You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-39         
 
Author Message
15 new of 39 responses total.
jp2
response 25 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 11:42 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad
response 26 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 17:06 UTC 2004

re 23 I've had several accounts locked in the past, and _EVERY TIME_ that I've
contacted staff, they've either said diddly to me on why they did it, or blamed
it on polytarp.
albaugh
response 27 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 19:29 UTC 2004

Let's try to make this simple for you #%^&#%-heads, shall we:  grex is showing
that it is run in a fairly reasonable matter, with some things carried out
seat of the pants, some by rule of thumb, some by hard & fast policy.
Reasonable grexers accept this, are happy for generally reasonable people
(staff) to make value judgments.  Unreasonable people (you know who you are)
simply try to waste a lot of everyone's time by engaging in these tiresome
"meta" discussions instead of "true" grexing.

Whine all you want to, bay at the moon in frustration.  Nobody cares that your
accounts are getting canceled - in fact they're quite pleased to see it
happen.  Type away if it amuses you.  We just don't care.  And we're happy
the way things are run, thank you.

For perhaps the first time ever a staff went rogue.  But that has passed now,
and reasonable people have gotten over it.  You should try it sometime...
tod
response 28 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 19:32 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad
response 29 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 19:40 UTC 2004

re 27
>For perhaps the first time ever a staff went rogue.  But that has passed now,
 and reasonable people have gotten over it.  You should try it sometime...

On that subject?  Never.  It was wrong, and it is still wrong.
twenex
response 30 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 21:07 UTC 2004

Well tod, i consider myself a thinker, and I agree with albaugh. In the
absence of supernatural abilities, one must do the best one can in the
circumstances. That necessarily entails some ad-hoc filling in of the blanks,
interpretation, and pragmatism.

On the complacency note, though, right on.
tod
response 31 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 21:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

twenex
response 32 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 21:21 UTC 2004

Nor did I say that you were.
salad
response 33 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 22:43 UTC 2004

Some people consider him a twit for asking questions, though.
atlantic
response 34 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 22:55 UTC 2004

DON"T FEED THE TITS!
jp2
response 35 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 00:02 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 36 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 00:06 UTC 2004

I was not aware that Kevin was on staff.
jp2
response 37 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 00:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 38 of 39: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 21:41 UTC 2004

Yeah, don't confuse me with that "evil" staff!  :-)  (I'm not worthy...)
jesuit
response 39 of 39: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   25-39         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss