|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 16 new of 40 responses total. |
richard
|
|
response 25 of 40:
|
Feb 26 18:27 UTC 2010 |
Whitelisting is not necessary. Grex should simply do away with the
mail server altogether. It is clearly not necessary for Grex to offer
free email anymore.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 26 of 40:
|
Feb 26 20:34 UTC 2010 |
It's not /necessary/ for us to do anything.
|
kentn
|
|
response 27 of 40:
|
Feb 26 22:47 UTC 2010 |
Okay, so what would be some services to offer that Grex users would
appreciate?
In my opinion, even though e-mail is available elsewhere, it is still
very handy for communicating with staff and others when on Grex without
the need to go elsewhere to send a message. Having people go elsewhere
to do things is apt to mean they get in the habit of not using Grex for
anything.
|
tsty
|
|
response 28 of 40:
|
Feb 26 22:47 UTC 2010 |
re 25 . sorry richard , your blineders are too tight ... grex actualyy
does need to offer email. it is not necesary, howeer, for yo to suggest
sttrangling grex services ... and grex,.
|
tonster
|
|
response 29 of 40:
|
Feb 27 00:30 UTC 2010 |
I'd be curious to know why grex NEEDS to offer email. m-net survived
for several years without offering email and few people complained. I
brought it back up a few weeks ago and so far over 60 people have signed
up, so there is a desire to have an address, but I don't think it's an
essential component. That said, I agree it's a nice thing to offer and
that's why I've offered to host email similarly. veek has offered
another method, which while it's not the method I'd use, I can't fault
him for wanting to do it that way and it's another option.
|
richard
|
|
response 30 of 40:
|
Feb 27 03:54 UTC 2010 |
perhaps grex could simply eliminate offsite email. Maintain email for
communicating betweem users of this site only. surely ts that is the
only need for grex to offer email to communicate with its users.
please do tell for what other purpose grex must offer email?
|
veek
|
|
response 31 of 40:
|
Feb 27 06:28 UTC 2010 |
1. Guy who wants to learn UNIX, check mail headers, telnet port 25,
type commands, and try the various Postfix commands.
2. DIY guy has a bunch of friends in the DIY community that he wants to
keep in touch with BUT doesn't want to create a Yahoo account - he
invites them over to Grex and uses party, bbs and.. grex mail to keep
in touch.
3. Free publicity for Grex. People exchange email ID's all the time and
that clues other ppl in.
|
tsty
|
|
response 32 of 40:
|
Feb 27 08:04 UTC 2010 |
re 31 .. not only what veek said, grex is a safe site for captive nations.
|
cross
|
|
response 33 of 40:
|
Mar 3 13:02 UTC 2010 |
resp:32 That's simply not true. If a foreign power wants to get root on
grex and read the emails of one of their nationals, they'll find a way.
The reality is that Grex doesn't *need* to offer email. But we've managed
to scale it back enough that it's a relatively low-bandwidth thing and I'm
not sure I see any harm in having it available as an opt-in (which it
basically is now). As far as whitelists go, I believe the current spam
assassin configuration already allows for that, no?
|
veek
|
|
response 34 of 40:
|
Mar 4 02:35 UTC 2010 |
Spamassasin would entail accepting the whole email and then white-
listing it, unless you use a system-whitelist. Also, what about
outbound flood? The postfix-policyserver thingy rejects much earlier in
the game (just after the connection is opened and after the rcpt to) I
vaguely remember ppl saying that email was turned off because SPAM was
taking up bandwidth (and we were using spamassasin back then).
So.. the current status is that we have full mail access (send to
Yahoo, receive from Yahoo, send local email), but ppl have to ask for
it? Who do they have to contact for e-mail to be enabled? Staff?
staff@grex.org??
Again, all this is because if we invite a few ppl in here (once
everything is ready).. I don't want them to bump into problems.
Basically a lot of this (mysql, mail) just needs to be clarified.. The
website: http://cyberspace.org/email.xhtml doesn't explicitly state that
people need to ask for email.. it just states:
------------
Grex provides free email accounts to anyone who wants one. This service
is made available in the spirit of improving everyone's ability to
communicate with others.
Once you have a Grex account, your Email address is either
accountname@grex.org or accountname@cyberspace.org. You may use
whichever address you prefer.
Grex does not support POP mail or Web-based mail.
<SNIP>
Once you have connected by telnet and logged in, you can use any of the
mail clients available on Grex. Currently, we support pine, elm, and
mail.
--------
|
kentn
|
|
response 35 of 40:
|
Mar 4 03:57 UTC 2010 |
Yes, I'm using a short whitelist right now with spamassassin. And a
very short blacklist. As to whether it works, it's hard to say right
now. I still get spam which spamassassin almost always throws out
correctly.
|
cross
|
|
response 36 of 40:
|
Mar 5 14:05 UTC 2010 |
Then we should update the web pages.
|
kentn
|
|
response 37 of 40:
|
Mar 5 15:06 UTC 2010 |
I don't think that we want a system-wide whitelist or a system-wide
blacklist. It'd be better to leave what gets tossed out to the
individual. That's just my opinion, though.
Most corporate spam software just puts potential spam in a separate
location and informs the user so they can decide if it's a false
positive. If the user doesn't rescue the message in a certain amount of
time, it gets nuked. Of course, I have no idea how much egregious spam
is deleted before that point.
Definitely the web pages need updating (it's a never-ending job, I'm
sure). We need to have them be in line with what we are offering and
with our policies. Making it easier for new users to find what they
need would help if it isn't obvious already.
Having easy to follow instructions for beginners is a great idea. I
think Grex offered some sort of help manual in the past. Perhaps, in
addition to the web page updates, that manual needs updating?
Here's an on-line spamassassin configuration generator for users:
http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php
I don't know how useful that is, but it might help (or it might let
people shoot themselves in the foot more easily).
Oh, and from what I've read about spamassassin whitelisting, it doesn't
reject e-mails from people not in the whitelist per se, it gives e-mails
from the whitelist addresses a very low spam score (-100) so that it is
unlikely they will be marked as spam. Thus, e-mails still go through
the usual spam filtering.
|
tod
|
|
response 38 of 40:
|
Mar 6 01:27 UTC 2010 |
Can't you folks say "yes-no list" instead of conjuring up racial images?
|
kentn
|
|
response 39 of 40:
|
Mar 6 01:29 UTC 2010 |
Heh. Read the man page. Of course the word assassin is in there too, so
that conjures up other images, I'm sure.
|
kentn
|
|
response 40 of 40:
|
Mar 6 01:39 UTC 2010 |
100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST From: address is in the user's black-list
Okay, so it finally hit one from my list and gave it 100 points.
Guaranteed spam, almost.
|