|
Grex > Helpers > #140: Grex System Problems - Spring 2005 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 457 responses total. |
russ
|
|
response 22 of 457:
| 
Mar 27 13:56 UTC 2005 |
It appears to be time - if not past time - to block the IP addresses
used by a certain set of twits.
|
other
|
|
response 23 of 457:
|
Mar 27 16:01 UTC 2005 |
Vanilla interface of Backtalk does not seem to respect user filter
options.
|
naftee
|
|
response 24 of 457:
|
Mar 27 16:10 UTC 2005 |
someone should fix the vanilla interface on GreX :(
|
gelinas
|
|
response 25 of 457:
|
Mar 27 17:27 UTC 2005 |
russ, been there, done that, got the t-shirt, don't need to do it again.
|
naftee
|
|
response 26 of 457:
|
Mar 27 19:09 UTC 2005 |
re 24 Whoa, I meant "m-net"
|
scholar
|
|
response 27 of 457:
|
Mar 29 00:09 UTC 2005 |
I scribbled a few responses in coop. Each time I scribbled a response, BBS
segfaulted.
Could this possibly be a result of i's recent idiocy?
|
naftee
|
|
response 28 of 457:
|
Mar 29 01:34 UTC 2005 |
backtalk seems to scribble fine.
|
i
|
|
response 29 of 457:
|
Mar 29 02:33 UTC 2005 |
Hmmm...Picospan also dies with "Memory fault" for me; it doesn't seem to
matter if i'm a fw or not. (The scribble does take place. When i go
back to look at it, Picospan looks like it's having to fix up the sum
file, though.)
I wonder if this is an issue with our BSD port of PicoSpan. Any other
circumstances where you've noticed Picospan bombing?
|
scholar
|
|
response 30 of 457:
|
Mar 29 02:45 UTC 2005 |
I noticed errors after you unilaterally deleted benign user comments in coop.
|
bru
|
|
response 31 of 457:
|
Mar 29 06:45 UTC 2005 |
I tried to telnet in earlier andd all th ports were in use. That has not
happened in a while.
|
cross
|
|
response 32 of 457:
|
Mar 30 03:37 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
glenda
|
|
response 33 of 457:
|
Mar 30 05:08 UTC 2005 |
Why, I like and prefer picospan.
|
naftee
|
|
response 34 of 457:
|
Mar 30 05:22 UTC 2005 |
Me too.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 35 of 457:
|
Mar 30 05:44 UTC 2005 |
Ditto
|
tod
|
|
response 36 of 457:
|
Mar 30 16:24 UTC 2005 |
DITTO
|
cross
|
|
response 37 of 457:
|
Mar 30 16:24 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 38 of 457:
|
Mar 30 16:31 UTC 2005 |
The difference is that I abhor GUI usage the way Unabomber abhors the
industrial revolution. To me, replacing picospan with a browser friendly
version would be like NPR producing some kind of Fear Factor reality segment.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 39 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:02 UTC 2005 |
I pefer picospan because it is a simple text interface. I prefer text e-mail
also, also for simplicity and speed. Here is my .sig file:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NB. To prevent HTML code from being sent with e-mail, see instructions
at http://www.duke.edu/~cwcook/nomime.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to apply this to conferencing too.
|
tod
|
|
response 40 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:04 UTC 2005 |
That's a great .sig, Rane. I often have to wait a day or so before I'll
bother reading any non-text email.
|
cross
|
|
response 41 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:07 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 42 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:10 UTC 2005 |
So, what advantages does fronttalk have over picospan?
|
tod
|
|
response 43 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:13 UTC 2005 |
The disadvantage: "the program is actually a specialized web-browser that
makes HTTP requests to a Backtalk system to read and post to the conferences.
This means that it can be run on any Unix system to access any Backtalk system
on the web that supports it."
The advantage: "it is the only open-source Picospan clone"
http://www.unixpapa.com/backtalk/
|
cross
|
|
response 44 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:18 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 45 of 457:
|
Mar 30 17:33 UTC 2005 |
re #44
Why not alias bbs to ft then so folks stop using picospan?
|
albaugh
|
|
response 46 of 457:
|
Mar 30 18:47 UTC 2005 |
That has been discussed several times. Recently I got the impression that
such an alias switch was "imminent"...
|