You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-36         
 
Author Message
12 new of 36 responses total.
gull
response 25 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 20:46 UTC 2003

I suppose, if you also assume clotted cream and kidney pie are works of
evil.

But really, people's interest in the British royal family isn't about a
monarchy any more than people's interest in Michael Jackson is about
music.  It's about celebrity and fame.  There's a certain set of people
that are famous for being famous, and not much else, and people love to
read tittilating stories about people like that.
tod
response 26 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 21:29 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

twenex
response 27 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 21:33 UTC 2003

Chuck? rotflmao.

Who needs to spend 10,000 quid on a wedding anywa? I believe that's
the average figure round here.

Re: 26: Yeah, I would agree with that.The Monarchy these days is hiugh
drama. People blame the newspapers/tabloids, but seem to forget that
if people didn't want to be able to read the drivel that gets painted
about Royals/Jackson/JFK Conspiraciy Theories/Little Green Men/Faked
Moon Landings, the papers wouldn't be able to sell copy with those
stories in.
tod
response 28 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 22:17 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mary
response 29 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 22:19 UTC 2003

I've known a Peruvian who when asked what he was would
answer, "American".  I thought it was a good response.
And USian would be fine in my book.
md
response 30 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 23:52 UTC 2003

[You've known a native Peruvian, who was a citizen of Peru living in 
Peru, who when asked what he was said, "I'm an American"?  I mean, for 
reasons other than to be tedious?]

The first people to be called Americans were the aboriginal inhabitants 
of the Americas.  (My ancestors, or at least some of them.)  They were 
always, until at least the beginning of the 18th century, the 
only "Americans."  Then, in the early 18th century, people in England 
started referring to the denizens of their colonies across the Atlantic 
as "Americans."  

I've always thought there was something a little ironic about the 
usage, maybe even condescending.  But the name stuck, which ought to 
suprise no one.  The colonists began referring to themselves 
as "Americans."  After they declared their independence, they continued 
to be called "Americans," by themselve, by the Brits, by the 
continental Europeans, and by just about everybody else except my 
ancestors.  

And here we are, stuck with the usage.  It will change with time, as 
language always does, but not in the lifetime of any of the peeved non-
readers of history posting here.
mary
response 31 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 00:05 UTC 2003

I don't think anyone here is peeved.  The Peruvian I knew who had fun
with the usage wasn't peeved.  He was mostly just having fun with
the responses he'd get.  He would have loved yours, by the way.
russ
response 32 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 14:06 UTC 2003

If only "Unitedstatesian" rolled easily off the tongue,
we wouldn't be having this discussion.
scott
response 33 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 14:49 UTC 2003

Frank Lloyd Wright created the name "Usonian" for some of his "local United
States" designs.

OK, that covers my daily elitist reference requirement. 

Except that Wright actually intended the Usonian houses to be affordable,
which of course they weren't.

Hah!  Extra credit.
twenex
response 34 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 15:26 UTC 2003

Maybe you could all use hte Spanish term, "estadounidense". Sounds
quite nice, too.

Interestingly, I was watching an episode of the 60s Estadounidense
comedy "Bewitched", today. It was the one about the Stevens' baby
daughter, Tabitha, being able to speak "The King's English", as they
called it on the tv. Which suggests that at that time, America stil
thought of British English as the standard, and is also interesting
because, when there is a Queen (as there has been since 1953), just
about everything that was called "King's" is then referred to as
"Queen's", - "the Queen's English", etc. (names of pubs, universities,
and regiments dedicated to a particular king being exceptions).
other
response 35 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 16:08 UTC 2003

Re: Estadounidense.  I think it would be generally more fitting to 
drop the 'estado' part, and just call us Unidense.  Of course, the 
fact that some of us are more unidense than others goes without 
saying...  ;)
twenex
response 36 of 36: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 16:21 UTC 2003

Heh.
 0-24   25-36         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss