|
Grex > Agora35 > #132: Bush had a DUI conviction and never admitted to it | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 50 responses total. |
bdh3
|
|
response 25 of 50:
|
Nov 4 07:11 UTC 2000 |
You all are finding reasons that prove what you already know you ain't
gonna do, vote on the issues.
Bush, when busted apparently cooperated, pleaded quilty, and paid a
fine. Gore when busted said "there is no controlling legal authority'.
Gore's son was kicked out of his alma mater for drug dealing - so much
for parenting...
Gore, about the same time as Bush's driving deal said homosexuality was
a sin on many occasions. Gore said he was the inspiration for the novel
and film _Love Story_ -denied by the author. Gore said he invented the
Internet - oh sure and he didn't but what grandiosity...Gore is running
'attack ads' on HMOs conveniently forgetting it was the clintonistas
abortive attempt at a 'national health care plan' that caused the
problem in the first place.
Its time for a change, after eight years with little if anything to
point at - the best Gore can come up with is 'inventing the Internet'-,
after eight years when the first thing that comes to mind is cigars
followed by saxaphones, the second is US troopers murdered overseas
because the clintonistas put domestic politics first - wanna look good
instead of actually accomplishing anything. (You bet I figure
Al-the-Pal is nothing more than the continuation of the clintonista
regime.)
Its time for Bush, who promises to do even more 'hands off', a 'governs
least' style, but do so more for the direct benefit of the individual
citizens of this republic.
|
scott
|
|
response 26 of 50:
|
Nov 4 13:16 UTC 2000 |
Ouch, beedy is buying into the lies of the Bush campaign.
1. Gore *never* claimed to be the inspiration for "Love Story". Actually,
the author has said that Gore was indeed part of the inspiration.
Thought you were gonna vote on the issues, beedy.
|
jerryr
|
|
response 27 of 50:
|
Nov 4 14:43 UTC 2000 |
i'd hardly call 30 years-old "youthfull"
it bothers me that anyone drives drunk, but i wouldn't hang the shrub for his
bust 24 years ago. i do agree, that he showed poor judgement in not
disclosing something that was public record and obfuscating about it when
asked directly about ever being arrested. but, then again, he's a politician
and none of them walk on water without benefit of it being frozen.
|
md
|
|
response 28 of 50:
|
Nov 4 18:34 UTC 2000 |
[Pssst, jerryr, "obfuscate" means "darken, confuse, make obscure." If
you're looking for a synonym for "lie" that you can use every last
fuckin' time in the hope that people will think you're educated,
try "prevaricate."]
|
raven
|
|
response 29 of 50:
|
Nov 4 19:56 UTC 2000 |
You can vote for one of two proven liars, or you can vote for the man with
no youthful or recent indiscretions or lies on his record, Nader, your
choice.
|
scg
|
|
response 30 of 50:
|
Nov 4 20:29 UTC 2000 |
Woah, now you're arguing that Nader has never lied or done anything he
shouldn't have? Amazing.
I suspect the press just isn't paying as much attention to Nader.
|
raven
|
|
response 31 of 50:
|
Nov 4 21:44 UTC 2000 |
Well the evidence of both Bush and Gore's dirty hands is out there,
I have seen no eviddence so far of similar misdeeds by Nader who is
known to live an almost monastic lifestyle in a small aprtment.
|
polygon
|
|
response 32 of 50:
|
Nov 4 22:15 UTC 2000 |
Hmmm, I heard on CNN that the defense attorney who struck GWB's name
off the list of potential jurors later got appointed to the Texas
Supreme Court.
|
mikep
|
|
response 33 of 50:
|
Nov 5 02:58 UTC 2000 |
How's this for "honesty" and "integrity:"
http://www.lcr.org/press/20001025GorePhelps.htm
-----
Gore, who was quoted by the Nashville Tennessean in 1984 saying
homosexuality is not "an acceptable alternative that society should
affirm" and said in his 1984 U.S. Senate race that he would not accept
money from gay rights organizations and that he opposed a "gay bill of
rights," reportedly sought the support of the Phelps family in his 1988
presidential campaign, and invited the Phelps' to the Clinton-Gore
inaugurations of January 1993 and January 1997.
-----
http://www.sierratimes.com/artt103000.htm
Gore would appear to be a man who will say ANYTHING if he thinks it
will gain him political power.
|
brighn
|
|
response 34 of 50:
|
Nov 5 04:06 UTC 2000 |
while blasting his opponent for various sins Bush doesn't seem
able to list. ... > Steve, haven't you heard? Gore did hashish in Vietnam.
It must be true, I read it on Grex.
#33> Wow. The record will demonstrate that Gore was a friend of Phelps' before
Phelps started Godhatesfags.com... what a sin! Being acquainted with a bigot
years before he was a public bigot.
The Jews tried to bring Lieberman down because he made a remark about wanting
to meet with Farrakhan to talk things over. That didn't work, either.
Bring me a quote of Gore saying, "I've always been in favor of gay rights,"
or stop digging dirt up.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 35 of 50:
|
Nov 5 04:16 UTC 2000 |
I don't think saying (and believing) that homosexuality is not "an
acceptable alternative that society should affirm" is a bar to supporting
"gay rights."
|
jerryr
|
|
response 36 of 50:
|
Nov 5 13:28 UTC 2000 |
for the record: i use obfuscate because it conveys what i mean. duck, jive
and weave w/o telling outright lies.
*kiss*
|
bru
|
|
response 37 of 50:
|
Nov 5 17:17 UTC 2000 |
Lets not forget that Gore is a slum lord who only fixed what was wrong with
his rental property after it made national news. I have also heard that there
is another potentially damaging case involving Gore. I have written to one
of the parties involved and will hope to hear from them before tuesday if
there is any truth to the rumor. If I hear one way or the other, I will let
you know.
|
md
|
|
response 38 of 50:
|
Nov 5 17:21 UTC 2000 |
[Translation of #36: He doesn't know any better.]
There is a rumor making the rounds of the Muslim and Chaldean
communties that the Israelis intend to have Gore assasinated if he
becomes president so the US will have a Jewish, and presumably rabid
pro-Israel, president. This has been one weird election.
|
other
|
|
response 39 of 50:
|
Nov 5 18:49 UTC 2000 |
a rumor no doubt started by partisan supporters of Bush...
|
scg
|
|
response 40 of 50:
|
Nov 5 20:39 UTC 2000 |
re 37:
That was certainly the story told by Gore's tenants (who, in the
one press picture I saw of them were shown standing on their fron porch waving
their rifles around, and as such didn't strike me as all that "balanced").
Gore's answer was that he was a very hands off landlord, who hired a
management company to take care of his rental properties, and that the first
he had heard of the problems was when the tenants went to the press about it.
This strikes me as quite believable, given that I can't imagine the Vice
President of the US having much time to deal with being a landlord, and the
arrangement that a management company runs a property for a landlord is pretty
common. Gore then told the press and supposedly the tenants that he would
get the problems taken care of.
What happened next is where it got strange. The tenants went back to the
press, had their picture taken waving their guns around on the front porch,
and announced that the repair people Gore had sent had done a bad job.
Following that, somebody (I forget whether it was the Bush campaign or the
Republican Party) announced that they were helping the tenants move out of
Gore's house and into something better maintained. To make things stranger,
the new place was not in Carthage, Tennessee (where the Gore owned house was),
but in Lima, Ohio.
I've moved to get away from a bad landlord. It's certainly a reasonable thing
to do. I've also moved very long distances, including most recently last
summmer. However, moving to a different state just to get away from a bad
landlord seems very strange. I'm assuming there was some other motivation
for the move. Moving a long distance is expensive. When I wanted to move
from Michigan to California, the first step of the process was to find an
employer who would pay for the move, and still had to put down a fair amount
of my own money for things like the security deposit on my new place. Imagine
how much simpler it would have been if I could have just complained to the
press about my old landlord.
I think neither the Gore landlord story or the Bush drunk driving story is
all that significant compared to the other issues in the campaign. How the
candidates handled the stories may say more. In the case of Gore and his
tenants, Gore did at least appear to be trying to do something about the
situation. Maybe the repair people he sent didn't do a good job, but it
certainly would have been difficult to supervise them personally in the midst
of a Presidential campaign. Bush's handling of the drunk driving arrest
continues to bother me. Here's a guy who apparrently had a reputation for
driving drunk a lot in those days, and could presumably have killed somebody
had he not been lucky, saying that he paid a fine so it shouldn't be a big
deal.
|
teapot
|
|
response 41 of 50:
|
Nov 6 02:14 UTC 2000 |
Members of the Texas Supreme Court:
Chief Justice
Thomas R. Phillips
Serving Justices
Nathan L. Hecht
Craig T.Enoch
Priscilla R. Owen
James A. Baker
Greg Abbott
Deborah G. Hankinson
Harriet O'Neill
Alberto R. Gonzales
http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/#judges
|
bdh3
|
|
response 42 of 50:
|
Nov 6 03:47 UTC 2000 |
re#29: Isn't Nader gay? Although he is apparently very 'discrete'...
|
senna
|
|
response 43 of 50:
|
Nov 6 06:03 UTC 2000 |
That's too weird a rumor to be started by Republicans. Probably came from
somewhere else. Besides, if the Israelis assassinated Gore, and we had an
inkling of who it was, they'd probably never recover from the wave of
hostility, and, most likely, anti-semitism...
Thinking further about it, that sounds like a rumor that probably originated
from the groups it is supposedly circulating through. You know how that is.
|
polygon
|
|
response 44 of 50:
|
Nov 6 06:49 UTC 2000 |
Re 41. That's interesting, but I don't remember the name of the guy
who got Bush out of jury service. I was just repeating what I heard
on CNN, anyway.
Another source of confusion is that, as I understand it, Texas has
two Supreme Courts, one for civil cases and one for criminal cases.
|
scg
|
|
response 45 of 50:
|
Nov 6 08:13 UTC 2000 |
Would governors normally be allowed onto juries? The excuse in this case was
apparrently that if the guy was convicted and the appeals process had been
completely exhausted, the case would have then come before Bush looking for
a pardon, which sounds to me like a reasonable reason for him to not be wanted
on the jury. I also assume that lawyers wouldn't want people on the jury who
would be seen as authority figures, on the chance that the rest of the jury
might give what that person said greater weight.
|
polygon
|
|
response 46 of 50:
|
Nov 6 18:19 UTC 2000 |
Jerry Brown did jury duty when he was governor of California. Since he
had advocated and signed the bill that eliminated the automatic exemptions
from jury service, it was felt he would set a bad example by trying to get
out of it.
|
polygon
|
|
response 47 of 50:
|
Nov 6 18:23 UTC 2000 |
Also re 45. Some lawyers feel that letting another lawyer serve on a jury
amounts to malpractice, due to the assumption that a lawyer would have
greater influence. However, that notion is fading, and I have served
twice on juries since law school.
I commented to Brian Mackie, the prosecutor, how surprised I was that one
of his assistant prosecutors had let me serve on a jury, and he said "we
do that all the time." He mentioned a prominent local attorney who was a
juror in a murder case. It's not unthinkable any more.
|
aaron
|
|
response 48 of 50:
|
Nov 7 19:10 UTC 2000 |
The defense attorney in the case was David Wahlberg, who says that he
wanted to examine G.W. about his past record, but after a meeting in
chambers with G.W.'s general counsel, Alberto Gonzales, the issue of
clemency powers was raised, and he decided not to oppose Bush's recusal
because he felt it was in his client's best interest. It is Alberto
Gonzales who was later appointed to the Texas Supreme Court.
|
senna
|
|
response 49 of 50:
|
Nov 7 19:25 UTC 2000 |
It probably depends quite a bit on what kind of lawyer one is. A defense
attorney probably doesn't want an aggressive prosecutor sitting on their jury,
and vice versa.
|