You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 204-228   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-353   354-378   379-403   404-428 
 429-453   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
 
Author Message
25 new of 610 responses total.
i
response 229 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 22:38 UTC 1998

2.5g of fat in an 8 oz. serving would be a *mighty* poor brand of butter.
The fat in this food is of dairy origin, though, and butter is, in another
sense, not too far off the mark.   <-- big, fat hint
keesan
response 230 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 01:15 UTC 1998

Not buttermilk again?
i
response 231 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 16:01 UTC 1998

Oh, no, never!  This is lowfat buttermilk.

How do we get more people to play this game?
keesan
response 232 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 17:50 UTC 1998

Could we appoint someone chosen at random from another item?
Calling for volunteers!!!!!!
keesan
response 233 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 14:33 UTC 1998

Three ingredients to this one, one oddly spelled, one unbelievable, which you
can guess after guessing the main ingredient:
serving size 1 pack (200 g)
protein 3 g
fat 62 mg
No calories from fat, no cholesterol
sugars 79 g
carbohydrate 117 g
saturated fat 27 mg
fiber 8 g
calories 450
VA 0mg
Vc 2 mg
Na 112 mg
Ca 28 mg
Fe 1 mg

net weight 200g


I expect that the figure for VA is way too low, so perhaps the other numbers
are also not too trustable.
valerie
response 234 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 03:17 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

orinoco
response 235 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 14:44 UTC 1998

I seem to remember having seen nutrition info on gum - or at least info on
the number of calories and such. 
keesan
response 236 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 15:35 UTC 1998

VA - vitamin A (but the 0 figure is definitely wrong)
Vc - vitamin C
62 mg fat = .062 g fat.  200 g total weight.  As someone pointed out a while
back when I brought up 62 mg fat - 0 fat calories.
In this household, if you open a package of anything it becomes a serving (i.
e., it is gone within a few hours if not sooner).
Think no cholesterol (not animal), some vitamins, some fiber, little fat or
protein, one major ingredient, and two (or it could be three) additives which
contribute mainly only calories.
        Think - whoever typed this up was not a native speaker of English. 
It is not something that you would find, in this form, in a supermarket, but
the ingredients in it are common (except possibly for one that is probably
an odd misspelling).
i
response 237 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 03:10 UTC 1998

Kroger is where i get my lowfat buttermilk.  I bought a half gallon, and
will have to get busy baking chocolate cakes to use it up.  Summer-resistant
frosting may be an interesting experiment - any ideas?
keesan
response 238 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 18:04 UTC 1998

Butterfat used to be lowfat by definition - it was what was left after you
removed the fat from milk to make butter.  Frosting is based on fat, how can
you make it from lowfat milk?
        On 'what am i' - this is a fruit or vegetable with a minor amount of
additive, fiber and vitamins come with the primary ingredient.  It is rather
a common food but prepared in a way not common here.
keesan
response 239 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 17:13 UTC 1998

It is normally somewhat sweet, and originated in South American (I think)
but is now widely grown in warm climates around the world.
i
response 240 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 17:46 UTC 1998

Clues to date suggest sweet spuds or squash, mostly dried out, then 
super-charged with sugar.
keesan
response 241 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:07 UTC 1998

Ingredients:  High Quality Sweet postato, w-
hite Granulated Suger, Malt Dust honeypee.
No, those are not typos on my part.  
Walter, who else can we find to play this game?.
i
response 242 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 22:37 UTC 1998

Dunno.  Should we give away large cash prizes (and forbid ourselves
from winning), or conduct focus group marketing research?  

Anyone reading this who used to play "What Am I?" more often?  Why don't
you play so much any more?  Please do tell!
keesan
response 243 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 23:21 UTC 1998

John Morris says he is preparing to enter a nutrition label, but has not
been able to guess any of the previous entries.  Shall we wait for him?
honeypee - bee honey?  I think maybe people have eaten too much yogurt and
can't think of anything else to enter any more.
scott
response 244 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 00:43 UTC 1998

I used to play, but it sort of got to be too much work.  :/
keesan
response 245 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 03:17 UTC 1998

Would you like to be 'it' instead?
scott
response 246 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 12:02 UTC 1998

That is what was too much work.
valerie
response 247 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jul 11 13:02 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 248 of 610: Mark Unseen   Jul 12 02:11 UTC 1998

Want to post something?
i
response 249 of 610: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 03:10 UTC 1998

It looks like a well-made chocolate bribe would get valerie to post.  But
we need a "critical mass" of people to start and keep playing.  Hmmm.....
coyote
response 250 of 610: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 04:02 UTC 1998

(I'd play, but the entry's are always too hard to think about)
lilmo
response 251 of 610: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 20:31 UTC 1998

I try to play, but everything is always so obscure, I have no idea (plus I
was out of town all summer).
valerie
response 252 of 610: Mark Unseen   Aug 24 11:40 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

lilmo
response 253 of 610: Mark Unseen   Aug 24 23:08 UTC 1998

But I only just started during the "most recent entries", so all I've seen
are obscure items.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 204-228   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-353   354-378   379-403   404-428 
 429-453   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss