|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 150 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 25 of 150:
| 
Jul 24 17:53 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
dcat
|
|
response 26 of 150:
|
Jul 24 17:57 UTC 2003 |
re13: I found much of the same at Oberlin. Politically it's very 'liberal',
that is, the main stream of thought there is several steps to the metaphorical
left of that of the rest of the country. There's still a powerful slip,
though; it's *very* hard to be outside the local mainstream, to either side.
Ann Arbor is also much like that, although less so, since it's somewhere over
thirty times the size. . . .
|
sabre
|
|
response 27 of 150:
|
Jul 24 18:14 UTC 2003 |
RE#26
Exactly...That's why your ideals are so stupid. You are out of sync.
WE HAVE THE POWER NOW. And we will keep it another 4 years.
Eat your corrupt hearts out.
|
twenex
|
|
response 28 of 150:
|
Jul 24 18:25 UTC 2003 |
Mick - i know plenty insecure ppl who wouldn't *dare* admit it. I say again:
go mick.
|
dcat
|
|
response 29 of 150:
|
Jul 24 18:50 UTC 2003 |
sabre, if you hate us all so much, why don't you just leave?
|
tod
|
|
response 30 of 150:
|
Jul 24 19:04 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 31 of 150:
|
Jul 24 20:11 UTC 2003 |
Re #0: I always thought the expression was, 'He could suck-start a Chevy!'
Re #4: Perhaps the people on Grex who are gay don't see any reason to
broadcast it to the world. You don't see people running around shouting
about being heterosexual, either. How often do sexual topics really
come up here?
Re #10: Now you know how liberals feel in the rest of Michigan.
Re #30: Bush is a draft-dodger, too, so I don't see why it matters that
Clinton was. A lot of politicians who grew up during that era were,
including most of the people in the Bush administration who were most
strongly in favor of war. It's also a little silly to accuse Clinton of
not tracking down the USS Cole bombers when he was out of office before
the investigation could be completed.
Don't forget that when Bush was first elected he regarded hunting Osama
Bin Laden as a curious fixation of Clinton's and a waste of time. It
wasn't until after 9/11 that he decided finding Osama should be a
priority. Bush actually ran on an isolationist platform.
|
sabre
|
|
response 32 of 150:
|
Jul 24 21:26 UTC 2003 |
RE#29
I never said I hated anyone. I just think liberals are full of shit.
I stay here to balance out the propaganda you post.
I will continue to express my views even if EVERYONE disagrees with them.
I will not bow to the fallacy of ad- populace.
RE#30
Heh Heh...Clinton is supporting Bush in his time of need. Now that's a wise
liberal.
|
ea
|
|
response 33 of 150:
|
Jul 24 22:21 UTC 2003 |
re #10 - why would you need to wear your uniform to your wife's office?
I had thought that, in general (possibly an unwritten rule), Law
Enforcement officers don't wear their uniforms when they're off duty,
and not in the process of going to/from their post.
(Unless you'd be in the office on some official capacity, in which case
you should wear the gun, as you'd be on duty. (However, I fail to see
the reason a Customs/Border Patrol officer would need to be on duty in a
non-governmental office in downtown Ann Arbor))
|
cross
|
|
response 34 of 150:
|
Jul 24 22:22 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 35 of 150:
|
Jul 24 22:46 UTC 2003 |
Twinkie? You haven't seen my photo you little faggot. Don't be in such a hurry
to get your ass beat. I HAVE seen yours.<smirk>
I live in South Fl dude. New Yorkers come down here all the time acting tough.
They usually get that ass BEAT. You fuckers aren't about shit...just alot of
mouth and bravado.
|
tod
|
|
response 36 of 150:
|
Jul 24 22:54 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
bru
|
|
response 37 of 150:
|
Jul 24 23:14 UTC 2003 |
I have to wear the uniform to and from work. That includes wearing the gun.
I usually pick my wife up on the way home, which is why I asked if wearing
it intop the office would be a problem. So now I just sit out in the parking
lot and wait for her.
Mickey, don't be so sensetive.
Have I sloighted you because of your sexuality? Have I ever refused to deal
with you? Talk to you? Called you names?
Do I think your sexual inclinations are normal? No, and I never will.
I also don't approve of people who have sex outside of marriage.
Or with animals, or vegetables or with any other number of variations.
But I don't discriminate against them. I just think it wrong.
|
tod
|
|
response 38 of 150:
|
Jul 24 23:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 39 of 150:
|
Jul 24 23:30 UTC 2003 |
RE# 25
happyboy is a trip
|
rcurl
|
|
response 40 of 150:
|
Jul 25 00:50 UTC 2003 |
Re #37: you can say it is wrong for yourself, but you have no right to
consider it wrong for someone else. Since when have you been given rights
over others?
(Re #35: there's that jerk again with a "lot of mouth and bravado".)
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 41 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:00 UTC 2003 |
Re 38> I ignored most of this thread, but that comment made me laugh out loud.
Call me insensitive :P
|
bru
|
|
response 42 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:04 UTC 2003 |
No. I can say it is not normal for anybody. That it is wrong for people to
behave in certain ways. Thats what we do with our laws, we tell people that
what they are doing is wrong. Doesn't matter if it is sex, drugs, assault,
or murder.
You say it isn't illegal. That may be true, but it was at one time, adn
whether a law says it is illegal or not, it is wrong. many things are legal
that are wrong.
|
ea
|
|
response 43 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:06 UTC 2003 |
re #37 - ok, that makes sense. (Although, I agree with whoever earlier
said to wear the gun, it's part of your uniform, and you shouldn't have
to ask)
|
cross
|
|
response 44 of 150:
|
Jul 25 04:21 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
pvn
|
|
response 45 of 150:
|
Jul 25 04:32 UTC 2003 |
re#40*: THe US Constitution spells out the right of the individual
to tell other people what is right or wrong. It even establishes the
mechanism whereby it is done.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 46 of 150:
|
Jul 25 06:30 UTC 2003 |
Re #42: so, you consider it "wrong". Please tell us what precisely you
consider "wrong" with it. Please also don't obfuscate by saying it is not
"normal", or explain why you think it not normal while those that engage
consensually in homosexual activities find it perfectly normal. Do you
have personal experience with it to be able to judge whether it is
"normal" or not?
|
sabre
|
|
response 47 of 150:
|
Jul 25 11:34 UTC 2003 |
Ha Ha I will show up in MI faggot boy. YOU look like a wannabe surfer. I'm
6'3" at 215...all muscle. I will break your scrawny neck pretty boy. I'll tie
you up and let all the grex faggots buttfuck your pussy ass. I will walk up
to you without warning. I will smile and extend my hand as if in greeting but
I will use it to break your fucking jaw. New Yorkers are pussies..at least
most of them are. I can see from your faggot ass picture that it wouldn't take
much to have you cry like a baby.
heh heh...but we will see. After you get your ass beat remember this...You
shot your mouth off and your hummingbird ass couldn't cover it. Oh
yea...twenex confessed that he sucks cock..maybe you and him can have a "butt"
party. You look like you suck alot of cock yourself.
|
scott
|
|
response 48 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:10 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, sure, pussycat, and right now you're using the computer in the gym in
between sets on the lat machine?
|
gull
|
|
response 49 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:53 UTC 2003 |
Re #40: His uniform says he has rights over others, I suppose. I wonder
if he's stricter with people trying to cross the border if he thinks
they're "liberals".
|