You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-23   23-47   48-71        
 
Author Message
25 new of 71 responses total.
jep
response 23 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 27 19:13 UTC 2005

How do you apply "shy y" if you use Backtalk?  Does it mark your posts 
as being unGoogleable retroactively?

Can we create a test conference which is Googleable, perhaps 
called "Google Agora" or something, and try opening that one first?
mcnally
response 24 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 27 19:32 UTC 2005

 Can I suggest someone whip up a quick man page for the undocumented
 "shy" command?
naftee
response 25 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 27 20:47 UTC 2005

re 21 The web page is an exact copy of a GreX item.  What's the difference?
glenda
response 26 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 27 23:07 UTC 2005

Yes, how does one use the shy command?  I tried it and got "Cannot open
/home/janc/src/backtalk/shylist."  Or does it only work in backtalk?  If that
is the case what do those of us that do not use backtalk and don't want
anonymous readers seeing our responses do?
i
response 27 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 28 02:35 UTC 2005

Do we need to add a level of shyness here, call it "very", that hides your
comments from both anonymous readers and robots, change shy "y" so it only
hides comments from robots, then make the "y" everyone's default (except 
change the current "y" crowd to "very") as the experiment begins?  

I think that many people says things in our conferences that they might 
not want to share (via Google) with someone like an employer... 
janc
response 28 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 28 13:07 UTC 2005

Sounds like shy is broken.  Permission issue probably.  I need to look
at that.

  "shy y" means that your responses won't be visible to anonymous
  readers, including bots.

  "shy n" returns you to normal.

Yes, it's retro-active.  If you are on the shy list, all your past and
future responses are hidden.

I'm not sure Walter's suggestion is practical.  It's hard to tell bots
from other anonymous readers.  I'd have to base it on the User Agent
string sent by the browser/bot and there are an awful lot of
browser/bots out there.
naftee
response 29 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 28 13:26 UTC 2005

I wish shy were pro-active :(
davel
response 30 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 28 15:42 UTC 2005

Re 28: permissions may be a problem, but the immediate problem seems to be
the specified path.  /home/janc doesn't seem to exist.
ric
response 31 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 31 19:57 UTC 2005

So, all the instances of polytwerp calling me a paedophile will be googlable?
great.  
tod
response 32 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 31 21:31 UTC 2005

Yea, "Rick Root" will show up with paedophile on google
naftee
response 33 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 00:46 UTC 2005

lolz
cmcgee
response 34 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 11:51 UTC 2005

I'm in favor of the idea. IIRC, minutes have always been searchable.  I'd 
like to see it start with an Agora restart, or with a conference that 
volunteers (by vote within the conference and an agreeable fw).  

I think it needs a member vote however, especially if we are experimenting 
with Agora.  


Ric's comments started some ideas in my mind.  It seems that we might have 
some users who are willing to be members of a conf that has a somewhat 
more active fw than is traditional, leaning toward a "moderator" level of 
involvement.  

Could we have an experimental conference lead the way?  One that was 
clearly intended to be a public Web conversation pit, and inteneded as a 
marketing tool for Grex?


ric
response 35 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 12:19 UTC 2005

btw, if you're going to publish conferences, you should place google ads on
the pages - at least for people who are not logged in.  Could be a nice source
of revenue if the item threads are indexed well by google.
slynne
response 36 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 16:22 UTC 2005

I agree that this is a big enough change that putting it to a member
vote is a good idea. 

I also *really* like the idea of putting google ads on the pages
although I dont know if anyone else would agree
keesan
response 37 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 18:06 UTC 2005

I would consider google ads or any ads in the same category as school vending
machines and I would be willing to pay higher dues to avoid it even though
it does not affect me personally since I don't access grex by web.
tod
response 38 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 20:00 UTC 2005

Google ads are dangerous and could link people to spyware sites
albaugh
response 39 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 21:14 UTC 2005

I suppose people who wished to hide their identity even beyond what is already
in place could just create pseudos for themselves, using newuser.  Oh wait...
tod
response 40 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 04:01 UTC 2005

Grex could always start requiring a National ID.
other
response 41 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 19:23 UTC 2005

Do Google ads pay only for click-throughs, or based on impressions (times served)?
slynne
response 42 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 4 21:09 UTC 2005

I think they pay for click-throughs but I am not sure. I think polygon
uses them on his site.
ric
response 43 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 02:38 UTC 2005

Google pays per click.  I have google ads on my blog and some other pages,
I've made about $210 in the last month or so.

Polygon uses them too.
dpc
response 44 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 16:05 UTC 2005

I think ads are things for which the Grex world is not prepared.
ric
response 45 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 12:43 UTC 2005

Don't speak rashly.  

If it's possible to only place the ads on pages displayed to users who are
not logged in, then Grex can benefit from google indexing of items, without
affecting any current user of grex.

Google text ads are unobtrusive, and surprisingly effective - much more so
than banner ads, because the google text ads are usually relevant to the page
they're being displayed on.

Without displaying them to users who are logged in, they would only be
effective if grex items showed up in Google or other search engines.  If the
conferences were well indexed, I could see that revenue leading to anywhere
from $3 - $20/month, again, without impacking users who are already logged
in.  Who knows, maybe more.

Certain items could lead to higher ad rates.  Enter an item and have a
discussion about Misothelioma, and you'll probably get $5 or so for every ad
that's clicked on!

Heck, turn on the ads for grex users, and encourage grexers to click on the
ads.  Grex users know that clicking on the ads would support Grex.  I'd do
it.
tod
response 46 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 12:48 UTC 2005

Google ads would be effective on Grexers?
Are you thinking of selling Dr.Demento boxsets and Dr.Who mugs?
keesan
response 47 of 71: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 14:31 UTC 2005

I would much rather pay more per month instead of going commercial.
 0-23   23-47   48-71        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss