You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 203-227   228-252   253-277   278       
 
Author Message
25 new of 278 responses total.
gull
response 228 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 15:13 UTC 2004

Agreed that his voice works well for some songs and not others.  I'm
sure there's disagreement about which ones, too.  For example, I like
his version of "Downtown Train" a lot better than Rod Stewart's, but I'm
sure there are many people who feel otherwise.
mcnally
response 229 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:42 UTC 2004

  Now there's another depressing thought, though you're undoubtedly right.
  I have a visceral dislike of Rod Stewart which no doubt colors my 
  opinion on this issue..
gregb
response 230 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 17:28 UTC 2004

Re. 225:  I didn't "dislike" it.  I was just dissapointed that it didn't
match the spirit of the first two.  I'm glad that ther'll be another
film and I'll certainly be there opening weekend to see it.
glenda
response 231 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 20:05 UTC 2004

Film 4 is due out in 2005, film 5 is scheduled to be out in 2007.  That will
take it out to the current book.
pgreen
response 232 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 20:06 UTC 2004

Hi, Glenda!
gregb
response 233 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 17:01 UTC 2004

Re. 231:  Any idea why not 2006?
anderyn
response 234 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 18:31 UTC 2004

Probably due to special effects?
gregb
response 235 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 18:55 UTC 2004

Doubtful, considering how many FX were in the last two films.
mcnally
response 236 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 19:10 UTC 2004

  My guess would be to avoid a 3-year gap between film 5 and film 6
  (assuming there ever is a film 6.)  The spacing between the books
  has been growing greater and greater and the films take at least
  a year of work to produce *after* the book has been finished.
  Keeping the series relatively evenly spaced-out is probably somewhat
  important to the producers.

glenda
response 237 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 21:34 UTC 2004

Some of the extra time is so that the kids can actually spend some time at
real schools.  I just read an article about the actor that plays Malfoy.  He
said that he is putting college off for a year to finish filming #4.  There
was a gap between 3 & 4 so that one of them could catch up on school work.
It has to be hard working around school and labor issues with kids of this
age on projects this big.
tod
response 238 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 11 17:28 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tpryan
response 239 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 13 04:38 UTC 2004

        Saw Shrek2.  Okay, Love Potion No. IX.  I got it.
Also saw Harry Potter.  I wanna ride on the Magic Bus.
Saw "Saved" earlier tonight.  A bit of commentary on "Christian Life".
remmers
response 240 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 13 14:40 UTC 2004

I would like to report that "The Day After Tomorrow" is the best
movie I ever saw in Sedalia, Missouri.
gull
response 241 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 13 16:01 UTC 2004

I'm guessing it's also the ONLY movie you've ever seen in Sedalia, 
Missouri?
richard
response 242 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 04:33 UTC 2004

Saw "Harry Potter and Prisoner of Azkiban"-- my feeling is that the movie is
too rushed, and certain details are sacrificed as a result.  I know the studio
didn't want a three hour+ movie, but the books are so detailed that you can't
do them justice without enough time.  It was still a good movie but I wanted
it to be more than it was.

I shudder to think that they might try to bring "Goblet of Fire" in at 2 hrs.
and 25 mins or less
mcnally
response 243 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 05:43 UTC 2004

  I also saw "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban" this weekend
  and agree with Richard's criticism.  Even at 2 1/2 hours it was rushed
  to the point where substantial story cuts had to be made, eliminating
  crucial exposition and obfuscating character motivations.  

  Discussing the movie afterwards with Cathy it was clear to both of us
  that the problem is only going to get worse as the series progresses.
  If you look at the books next to each other on the shelf each book is
  noticably thicker than the volume that precedes it and the last couple
  of books have taken a huge leap over the first three.  This can't help
  but be a problem for filmmakers trying to continue the series.

  I thought that the new look for the series was interesting.  A much,
  much larger portion of this movie takes place outside Hogwarts' castle,
  much of it in the outdoors.  The protagonists wear "muggle" clothes
  throughout all but a small part of the movie.  The lesser characters
  have largely slipped away into the margins; they get very little screen
  time and do almost nothing to further the story.  And of course the new
  Dumbledore sucks, but what are you going to do when your original actor
  dies?
albaugh
response 244 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 15:01 UTC 2004

Took the boys to see Garfield.  Not great.  Good clean family fun, I guess.
This screen version of eats, but he doesn't, can't, ... well, you'll just have
to see the film to understand what I'm hinting at.  :-)
twenex
response 245 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 15:15 UTC 2004

Didn't even know there was a Garfield film. Thanks for the warning.
tpryan
response 246 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 16:24 UTC 2004

        They should have gotten Gandalf to stand in for Dumbledore.
remmers
response 247 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 17:19 UTC 2004

Re #241:  No, I've actually seen two movies in Sedalia, Missouri.
"Day After Tomorrow" recently, and "Forces of Nature" a few years
ago.  Didn't think either was particularly good, but "Day After
Tomorrow" was marginally better.
tod
response 248 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 17:24 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 249 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 18:09 UTC 2004

They've got to be concerned in Redondo Beach - they are onlly 59 feet above
MSL.
tod
response 250 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 18:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 251 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 19:44 UTC 2004

Mike in resp:242 :: in press stories around the time of the first
Harry Potter movie, director/series producer Chris Columbus was saying 
that the fourth book would have to be split into two films.  
But I have not heard anything to indicate that this realization 
is affecting the current filming of Potter #4.
twenex
response 252 of 278: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 19:46 UTC 2004

Are the King and Queen of Spain financing the next one?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 203-227   228-252   253-277   278       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss