| Grex > Oldcoop > #350: Minutes: Grex Board of Directors Meeting. Tuesday, July 25, 2006 |
| response 25 of 30: | 
Sep 9 00:39 UTC 2006 |
This is me caring
| response 26 of 30: |
Sep 9 16:46 UTC 2006 |
How much system resources are used if a user's mail is .forwarded to /dev/null, and can this be done as a default unless a user specifies (perhaps in a modified newuser) that he or she specifically wishes to receive email at Grex?
I there a better way to make spam to user accounts that are not used specifically for mail less of a drain on both Grex and the internet generally? (Bouncing would usually end up with an innocent spoof-victim receiving the bounce anyway.)
| response 27 of 30: |
Sep 24 14:31 UTC 2006 |
To use spamd instead of spamassassin would I simply change the line in my .procmailrc which contains spamassassin? I have set spamassassin to dump any mail with 3 rather than the default 5 points and so far no false positives. Some mail with only 1 point is spam, about half with 2-2.x points is spam.
| response 28 of 30: |
Sep 24 14:48 UTC 2006 |
Instead of piping into spamassassin, you'd pipe into spamc, like this: | /usr/local/bin/spamc
| response 29 of 30: |
Sep 24 17:45 UTC 2006 |
I will try it some time soon.
| response 30 of 30: |
Sep 24 17:51 UTC 2006 |
I changed spamassassin to spamc and I don't know if spamc is working but the rest of my filter (.procmailrc) still works. I sent three test mails and the one with viagra in it was caught by procmail. I should be catching a few real spams shortly.