|
Grex > Mnet > #36: Agenda Item for June 13 Board Meeting | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 22 new of 45 responses total. |
jmsaul
|
|
response 24 of 45:
| 
Jun 11 21:24 UTC 2000 |
People may be discussing it here, but they're trying to get it back up
elsewhere. There have been some problems. I'd anticipate around another week
before it's back up and usable. I wish I could give you better news, but I
don't want to set expectations too high.
|
krj
|
|
response 25 of 45:
|
Jun 11 22:44 UTC 2000 |
Unfortunately there is an immense gap between "we want to go out of our way
to provide good service to our users" (seldon in resp:22) and
the two-to-three week outage anticipated in resp:24. (We're at Day 11
now, another week would make Day 18.) Does anyone *want* to provide
bad service? I doubt it.
In party, I'm hearing a steady stream of comments along the lines of
"I want my e-mail!" And the most alarming comment: "Is m-net gone
permanently?"
|
void
|
|
response 26 of 45:
|
Jun 12 00:58 UTC 2000 |
this is almost as bad as the three-week m-net outage in the summer
of 1995. we lived without m-net for three weeks then, and even though
it's not particularly pleasant, we can do it again.
|
slynne
|
|
response 27 of 45:
|
Jun 12 01:06 UTC 2000 |
Yeah, grex has gotten a lot faster since the last time I used it regularly.
I am not hurting having to conference here.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 28 of 45:
|
Jun 12 01:07 UTC 2000 |
M-Net is not gone permanently. For further info, inadequate and frustrating
though it may be, see Item 38.
|
jerryr
|
|
response 29 of 45:
|
Jun 12 02:20 UTC 2000 |
is all the griping in the world, all the nay-saying, all the hand-wringing
going to bring m-nut back online any sooner?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 30 of 45:
|
Jun 12 02:56 UTC 2000 |
Nay, I say. ;-)
|
tsty
|
|
response 31 of 45:
|
Jun 12 03:15 UTC 2000 |
at least the grim reaper could be stowed away for a couple of months.
|
polvo
|
|
response 32 of 45:
|
Jun 12 03:26 UTC 2000 |
You are drunk.
|
willard
|
|
response 33 of 45:
|
Jun 12 04:04 UTC 2000 |
#32: That's my conclusion, as well.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 34 of 45:
|
Jun 12 06:43 UTC 2000 |
Normally, I wouldn't accuse him of being drunk...but #31 just left me going
"Huh?"
|
lelande
|
|
response 35 of 45:
|
Jun 12 07:38 UTC 2000 |
we know, kevin.
we know.
|
buzzard
|
|
response 36 of 45:
|
Jun 12 11:11 UTC 2000 |
See?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 37 of 45:
|
Jun 12 13:15 UTC 2000 |
I'm guessing here, but I think he was trying to say that the downtime
shouldn't be counted for purposes of the one-month reap rule.
|
dpc
|
|
response 38 of 45:
|
Jun 12 14:41 UTC 2000 |
That's what I think, too.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 39 of 45:
|
Jun 12 15:48 UTC 2000 |
That is, hold off the grim reaper program to give users a chance
to rediscover that M-net is working again.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 40 of 45:
|
Jun 12 16:46 UTC 2000 |
Yep. And it's a good idea.
|
trex
|
|
response 41 of 45:
|
Jun 12 20:09 UTC 2000 |
thats a good idea. someone will have to remind me of that.. :)
|
tpryan
|
|
response 42 of 45:
|
Jun 12 22:14 UTC 2000 |
Rex, don't forget to hold off the grim reaper to give users a chance
to rediscover that M-net is working again.
sorry, I had prime real estate on that one ;)
|
styles
|
|
response 43 of 45:
|
Jun 12 23:49 UTC 2000 |
Could someone perhaps keep me posted about BoD discussions on improving the
web interface, being that I will most likely not be able to attend, given the
present circumstances (i.e. I live in Brooklyn)?
Thanky.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 44 of 45:
|
Jun 13 00:01 UTC 2000 |
You got it.
|
tsty
|
|
response 45 of 45:
|
Jun 13 09:11 UTC 2000 |
thankxx to the preceptinve for being able to recognize a good idea at
first glance.
|