You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-61        
 
Author Message
25 new of 61 responses total.
cross
response 25 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 05:27 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

scott
response 26 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 13:19 UTC 2003

THere is still the possibility that he did this to himself.
tod
response 27 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 16:25 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cross
response 28 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 16:36 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tod
response 29 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 16:50 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 30 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 16:52 UTC 2003

Re #28: I think that's pretty unfair.  The police were dealing with an
unknown situation, and a person of unknown mental state.  The "death
sentence" was issued by the person who put the bomb on the guy, not the
police.

Re #29: Or run up to the nearest cop, hug him, and set it off.  We still
don't know that this isn't some mentally unbalanced guy who did this to
himself.
tod
response 31 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 17:12 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cross
response 32 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 19:22 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tod
response 33 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 20:23 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 34 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 20:43 UTC 2003

...with a bomb around his neck. Presumably it was timed to go off if
not neutralized first. He might have known how long he had - I would think
the person that put it there would have said "you have xyz (time)....". 

The bomb might have been made less fatal if it could have been firmly
clamped in some device that would hold the collar and divert any pieces.
For instance, in the gap between those elevator doors that have parts
that both slide up and down. It would perhaps also been useful to slide
the bomb part to the back first. But who could have known that they had
time for anything like that?
tod
response 35 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 21:05 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cross
response 36 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 22:09 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jep
response 37 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 02:14 UTC 2003

Not many cops have experience with a situation like that one.  They're 
just people.  How could they or anyone else have known how to deal 
with such a situation?

I say to give the cops a break.
tod
response 38 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 03:07 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

russ
response 39 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 05:04 UTC 2003

Re #33:

>I didn't see a pooch. Just a guy that had robbed a bank.

A guy who was obviously in danger, whose story was quite
consistent with his actions (he robbed the bank because he was
under threat of death!)... and the cops took no action to save
him so he could help nail the person truly responsible.

The poor pizza driver was a *hostage*.  The cops treated him like
a piece of meat, and their prophecy fullfilled itself in due time.

The cops really and truly fucked up.  Admit it.  They lost their
only eyewitness and let an innocent man die because they refused
to recognize the weapon being used to coerce him and what it meant.
cross
response 40 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 06:38 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mcnally
response 41 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 07:52 UTC 2003

  The people who say "Hindsight is 20/20," are underestimating -- it's much
  better than that.  What seems like a simple decision now might've been
  considerably less clear at the time.
pvn
response 42 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 08:21 UTC 2003

Yah.  Give the cops a break!  Its not like this kind of thing has
happened before (except perhaps in movies and novels which likely
inspired this).  Why do I suspect that the cops are going to have
experience with this type of thing in the future?  It is rather clever
and will probably happen again (I seems to recall the plot of a recent
bad movie that I didn't see but read about.)  To prevent the collar
being removed you merely pass a trigger through the collar - cut it and
boom.  Obviously the solution to this kind of crime is to move to a
"cashless" society.  Some idiot suggested "padding".  Modern explosives
are such that all that would do is slightly reduce the cost of the
funeral if an open casket was asked for - less mortuary wax.
scott
response 43 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 13:05 UTC 2003

beady gets pretty dumb late at night...  It's not a safe assumption that
"modern" explosives were used.  Not only was it a tiny, concealed bomb, but
may well have been homebrew to avoid having the tracer compounds.
tod
response 44 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 13:27 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cross
response 45 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 19:17 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

bru
response 46 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 21:28 UTC 2003

leaving a suspect cuffed is standard procedure having to do wiht officer and
suspect safety.  But leaving him sitting there alone while the time clicked
down may have been procedure, I am not sure it was right.
jmsaul
response 47 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 22:16 UTC 2003

The wound was the size of a postcard, not a postage stamp, I thought.
gull
response 48 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 7 00:07 UTC 2003

Re #45: So you're saying they should have risked an innocent officer's
life to try to remove the thing, when they knew the bomb squad was on
the way?  If an officer had tried to remove it and it had exploded, you
would be criticizing him for killing the pizza delivery guy by "being a
cowboy" and trying to remove the bomb himself instead of waiting for
trained personnel.  This was quite simply a no-win situation.
cross
response 49 of 61: Mark Unseen   Sep 7 02:04 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-61        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss