|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 9 new of 33 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 25 of 33:
| 
Apr 2 07:00 UTC 2006 |
You omitted the first sentence from the web page, which reads "... carbon
dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas".
|
tod
|
|
response 26 of 33:
|
Apr 2 12:12 UTC 2006 |
Methane.s relatively short atmospheric lifetime, coupled with its potency as
a greenhouse gas, makes it a candidate for mitigating global warming over the
near-term (i.e., next 25 years or so).
|
rcurl
|
|
response 27 of 33:
|
Apr 3 15:39 UTC 2006 |
Methane makes a secondary, and decreasing, contribution to global warming,
but it would be of some use to control it. But how can natural methane
production be controlled?
|
klg
|
|
response 28 of 33:
|
Apr 3 16:12 UTC 2006 |
Is that a scientific fact, or just your opinion?
|
tod
|
|
response 29 of 33:
|
Apr 3 21:07 UTC 2006 |
re #27
No more rice
|
rcurl
|
|
response 30 of 33:
|
Apr 4 05:01 UTC 2006 |
Not practical. How about no more gasoline?
|
tod
|
|
response 31 of 33:
|
Apr 4 05:31 UTC 2006 |
You mean petroleum? Like no more pesticides, plastics, nor lubricants for
machinery? Yea, good luck with that.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 32 of 33:
|
Apr 4 05:34 UTC 2006 |
Like, no more food for Asians? Yea, good luck with that. (And I did say
g a s o l i n e. Dont know how you thought that started with a p.)
|
tod
|
|
response 33 of 33:
|
Apr 4 17:56 UTC 2006 |
re #32
I guess we're doomed by China then. ;)
|