You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   24-28         
 
Author Message
5 new of 28 responses total.
n8nxf
response 24 of 28: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 18:36 UTC 1997

Beyond me.  (Much is..)  How can four arbitrary lines on an almost
-sphere (earth) be considered corners?  Since rotation is a linear
function, much less a four state digital one, how can it have four
mid-days, mid-nights, etc?  Being linear I think it would have
infinite "corners".  How does the assignment of 1 day Greenwich
time doom future youth and nature to hell?
 
I must not be in a Cubic state of mind.
rcurl
response 25 of 28: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 20:13 UTC 1997

He'll give you $1,000 if you prove him wrong.
n8nxf
response 26 of 28: Mark Unseen   Oct 29 13:21 UTC 1997

I don't even understand what he's saying.  I couldn't prove him wrong
OR right ;-)
srw
response 27 of 28: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 04:48 UTC 1997

Disproving that would be like disproving astrology. Who gets to decide 
if anything has been disproven, I don't wonder? What bunk!

Nordberg's claim (resp:22) at least *sounds* scientific. The 
dimensionality claim (mass) on his constant for gravitation sounds 
unusual. I would like to see his algebra. Unfortunately, the earthlink 
site is down at the moment, so I can't read any more details. A Grand 
unifying theory of physics, encompassing quantum behavior, relativity, 
and gravitation, is a holy grail of sorts for physicists. 

This reminds me of Monty Python when they claim to be seeking the grail, 
and the French guy in the castle says, they already have it.  :-)
russ
response 28 of 28: Mark Unseen   Nov 1 15:16 UTC 1997

This reminds me of a remark once made about some pseudo-scientific
rubbish:  "This isn't right.  It's not even *wrong*."
 0-24   24-28         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss