You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-60        
 
Author Message
25 new of 60 responses total.
scott
response 25 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 18:55 UTC 2003

Don't forget that 9/11 happened on Bush's watch, not that wimpy Bill clinton's
pacifist 8 years.
tod
response 26 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 19:28 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

scott
response 27 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 19:33 UTC 2003

Donald Rumsfeld once had a friendly meeting with Saddam.  What's your point?
tod
response 28 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 19:52 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

slynne
response 29 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 20:41 UTC 2003

Wasnt it the Bush Administration that gave the Taliban millions of 
dollars just a few months before 9/11?
tod
response 30 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 21:41 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jazz
response 31 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 21:52 UTC 2003

        Bush Sr. had prior knowledge of al Quaeda, too, so?

tod
response 32 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 22:02 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mary
response 33 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 22:47 UTC 2003

Saddam played a masterfull shell game with the *issue* of
WMD.  He could end up bringing down another Bush with his
tactics.
mary
response 34 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 22:48 UTC 2003

s/masterful/masterfull
tod
response 35 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 23:16 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jazz
response 36 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 03:34 UTC 2003

        Bin Laden was the #1 suspect in any unattributed bombing since the
Reagan administration.  Those cheezy Nostradamus books were listing him as
a possible "antichrist" in the eighties.  C'mon.
gull
response 37 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 13:58 UTC 2003

And when Clinton did fire cruise missiles based on intelligence about
Bin Laden's whereabouts, he was accused of trying to distract people
from his affair with Monica.  The same people who criticized him for
acting then are now criticizing him for not doing enough.

I think the Iraq war will be a rallying cry for the recruiting of more
terrorists, but because it'll take a few years for that to become
apparent it will probably be blamed on the next President instead of on
Bush.  It may be useful as a distraction, though -- maybe the terrorists
will be too busy attacking our troops in the area to plan attacks on
U.S. soil.
tod
response 38 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 18:08 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jep
response 39 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 18:39 UTC 2003

Yes, he did, or tried to.  It was about 4 or 5 years ago as I recall 
it.  That's when I first heard of Osama bin Laden.
novomit
response 40 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 18:41 UTC 2003

Yeah, didn't he end up hitting a non-terrorist site in northern Africa
somewhere?
gelinas
response 41 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 19:52 UTC 2003

The missile(s) hit the Somalian chemical plant they were aimed at.
Third-party examination of the site failed to reveal the evidence of
chemical-weapon production that was the justification for targetting that
particular bin Laden enterprise.
tod
response 42 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 19:55 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 43 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:14 UTC 2003

Re #41: I was thinking of the one where he was accused of attacking
"empty tents in the desert", actually, but that's another one.

'Course nowadays we're not supposed to question things like lack of
evidence of chemical weapon production.
bru
response 44 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:27 UTC 2003

empty tents and chemical plants that made asperin should be proof of how good
our intelligence operation is.
tod
response 45 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 21:14 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

novomit
response 46 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 11:58 UTC 2003

So can pencil lead, apparently. 
tod
response 47 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 22:16 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

novomit
response 48 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 10 12:37 UTC 2003

Pencil lead = graphite. I just dont much like to use them words that contain
"ph", they are kind of creepy. 
polytarp
response 49 of 60: Mark Unseen   Jul 10 12:52 UTC 2003

On IRC I occasionally name myself ph.
 0-24   25-49   50-60        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss