|
Grex > Oldcoop > #166: Agenda: Grex Board of Directors Meeting Monday, April 12, 2004 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 20 new of 44 responses total. |
lowclass
|
|
response 25 of 44:
| 
Apr 14 02:37 UTC 2004 |
It's just as possible she thought the hassle of getting the web ad ON
arborweb, possibly at cost to HER, just wasn't worth the shit she put up with
at work.
(no, that is NOT an endorsement of her behavior as a staff
memeber.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 26 of 44:
|
Apr 14 12:20 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
lowclass
|
|
response 27 of 44:
|
Apr 15 02:06 UTC 2004 |
I DIDN'T say she was embezzeling from her employer. On the other hand,
she might have worked a partial non-monetary compensation deal that included
the website FOR GREX, at no charge TO GREX, as a favor She was willing to
provide at that time.
I ALSO think she was MORE than entitled to erase HER contributions to
the BABY diary/ LA LECHE stuff, but didn't have the right to erase anyone
ELSES responses. For that matter, Jep was within HIS rights to erase HIS
entries in his divorce journal, as long as he didin't mess with whatever
anybody ELSE posted in response.
Either way, it would have looked fairly wierd, post-cvensor, but it
would have been the right way, within ethics, to do it. THAT'S what i think.
`Unless you, or anybody else, feels COMPELLED to demand I think
something else.
(beleive me, that would get interesting. very, VERY interesting.)
|
tod
|
|
response 28 of 44:
|
Apr 15 16:24 UTC 2004 |
echo ECHO ECHO
|
remmers
|
|
response 29 of 44:
|
Apr 15 19:30 UTC 2004 |
Re #27: I agree and would liked to have seen the items restored, minus
any responses that their authors wanted taken out. However, the
membership voted otherwise (more than once).
|
tod
|
|
response 30 of 44:
|
Apr 15 19:41 UTC 2004 |
The membership vote for censorship then, right?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 31 of 44:
|
Apr 15 19:46 UTC 2004 |
If that's what you're calling it, then, I believe they are.
|
tod
|
|
response 32 of 44:
|
Apr 15 20:25 UTC 2004 |
Why is the blue "free speech" ribbon on the website if the membership is on
the record as condoning censorship?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 33 of 44:
|
Apr 15 21:33 UTC 2004 |
Because some grexers prefer to pretend they have principles rather than vote
to support them.
|
soup
|
|
response 34 of 44:
|
Apr 16 01:13 UTC 2004 |
Right, as long as 'they' don't call it for what it is, it remains legal.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 35 of 44:
|
Apr 16 16:52 UTC 2004 |
The all-or-nothing crowd continues to bay away...
|
cyklone
|
|
response 36 of 44:
|
Apr 16 20:43 UTC 2004 |
Maybe I'm missing your point, but how is supporting the right of an
individual to remove his or her posts while also maintaining that
individual should not be permitted to remove the posts of others "all or
nothing"? In fact, it is the most reasonable middle ground.
|
tod
|
|
response 37 of 44:
|
Apr 16 22:01 UTC 2004 |
Its a personality issue for these folks that are voting in favor of
censorship. I can't imagine any other reason why.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 38 of 44:
|
Apr 17 04:05 UTC 2004 |
Limited imagination, I guess.
|
soup
|
|
response 39 of 44:
|
Apr 17 05:22 UTC 2004 |
Bad guess.
|
tod
|
|
response 40 of 44:
|
Apr 18 15:33 UTC 2004 |
re #38
Why don't you explain why folks are voting in favor of censorship. Enlighten
me.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 41 of 44:
|
Apr 28 16:10 UTC 2004 |
re #40 Because it will shut people up.
|
jp2
|
|
response 42 of 44:
|
Apr 28 23:06 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 43 of 44:
|
Apr 29 01:01 UTC 2004 |
Voting against restoration will shut people up?!?!?! That's wishful thinking
if ever I've heard it.
|
jesuit
|
|
response 44 of 44:
|
May 17 02:15 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|