|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 186 responses total. |
happyboy
|
|
response 25 of 186:
| 
Jan 14 09:05 UTC 2006 |
i found the ass kissing that the republo-corporatists
were engaging in entertaining.
|
klg
|
|
response 26 of 186:
|
Jan 15 02:44 UTC 2006 |
Kenny and Brodbeck know how Alito will vote on abortion just as well as
NARAL knew how Breyer would.
Yeah. Kennedy's still tired from trying to rescue Mary Jo.
|
tsty
|
|
response 27 of 186:
|
Jan 15 21:20 UTC 2006 |
...all that swimming did it???? or spinning?
|
drew
|
|
response 28 of 186:
|
Jan 15 23:24 UTC 2006 |
That's all water under the bridge.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 29 of 186:
|
Jan 17 07:53 UTC 2006 |
Ouch!
I honestly believe Harriet Meier was not a serious nomination.
|
richard
|
|
response 30 of 186:
|
Jan 18 03:15 UTC 2006 |
Alito is going to join with Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and new
Chief Justice John Roberts as the Four Musketeers of hardline
conservatism. Remember too that the court's most liberal justice,
Justice John Paul Stevens, turns 85 in April. Bush and co. know
Stevens won't live forever, or possibly be lucid enough to stay on the
court forever, and all they have to do is be able to replace him with
a "fifth musketeer", and they've won the battle. This court is VERY
close to being controlled by the right.
|
richard
|
|
response 31 of 186:
|
Jan 18 03:18 UTC 2006 |
remember too that Justice Kennedy is turning 70 this year, Bader
Ginsberg is 73. All it takes is Bush being able to replace Stevens,
Ginsburg or Kennedy. Just one of them.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 32 of 186:
|
Jan 18 04:42 UTC 2006 |
Maybe the prospect of a hostile judciary will finally motivate the
Democratic Party to get off their sorry asses and make a stab at
putting together a platform attractive enough for them to retake at
least one of the other two branches of government instead of sitting
back and relying on the courts to be the only guardians of our civil
liberties.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 33 of 186:
|
Jan 18 08:18 UTC 2006 |
Or maybe it will cause them to be more apathetic. Just my half-empty
response.
|
klg
|
|
response 34 of 186:
|
Jan 18 12:00 UTC 2006 |
Richard you started my day off right. Thanks.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 35 of 186:
|
Jan 18 13:36 UTC 2006 |
KLG, so matter how many asses you kiss, you will not be the next
nominee.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 36 of 186:
|
Jan 18 14:20 UTC 2006 |
The democrats are good at excluding people. I think the democratic party
needs to realize that Americans are not as liberal as other people in
the world. Americans do not want to be more like Europeans. Just because
Europe is more liberal than you, that does not make you centrist. The
Bush Administration through its screw-ups has handed the democrats the
next presidential election. Its the DNC's election to lose.
|
jep
|
|
response 37 of 186:
|
Jan 18 17:55 UTC 2006 |
I think it's pretty early to predict a Democratic president in 2008. I
think it's pretty likely there will be a Democratic controlled House of
Representatives after the elections of this year. There are a lot of
people who are fed up with the GOP right now, including myself.
It will be interesting whether that Congress can shift the tide of
public opinion as the Gingrich/Contract With America Congress did in
1994. If they're seen as blocking government from doing what it ought
to be doing, there'll be another Republican president in 2008. If they
can correct the excesses of the current Congress, be seen as ethical,
and cause the president to become more moderate, they could take a lot
of power back from the Republicans.
There will be other factors, too, of course. Will the GOP nominate
someone to carry on the work of Bush, or someone who will make
substantial changes? Will they be able to canonize Bush like they did
Reagan? Will the Bush administration be able to bring home a lot of
the troops from Iraq and Afghanistan? Will there be any other major
attacks on the US? How will the economy be doing in 2008?
|
tod
|
|
response 38 of 186:
|
Jan 18 18:00 UTC 2006 |
re #30
I agree with you richard. After their opinions on assisted suicde drug use
and their defense of the AG's lawbending, its obvious they have a fundie
agenda.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 39 of 186:
|
Jan 18 18:52 UTC 2006 |
I solidy disagree with the assertion that Europeans are more liberal
than Americans. There are certain aspects about which one side is more
liberal than the other. I'd rather be an ethnic minority in the US than
I would in Europe.
|
tod
|
|
response 40 of 186:
|
Jan 18 19:07 UTC 2006 |
Do you have more equality as a woman in the US than in Europe?
|
twenex
|
|
response 41 of 186:
|
Jan 18 19:21 UTC 2006 |
Re: #39. I wouldn't.
|
klg
|
|
response 42 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:13 UTC 2006 |
I'd much rather be Jewish in the US than anywhere else in the world
other than Israel.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 43 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:18 UTC 2006 |
Being Jewish in Canada would be OK.
|
twenex
|
|
response 44 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:19 UTC 2006 |
Or, indeed, Europe.
Too much violence in Israel to feel safe there, as a Jew or otherwise.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 45 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:22 UTC 2006 |
I'm a black woman, tod. I can hardly separate the two. Having said
that, no, I'd have less equality in Europe, save perhaps the U.K.
Twenex, which ethnic minority group do you belong to?
|
naftee
|
|
response 46 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:23 UTC 2006 |
i think the jews in MOntreal do quite fine !
but uh; i think in toronto it's a slightly better atmosphere
|
twenex
|
|
response 47 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:24 UTC 2006 |
Re: #45. Jewish.
|
klg
|
|
response 48 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:25 UTC 2006 |
Oh, yeah??? How would you know, VH??
My group gave money to construct a building at a Canadian Jewish camp.
They were given an extraordinarily hard time by the authorities in
meeting the various construction rules and regulations. It wasn't like
they were building in a city or town.
|
twenex
|
|
response 49 of 186:
|
Jan 18 20:25 UTC 2006 |
Re: #47. Not that I see the relevance of the question.
|