|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 23 new of 47 responses total. |
gull
|
|
response 25 of 47:
| 
Oct 28 14:06 UTC 2003 |
<forget>
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 26 of 47:
|
Oct 28 15:32 UTC 2003 |
jp2 was born in Dayton? I thought his home-town was close to
Cincinatti?
|
davel
|
|
response 27 of 47:
|
Oct 28 15:46 UTC 2003 |
<forget>
|
jp2
|
|
response 28 of 47:
|
Oct 28 16:39 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 29 of 47:
|
Oct 28 18:06 UTC 2003 |
Ok
|
asddsa
|
|
response 30 of 47:
|
Oct 29 14:05 UTC 2003 |
I hope the staff remembers not to convict people soley on
circumstantial evidence.
|
styles
|
|
response 31 of 47:
|
Oct 31 06:34 UTC 2003 |
do you like my fist?
|
dah
|
|
response 32 of 47:
|
Oct 31 16:55 UTC 2003 |
I think jp2's account should be splatted. He at very least provided
the means for an anonymous attack on Grex.
|
jp2
|
|
response 33 of 47:
|
Oct 31 18:13 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
dah
|
|
response 34 of 47:
|
Oct 31 22:00 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
dah
|
|
response 35 of 47:
|
Oct 31 22:02 UTC 2003 |
jp2, if that were true, surely I'd be splattered by now. Frankly, you're the
only person who we know with absolute certainty is guilty.
|
glenda
|
|
response 36 of 47:
|
Oct 31 22:30 UTC 2003 |
Frankly, we know nothing of the sort. We only have your word for it, and
frankly, I don't trust you any more than I do Mr. Bush.
|
cross
|
|
response 37 of 47:
|
Oct 31 22:57 UTC 2003 |
Regarding #35; Sorry, that was just lack of time. Of course, dah won't be
able to read this, as I've locked his account for vandalizing jp2's. It
seemed pretty obvious that he was the culprit. Perhaps if he asks nicely
and promises to behave like a big boy, we'll unlock it.
There's a lesson in this. If you're going to be juvenile enough to
vandalize someone else's account, at least be careful to cover your
tracks. That includes your test `probes' in the target user's directory.
|
scholar
|
|
response 38 of 47:
|
Oct 31 23:12 UTC 2003 |
Sorry, but the dah account isn't locked. Try again.
|
cross
|
|
response 39 of 47:
|
Nov 1 00:53 UTC 2003 |
Yes it is. Perhaps the dah user isn't (but then, we all knew you'd
come back and login again, didn't we?).
|
scholar
|
|
response 40 of 47:
|
Nov 1 01:18 UTC 2003 |
No, the account simply isn't locked.
|
cross
|
|
response 41 of 47:
|
Nov 1 01:41 UTC 2003 |
Yes, it really is.
|
salad
|
|
response 42 of 47:
|
Nov 4 22:49 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
salad
|
|
response 43 of 47:
|
Nov 4 22:51 UTC 2003 |
re 37 you locked more than just dah's account. Or have you forgotten?
|
twenex
|
|
response 44 of 47:
|
Nov 18 17:19 UTC 2003 |
What an utterly useless item and a waste of space.
Looks like dah created it in his own image.
|
mfp
|
|
response 45 of 47:
|
Sep 22 02:27 UTC 2004 |
Point.
|
naftee
|
|
response 46 of 47:
|
Sep 24 06:13 UTC 2004 |
Almost a year later.
|
jesuit
|
|
response 47 of 47:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|