|
Grex > Coop > #336: The TSTY agenda for Grex Board, 2013 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 11 new of 35 responses total. |
jep
|
|
response 25 of 35:
| 
Feb 11 03:20 UTC 2013 |
Nine people voted for the open Board of Directors seat. How many were
from outside the conferencing system? In what way did they care about that?
I don't know how to reach those people. I don't know how to communicate
with them about the things they care about, and the things I care about.
I don't have anything against them, but I don't know any way to receive
information about their concerns than to speculate in a void, which I
decline to do.
Deprecate the conferencing system? To what end? In what way? Do you
mean to turn control of Grex over to them? How is that going to work?
It is what I care about. It is what the people I know care about.
|
tod
|
|
response 26 of 35:
|
Feb 14 05:41 UTC 2013 |
Are there 9 people in bbs?
|
cross
|
|
response 27 of 35:
|
Feb 14 21:43 UTC 2013 |
resp:25 I don't know. But I think that Joe Gelinas said how many were not
members.
|
jep
|
|
response 28 of 35:
|
Feb 15 14:13 UTC 2013 |
It's hard to jump on that bandwagon without a little more information,
Dan.
|
cross
|
|
response 29 of 35:
|
Feb 15 14:58 UTC 2013 |
resp:28 The information is there, I just don't have it to hand. Nor am I
the definitive source.
|
tsty
|
|
response 30 of 35:
|
Feb 15 17:24 UTC 2013 |
thank you grex voters ... in agora (?48) are my first thought on how to raise
the grex profile as well as attract more users.
they are admittedly primative but i do believe they are in teh better
direction than just standing still.
|
jep
|
|
response 31 of 35:
|
Feb 15 17:57 UTC 2013 |
TS, can you enter a new item to discuss your ideas? It'd make it easier
than sending everyone to another item when you're not sure what the item
number is. Anyway, then there'd be a separate item, not one started for
something else.
|
tod
|
|
response 32 of 35:
|
Feb 16 18:21 UTC 2013 |
A facebook ad doesn't hurt so long as you make it obvious what you're
peddling.
|
lkjh
|
|
response 33 of 35:
|
Feb 17 23:26 UTC 2013 |
re 31 .. ummm, thought the point er to 48 was a separate item .... ?
|
jep
|
|
response 34 of 35:
|
Feb 18 01:57 UTC 2013 |
TS, it turns out "item 48" is in a separate conference. How was anyone
to know that?
|
tsty
|
|
response 35 of 35:
|
Mar 11 15:12 UTC 2013 |
oops, my bad --- even i didn;t recognize that i had NOT specified the right
.cf. i;ll be more carefull inthe future.
|