|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 9 new of 33 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 25 of 33:
| 
Aug 14 20:37 UTC 2006 |
(I'd suggest emailing cfadm with those fw requests.)
|
furs
|
|
response 26 of 33:
|
Aug 14 22:56 UTC 2006 |
I thought you requested these kind of things here?
|
slynne
|
|
response 27 of 33:
|
Aug 15 01:30 UTC 2006 |
me too.
|
i
|
|
response 28 of 33:
|
Aug 15 03:59 UTC 2006 |
Generally, adding (a) fw(s) to or changing the subject of an existing cf
should start with clearly proposing the changes in the affected cf, so
the users can discuss the ideas, give feedback, etc. If favorably
received there after a week or so, then i'd be inclined to act favorably
on a formal request to go ahead with the changes.
Yes, i know that cmcgee is a fw of smallbusiness, and that cf hasn't been
overly active of late, but i don't see any reason to bypass the usual
"local democracy" procedures. In any case, anyone can start discussing
big business in the smallbusiness cf if they wish, and that might be a
good contribution to making the decision.
|
slynne
|
|
response 29 of 33:
|
Aug 15 21:40 UTC 2006 |
Fair enough.
|
scholar
|
|
response 30 of 33:
|
Aug 16 00:03 UTC 2006 |
yay!
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 31 of 33:
|
Aug 17 12:56 UTC 2006 |
Ok, we're talking over in small business.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 32 of 33:
|
Aug 30 22:44 UTC 2006 |
It's been a full 15 days, with several comments, all positive, over in the
small business conference.
Let's do it!
[change the name of the conference to Business, and add furs and slynne as
co-fws with me]
|
slynne
|
|
response 33 of 33:
|
Aug 31 02:45 UTC 2006 |
Yay!
|