|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 15 new of 39 responses total. |
polytarp
|
|
response 25 of 39:
|
Jul 17 03:45 UTC 2003 |
Stop spamming, scum.
|
gull
|
|
response 26 of 39:
|
Jul 17 13:51 UTC 2003 |
Re #24: How many times are you going to cut-and-paste this?
|
mvpel
|
|
response 27 of 39:
|
Jul 17 18:41 UTC 2003 |
I posted it where it's apropos, which happened to be two different items.
Is anyone going to comment on it and its implications for a lasting peace
between Israel and its enemies?
|
scott
|
|
response 28 of 39:
|
Jul 17 18:47 UTC 2003 |
Well, my comment would be that with this sort thing being passed off as
"discussion" then Israel/Palestine is probably in for another 40 years of
conflict.
|
bis
|
|
response 29 of 39:
|
Aug 1 05:49 UTC 2003 |
R #6 ... Does anybody need moer proof than the wall that SHARON is building
in Israel; Isn't that NAZI Behavior?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 30 of 39:
|
Aug 1 12:40 UTC 2003 |
Not actually. The NAZIS tended to drive around walls rapidly with their
tanks. Building them wasn't so much a NAZI thing.
|
tod
|
|
response 31 of 39:
|
Aug 1 17:42 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 32 of 39:
|
Aug 2 12:34 UTC 2003 |
While I can understand why the Palestinians are against the idea, I
think it is probably a good idea. If a wall is what it takes to make
Israelis feel secure, it probably will end up being good for the
Palestinians in the long run. Besides, if a time comes when it is no
longer necessary, it can be torn down.
|
lk
|
|
response 33 of 39:
|
Aug 3 21:39 UTC 2003 |
Lynne might be surprised to find me disagreeing with the above, but I'm
actually just quibbling. (:
A wall isn't what it takes to make Israelis feel secure. It's what can provide
security (not just a "feeling", as can be seen from the success of a similar
security fence in Gaza) in the absence of a Palestinian Authority with the
backbone to prevent terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians and due to the
reality of neighboring governments (e.g. Syria & Iran) who support terrorism
because they are not interested in ending the violence and peacefully
coexisting.
|
slynne
|
|
response 34 of 39:
|
Aug 4 01:57 UTC 2003 |
Ok. A fence is a reasonable defensive measure.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 35 of 39:
|
Aug 4 15:33 UTC 2003 |
If they can't get along with each other, a big fence is probably a good idea.
Maybe it should be garrisoned by neutral troops, with orders to shoot anyone
who tries to cross in either direction with a weapon.
|
tod
|
|
response 36 of 39:
|
Aug 4 16:34 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 37 of 39:
|
Aug 4 17:16 UTC 2003 |
I think it should be patrolled... by NINJAS!!!
|
tod
|
|
response 38 of 39:
|
Aug 4 17:31 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 39 of 39:
|
Aug 12 20:30 UTC 2003 |
Math joke:
They're going to build a fence around Israel and then declare themselves
to be on the outside.
|