|
Grex > Agora35 > #71: Don't take this the wrong way, but you kind of suck. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 79 responses total. |
jazz
|
|
response 25 of 79:
|
Oct 11 15:05 UTC 2000 |
I'm internally motivated when I've eaten too much Thai food. Whew!
|
flem
|
|
response 26 of 79:
|
Oct 12 00:09 UTC 2000 |
There are limits, IMO, to how far one should be internally motivated.
After much self-searching, I honestly believe that I'm happier when
people respect and *like* me than I would otherwise be. I think this
is a legitimate feeling, and not one that should be suppressed.
Now, if I were *incapable* of being happy unless *everyone* respected
and liked me, that would be less than optimal, indeed. Fortunately,
that is far from being the case.
|
jerryr
|
|
response 27 of 79:
|
Oct 12 11:21 UTC 2000 |
how far are you willing to go to garner that like and respect?
|
swa
|
|
response 28 of 79:
|
Oct 14 06:35 UTC 2000 |
Hmm. Fascinating question.
Until about three years ago, I'd've said something nearly identical to
gull's #11. Now... sorta. I've stopped bending over backwards to try
and make others like me. I eventually came to understand that basing my
self-worth on others was very, very bad for me, and not particularly
good for them, either. So. I'm not as obsessed with figuring out what
others think and trying to please them as I had been. Over the last
year or two I've made many decisions that I *know* displeased or
confused people who I care about. I decided, hey, I can live with
that. But I still felt sad about it. And on some level I still want
everyone to like me, and I end up being very shy of people I don't know
well because of this.
I think that, while obsessing over what others think may not be the best
approach, completely ignoring it may not be good either. The attitude
of beeswing's friend in #15 seems to be taking it too far, I'd think,
since others can provide helpful feedback and a different perspective
and so on, and therefore listening to them can be helpful. Not to
mention that not listening at all can make you a little remote from
people.
Re #8: I think that online people are real people. I also think that I
don't worry about their opinions of me as much as I do people I meet in
the alleged real world. Some of this is simply that a lot of the people
I see exclusively online are people I talk with only occasionally, and
will probably never end up knowing well, so there's a strangers-on-a-
plane feeling to it, I guess. A lot of it, though, is that seeing only
someone's words, rather than their tone of voice and facial cues and so
on, is "safer" somehow, and makes me less self-conscious. It's not that
I don't care what people here think of me so much as that it's much
easier to not let it worry me.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 29 of 79:
|
Oct 14 06:53 UTC 2000 |
l like to piss people off.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 30 of 79:
|
Oct 14 06:55 UTC 2000 |
So did your momma.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 31 of 79:
|
Oct 14 07:03 UTC 2000 |
true dat!
|
flem
|
|
response 32 of 79:
|
Oct 16 14:18 UTC 2000 |
re resp:27 -- That is, of course, an important question. As I said (well,
I don't think I actually said it, but I alluded to it), the ultimate goal of
my social interactions is to maximize my own happiness. This is a complex
goal with many subgoals, which have changed and are changing with experience.
For example, as I said, I find that I'm happier when other people like me.
But I've also found (the hard way, as I imagine most people do...) that I'm
*not* capable of being happy if *I* don't like me.
The answer to your question of how far I'll go to garner like and respect
is, essentially, that I try to act so as to incur a net gain in my own
happiness. (Whether I tend to work more towards long term net gains or short
term depends largely upon my mood. :) So, if doing something to garner
like and respect from others will cause me to dislike myself (or, more
realistically, contribute negatively toward my total opinion of myself), it
will probably result in a net loss of happiness, and I won't do it.
I consider myself "largely self-motivated" because my own opinion of
myself is almost certainly the largest single factor in my happiness
quotient (to neologize), but there are definitely other, even external,
factors.
|
edina
|
|
response 33 of 79:
|
Oct 17 01:43 UTC 2000 |
Hmmm . . .this will sound vain and pompous. I have a pretty good sense of
humor, I am pretty caring and loving, I am pretty easygoing . . .most people
do like me. I don't seem to have to work at it. But the other thing is, I
try to live my life fairly honestly - and I think people respond to that.
If I am having a bad day, I say, "Hey I am am in bitch mode." People respect
it and come back later.
|
iggy
|
|
response 34 of 79:
|
Oct 27 15:04 UTC 2000 |
the only people whose opinions matter to me, are of course myself and
hubby's.
it really does not matter if anyone else likes me or not.
b ut then again, a lot of you online folk intertwine your lives
so personally online that you become easy to manipulate.
you either like me because i *want* you to like me, or you hate me
because i *want* you to hate me.
i push a button here, and pull a string there, and TA-DA! you are
doing a nice little dance for me.
if you feel like your personal lives are out of control, then there is probably
a reason for
it. you stick an apple in your mouth, and throw yourselves on a silver
platter with a sign that says "come and get it!"
fools!
|
mooncat
|
|
response 35 of 79:
|
Oct 27 15:51 UTC 2000 |
Iggy- you say that other people's opinions don't matter to you. Okay,
I can buy that- but in real life (forgetting about this online
environment) do you prefer that people like you and think well of you,
or that they dislike you and think badly of you? This is slightly
different than the question you answered.
That and I don't think I've seen anyone here really complaining about
their personal lives being out of control. Maybe you've read something
in a comment that I've missed.
|
scott
|
|
response 36 of 79:
|
Oct 27 15:52 UTC 2000 |
Wow, textbook sociopathic attitude.
|
jor
|
|
response 37 of 79:
|
Oct 27 16:37 UTC 2000 |
Anne or Iggy?
|
scott
|
|
response 38 of 79:
|
Oct 27 16:45 UTC 2000 |
Iggy. Anne slipped in.
|
beeswing
|
|
response 39 of 79:
|
Oct 27 16:49 UTC 2000 |
Which is worse, being easily manipulated or making blatant attempts to
get attention/praise/criticism? Hmm.
|
ashke
|
|
response 40 of 79:
|
Oct 27 17:30 UTC 2000 |
Ditto Hmm. I wonder, if you try and manipulate someone, and t hey don't do
they way you want them to, do you say "I'm meant to do that" or do you just
shrug it off..
I think that everyone has a need to be recognized in a favorable light by
others around them. It's part of who we are, and we are conditioned to it
as children that doing something and getting a happy positive response from
others is good and makes us feel good, and even gets us stuff sometimes. As
we get older, we can try and determine how much impact it has on our concious
minds and reactions, but when someone smiles at you as you walk down the
stree, ot if someone passes you and comments on how nice you look, it makes
you feel good. And by the same token, if they glare at you in the grocery
line, or roll their eyes when you talk, or just avoid you, while you may shrug
it off, just like Pavlov's dogs, it still gets a reaction out of you.
I guess the honest question is, how do we break the conditioning or how do
we justify needing other people?
|
iggy
|
|
response 41 of 79:
|
Oct 27 17:30 UTC 2000 |
i wasnt after attention. i did not enter this item.
dance! dance for me, my little puppets!
|
mcnally
|
|
response 42 of 79:
|
Oct 27 20:02 UTC 2000 |
It's OK folks.. Nothing to see here, just move along..
|
beeswing
|
|
response 43 of 79:
|
Oct 27 20:25 UTC 2000 |
Yawn.
|
iggy
|
|
response 44 of 79:
|
Oct 28 12:40 UTC 2000 |
mcnally gets it.
|
mary
|
|
response 45 of 79:
|
Oct 28 14:36 UTC 2000 |
RE: #40's "I think that everyone has a need to be recognized in a
favorable light by others around them."
I'm not so sure that is true. It's probably closer to the mark for folks
who share the majority's opinions, don't have a strong sense of self, and
who need affiliation with a group to feel worthwhile. But certainly there
are those for whom this is not true - those who are so comfortable within
their own skins, who don't value compromise, who don't find the company of
others worth the effort, and who don't even want general social
acceptance. These folks aren't sociopaths. They may be called social
misfits by the group-at-large, but this is of no real concern to the
person involved.
These people make make great poets, scientists, explorers, heroes,
neighbors, teachers, and the best of friends.
Think of your best friends. The people whom you admire the most
and tend to really enjoy your company. They are probably the
ones who need your "acceptance" the least.
|
mary
|
|
response 46 of 79:
|
Oct 28 14:39 UTC 2000 |
Er, strike "neighbors". I don't know how that got in there.
These folks can make lowsy neighbors. ;-)
|
mary
|
|
response 47 of 79:
|
Oct 28 14:39 UTC 2000 |
Lousy.
|
janc
|
|
response 48 of 79:
|
Oct 28 19:48 UTC 2000 |
Well, some people strive to be recognized as likable people by their
neighbors, and some strive to be recognized as wild and free mavericks by
their neighbors.
|
scott
|
|
response 49 of 79:
|
Oct 28 22:20 UTC 2000 |
What I found rather disturbing about iggy's comments were the "Hey, emotions
are useful because I can use them to manipulate people" sentiment in #34.
When I hear that sort of thing I usually put those people into the "do NOT
ever trust these people" pigeonhole.
|