bid and are not going to
follow through on it, you are costing Grex money, not to mention wasting my
time. So either withdraw your bid and deal with the consequences, or pay
what you promised (assuming you win).
Your bid of $13.02 is not accepted. One more delaying tactic and I'm
declaring all your bids invalid and banning you from the auction.
|
keesan
|
|
response 49 of 63:
|
May 31 17:48 UTC 2003 |
Are responses 43, 45, 46 and 47 of sufficent general interest for someone to
summarize them to those of us who are using a twit filter?
|
