You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-32         
 
Author Message
8 new of 32 responses total.
nharmon
response 25 of 32: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 15:38 UTC 2010

I am not a full-time programmer, and might work on 3 or 4 programming
projects per year. In between that time, I lose a lot of familiarity
with languages, and so for me an important feature of any programming
text editor is syntax checking, and text highlighting.

re 2: I've been checking out SciTE, and so far am liking it quite a bit.
remmers
response 26 of 32: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 17:57 UTC 2010

Syntax-highlighting is useful to me as well.  Both emacs and vim do a
reasonably good job of it.
kentn
response 27 of 32: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 18:03 UTC 2010

What is nice is being able to "tweak" the syntax highlighting for a
language.  Again, emacs and vim do a pretty job of that, too.  Some
editors have syntax highlighting but it is very limited in what it can
do.  Having the ability to add a new language for highlighting is also a
good feature.  Not all editors support that.
bellstar
response 28 of 32: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 20:52 UTC 2010

Re #25:

I dropped jEdit into the RHEL installation I have at work and am enjoying its
nice directory browser pane :-) Had to replace gcj with Sun's own for it to
run. Sadly, text rendering is painfully slow when I turn on font smoothing.
dtk
response 29 of 32: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 02:34 UTC 2013

When I am working in a text-only environment, such as an SSH session, or
if I am doing a quick edit that does not justify starting a full
programming editor, I tend to revert back to VI. When I am working on
something larger, I usually revert to Komodo (Active State). It works
well, is the same in Windows or Linux, and is language-aware, without
being the bloated monster that is Jedit/Eclipse/Rational RSA. I also
like that it doesn't force you into the model of a project, if all you
are working on is a single code or a single module. 
kentn
response 30 of 32: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 15:58 UTC 2013

How much does Komodo cost now?
dtk
response 31 of 32: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 22:25 UTC 2013

resp: 30 - The editor-only version (which is still pretty
fully-featured)  is free. The IDE version, which integrates debugging,
source code  management and a few other features is about 300$ as of Jan
2013. I have  been happy with the free version.   -DTK
kentn
response 32 of 32: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 22:52 UTC 2013

Yeah, I'd prefer the IDE for Perl work, but $300 is quite a bit
for an IDE, although it does come with some other tools that
are useful, so that makes it more worth it if you have the need.
 0-24   25-32         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss