| Grex > Agora46 > #97: MoD scientist linked to BBC leak found dead |
| response 25 of 53: | 
Jul 22 03:12 UTC 2003 |
It does seem pretty common for people to get caught doing something career ending, and commit suicide.
| response 26 of 53: |
Jul 22 17:30 UTC 2003 |
Re #24. It's a major public service thing over here.
| response 27 of 53: |
Jul 22 19:27 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 28 of 53: |
Jul 23 01:59 UTC 2003 |
Re 24/26. I meant general stress and embarrassment, not necessarily suicide.
| response 29 of 53: |
Jul 23 15:10 UTC 2003 |
I think it's far more likely that this was a suicide than some kind of government conspiracy. Especially since his death has only brought more attention.
| response 30 of 53: |
Jul 23 15:33 UTC 2003 |
I think the inquiry has more to do with finding out whether pressure from Dr. Kelly's superiors at the MoD caused him to commit suicide, rather than a conspiracy as such. British people are much more likely to believe in governmental incompetence than in conspiracies.
| response 31 of 53: |
Jul 23 17:26 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 32 of 53: |
Jul 23 20:17 UTC 2003 |
The fucking liberals killed him because they knew he would vindicate our great president BUSH. ALL HAIL THE REPUBLICAN PARTY on your knees liberal scum.
| response 33 of 53: |
Jul 23 23:59 UTC 2003 |
(What a jerk.)
| response 34 of 53: |
Jul 24 00:03 UTC 2003 |
Go jerk off..that's the only way you'll ever get sex.
| response 35 of 53: |
Jul 24 00:45 UTC 2003 |
(Another jerk!)
| response 36 of 53: |
Jul 24 05:35 UTC 2003 |
pot calls kettle black.
| response 37 of 53: |
Jul 24 14:38 UTC 2003 |
We pots are always calling those kettles black, here on Grex.
| response 38 of 53: |
Jul 24 16:48 UTC 2003 |
(when they have nothing intelligent to say)
| response 39 of 53: |
Jul 24 16:49 UTC 2003 |
(Define "intelligent")
| response 40 of 53: |
Jul 24 18:06 UTC 2003 |
Look it up.
| response 41 of 53: |
Jul 24 19:54 UTC 2003 |
Re #34: And a new study shows jerking off lowers your chances of prostate cancer! (Hmm. This may cause people to rethink whether they want to advise their enemies to do it.)
| response 42 of 53: |
Jul 24 19:56 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 43 of 53: |
Jul 25 00:41 UTC 2003 |
Re #41: really? How does that work?
| response 44 of 53: |
Jul 25 01:44 UTC 2003 |
(I might, but it wouldn't do any good around here.)
| response 45 of 53: |
Jul 25 11:42 UTC 2003 |
That's gerat news, as I whack off pretty much every night.
| response 46 of 53: |
Jul 25 13:20 UTC 2003 |
Re #43: Here's the article: http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/AOL/2003/07/17/masturbate030717 It was a statistical study and the mechanism isn't really known.
| response 47 of 53: |
Jul 25 13:58 UTC 2003 |
"The study suggests ejaculation by means of masturbation provides better protection than ejaculation in sexual intercourse because men can pick up infections from intercourse that actually increase the risk of getting prostate cancer." Probably there is a correlation between not have intercourse much and masturbating alot. In which case it may be the lack of intercourse which causes reduced chances of prostrate cancer later in life.
| response 48 of 53: |
Jul 25 16:03 UTC 2003 |
You'd think they would have controlled for that by including non-sexually-active men who didn't masturbate regularly. But without seeing detailed information on the study it's hard to be sure.
| response 49 of 53: |
Jul 26 13:19 UTC 2003 |
Let me guess: prostrate cancer is a disease you take lying down?