|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 576 responses total. |
twinkie
|
|
response 230 of 576:
| 
Aug 27 12:08 UTC 2002 |
I think people are being overly defensive.
By definition (yes, "hottie" is in Webster's Dictionary), a "hottie" is
someone who is physically attractive. By generally-accepted definition, a
"hottie" is physically more attractive than the average person of similar age.
It is a consensus that people such as Britney Spears, Richard Gere, Rachael
Leigh Cook, Ricky Martin, Rene Russo, and Freddie Prinze Jr. are hotties.
While you and I may have differing opinions about people on that list, most
people believe them to be more attractive than normal. It is not entirely
unreasonable to use those people as a "hottie litmus".
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 231 of 576:
|
Aug 27 14:11 UTC 2002 |
It is still a relative term. There are some out there (obviously) that
don't find that people in your list at all attractive.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 232 of 576:
|
Aug 27 14:14 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
carson
|
|
response 233 of 576:
|
Aug 27 16:20 UTC 2002 |
(I agree with twinkie's 1st & 2nd paragraphs, and the 4th minus "those,"
although frankly it doesn't matter what I think. this item isn't about you.
it's not about me. it's not even about the #07 [#!%. it's all about
Greg. it's his item. Jamie made it for him because he NEEDS it!)
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 234 of 576:
|
Aug 27 16:23 UTC 2002 |
Now, for the slow ones among us, explain why exactly *does* Greg need
this item?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 235 of 576:
|
Aug 27 16:57 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 236 of 576:
|
Aug 27 17:35 UTC 2002 |
Like I said . . . this explanation is for the slow ones.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 237 of 576:
|
Aug 27 17:37 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 238 of 576:
|
Aug 27 17:39 UTC 2002 |
re: 231
Yes...I suppose it is a relative term.
If I were to douse you in water that was 100 degrees centigrade, I would think
it's pretty darn "hot"...but I suppose you would consider it "mildly warm"
and state that molten lava and the surface of the Sun are both much hotter.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 239 of 576:
|
Aug 27 17:54 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 240 of 576:
|
Aug 27 17:58 UTC 2002 |
Unless you're more depraved than I thought, pain and beauty are rarely
so closely linked.
|
phenix
|
|
response 241 of 576:
|
Aug 27 21:26 UTC 2002 |
yup it's pain and pleasure which are the same impusle just at differnt
intensities
|
arianna
|
|
response 242 of 576:
|
Aug 27 22:15 UTC 2002 |
mynxcat, you are SO CUTE!!! *g*
some people feel the need to be argumentative. <shrug> either way, the
Hot-or-Not items seems like it should be the place where we post our choices
for who is "hot" (by whatever definition). who wants to bother disgreeing
when it's all, as was said earlier, relative?
maybe we should go on a grexpedition to find all the hot grexers, carson --
how's that for a roadtrip idea (slightly belated)? (;
|
carson
|
|
response 243 of 576:
|
Aug 27 22:19 UTC 2002 |
(that's Greg's bag. it's his item. he NEEDS it.)
(speaking of phenix... there's been little on the Watch front; certainly
not enough for an update. I did hear a rumor that he's working on a
top-secret project codenamed "Cherry Seed," which is apparently a sequel
to "Appleseed" and "Blue Seed," but with more tits. I can't confirm it,
though.)
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 244 of 576:
|
Aug 27 22:38 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 245 of 576:
|
Aug 28 08:43 UTC 2002 |
resp:243 LOL
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 246 of 576:
|
Aug 28 12:58 UTC 2002 |
resp:242 - My point exactly.
Sapna, was you picture a cut-out from our lunch at TGI Fridays?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 247 of 576:
|
Aug 28 15:35 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 248 of 576:
|
Aug 28 15:37 UTC 2002 |
I thought so. It was the brick background and the bit of yellow shirt
left in the photo that clued me in.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 249 of 576:
|
Aug 28 15:57 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 250 of 576:
|
Aug 28 16:12 UTC 2002 |
<grins> Naturally!
|
lelande
|
|
response 251 of 576:
|
Aug 28 18:21 UTC 2002 |
who would want to waste one SECOND of life being objective about sex?
to whom that question is directed, you know who you are.
|
jazz
|
|
response 252 of 576:
|
Aug 28 20:18 UTC 2002 |
Uhm, I dunno, people who're paid for it?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 253 of 576:
|
Aug 28 20:41 UTC 2002 |
,snorts>
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 254 of 576:
|
Aug 29 00:02 UTC 2002 |
Kinda helps in our culture where people are sex-obsessed but yet afraid
to merely touch each other. I mean, it doesn't change the fact
outright, but it's a start.
|
