|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 19 new of 43 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 25 of 43:
| 
Nov 7 17:43 UTC 2003 |
How much would you like to bet on your prognostication, tsty? I would
bet that you can't be trusted that far.
|
tsty
|
|
response 26 of 43:
|
Nov 8 08:54 UTC 2003 |
got $1000 to back that up? ($500 if it's only hillary ...clark is
interchangable as necesasry.)
of course she';ll lose -- but she'l run.
|
russ
|
|
response 27 of 43:
|
Nov 8 20:14 UTC 2003 |
Funny that TS implies he has $1000 to place on a political
question, but not $400 for the question of whether he stole
my guitar or not.
Do you think he just *might* not believe what he says?
|
slynne
|
|
response 28 of 43:
|
Nov 9 19:12 UTC 2003 |
HAHAHAHA. I know, it *is* funny! I can hardly stop laughing
|
flem
|
|
response 29 of 43:
|
Nov 10 17:33 UTC 2003 |
I think we need a new version of Godwin's law for grex: Cage's law.
You know a thread is over when someone brings up The Guitar. :)
|
mcnally
|
|
response 30 of 43:
|
Nov 10 17:40 UTC 2003 |
I propose McNally's postulate -- any discussion which goes on
long enough will eventually be ended by Cage's law.
I have discovered a truly remarkable demonstration of this
proposition, but don't have time to set it down just now.. :-)
|
tsty
|
|
response 31 of 43:
|
Nov 11 09:42 UTC 2003 |
funnier that rcurl ahs not yet entered a respoonse .... russ's 'guitar'
is akin to jerryr's shoes.
rcurl is lots mroe appreciated, infact. well, jerryr's shoes are too, fwiw.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 32 of 43:
|
Nov 11 18:01 UTC 2003 |
You answered my question. Any of the betting sort can take you up on it -
would you put that $1000 into escrow now to await the outcome?
|
tod
|
|
response 33 of 43:
|
Nov 11 21:29 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tsty
|
|
response 34 of 43:
|
Nov 14 07:35 UTC 2003 |
ummmmmmmmm....................
#97.25 Rane Curl (rcurl) Fri, Nov 7, 2003 (12:43):
How much would you like to bet ...... <xnip>
i took *you* up on *your* challenge - hull0?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 35 of 43:
|
Nov 14 18:54 UTC 2003 |
Right, now let's discuss escrow.
|
i
|
|
response 36 of 43:
|
Nov 16 02:31 UTC 2003 |
I've heard that Hillary is still rather passionately hated by a big
hunk of the Republican base, and calculated use of her name is a
very well established way to fire up that base and stimulate their
financial contribution to GOP causes...
...and she's similarly loved by/inspiring to parts of the Democratic
base, and well-used there.
For folks outside of the "I LUV CLINTON" fan club, does Hillary have
anything on her resume in the way of executive experience or political
leadership? Maggie had 20 years in Parliament, 4 years in an under-
secretary of state post, and 4 years as leader of her political party
before becoming PM. Golda's resume was, if anything, heavier still.
What's Hillary got?
|
scott
|
|
response 37 of 43:
|
Nov 16 04:14 UTC 2003 |
What's dubya got on his resume?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 38 of 43:
|
Nov 16 07:04 UTC 2003 |
Not much, by presidential standards, and look what a disaster he's
turned out to be. Which only underscores why it might be dangerous
choosing a candidate of comparable experience from the left..
|
tsty
|
|
response 39 of 43:
|
Nov 16 07:45 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 40 of 43:
|
Nov 17 14:45 UTC 2003 |
re: "#38 (mcnally): Not much, by presidential standards. . ."
The reference here being to Mssrs. Carter & Bubba, Mr. mcnally?
|
gull
|
|
response 41 of 43:
|
Nov 17 15:56 UTC 2003 |
Re #36: I wouldn't vote for Hillary in a primary election.
|
tsty
|
|
response 42 of 43:
|
Nov 18 06:42 UTC 2003 |
re #39 ... sorry, that was cruel, i recall taht response, my error.
about escrow ... make a sugestion ... we can debate right ehre.
|
willcome
|
|
response 43 of 43:
|
Nov 27 08:13 UTC 2003 |
whore.
|