You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-21   21-45   46-48        
 
Author Message
25 new of 48 responses total.
brighn
response 21 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 04:49 UTC 1998

#19> Point?
jazz
response 22 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 15:11 UTC 1998

        Didn't Christ preach tolerance for all? :)|
bjorn
response 23 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 18:59 UTC 1998

Unfortunately, the Bible not only contradicts itself from Old to New
testament, but also withing the same chapter.  Gensis, for example.
jazz
response 24 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 13:31 UTC 1998

        So it's acceptable to use inflammatory statements about Christianity,
but not others about your beliefs?  I see.
brighn
response 25 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 13:35 UTC 1998

That's not a flame. That's the truth, stated simply and not in a hostile
or condescending manner. 
bjorn
response 26 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 13:51 UTC 1998

Thank you, brighn.  (failing to resist the urge to use a gaming reference):
Jazz, you critically failed your interpretation/perception check.
jazz
response 27 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 17:48 UTC 1998

        There's a difference between "flaming" and "inflammatory", Paul -
I'm sure you're aware of it.

        #26:  That's so twittish that there's just no reply.

        See, that was flaming. :)
brighn
response 28 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 02:06 UTC 1998

You're right, John, there is. 
the comments that you made some time ago, that bjorn critized, were flames
and flame-baits.
the comment bjorn made was inflammatory.
happy?
mta
response 29 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 17:10 UTC 1998

re: resp:21 (which was re resp:19)

My point is that the suggestion was made that I submist my essay to Reader's
Digest ... and it's so thoroughly pagan in outlook that I can't see how I
could rewrite it keeping the point and still making it palatable to RD's
self-selected audience.
birdnoir
response 30 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 03:17 UTC 1998

        The Xtian bible was much better befor the Esclesiastical (spl?) Council
of 485 AD, this papal group re-wrote major parts of the original, writting
out such thing that they believed werr common knowledge, givens like
re-incarnation and the many god and goddess involved with Yahweh.
bjorn
response 31 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 12:58 UTC 1998

Your spelling looks right, birdnoir.
brighn
response 32 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 13:56 UTC 1998

29> I knew what your point was. I'd already said the article has nearly no
chance of being accepted by RD, but it's a strange strange world.
jazz
response 33 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 15:34 UTC 1998

        Ecclesiastical.  I think you're referring to the Deuteronical
revisions, which occured almost eight hundred years earlier, and consolidated
two different sets of polytheistic (but worshipping one diety, and with
notable theological differences) legends, those of the Baalist and the
Yahwist.  The Yahwists were the monotheistic-seeming ones, but both the
Baalists and the Yahwists worshipped the same diety, often known by a host
of different names.  The Yahwist disgust for the Baalist polytheism is evident
throughout the OT.

        Now the Council of Constantine was responsible for the removal of a
lot of apocrypha and for any hint of Gnostic bent in the NT.  Many Gnostics
did believe in reincarnation, and later incarnations of Gnosticism worshipped
the Goddess Sophia, or, Wisdom, if somewhat obliquely.  But that wasn't really
a part of the popular religion.
bjorn
response 34 of 48: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 16:43 UTC 1998

All very interesting points, but perhaps it is time that this particular
discussion move to its own item?
font
response 35 of 48: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 02:42 UTC 1998

Misti:
Your article is very beautiful.  It has brought new understanding to me.
<font wipes tears from her eyes> 
I wish I'd had more of a bridge to my father before he died...  The bridge
had fallen when I wasn't looking.  I'm still fighting with how to honor
him without making myself uncomfortable.
Have you considered sending this article to "The Sun"  ?
mta
response 36 of 48: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 13:36 UTC 1998

What's _The Sun_?
brighn
response 37 of 48: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 19:38 UTC 1998

It's a large yellow-white ball of fire that provides light for our planet,
Misti.
robh
response 38 of 48: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 19:45 UTC 1998

It's also an alternative religious mag.  Check the Utne Reader
for contact info, they usually have an ad and/or article in it.
mta
response 39 of 48: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 18:08 UTC 1998

OK, thanks Rob.
aldous
response 40 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 18:16 UTC 1999

Well, to update anyone who wants to know, this article was published in JULES-
The Journal of Unusual Learning and Esoteric Studies, Vol 4, No 2.  It was
an excellent piece, and quite a welcome submission.
kami
response 41 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 18:34 UTC 1999

Hey!  Life in this item, what do you know...

Anyone else have thoughts about life, death or relationships?
jazz
response 42 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 19:48 UTC 1999

        Good to see you're back, Kami.  If anyone can resuscitate this
conference, it'd be you!
aldous
response 43 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 11:24 UTC 1999

Given the conference topic, perhaps "reincarnate" would be a better term?
kami
response 44 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 05:27 UTC 1999

No, Jazz- I'm not that fond of my own words.  One person does not a
conversation make.  Generally...<g>
Cute, Aldous.
So- say something...
jazz
response 45 of 48: Mark Unseen   Jun 23 14:59 UTC 1999

        Don't dash my hopes, Kami. :)

        Allright ... I had an unsual experience recently wherein I was outside,
reading, for about an hour or so, and during that period of time, a
blue-and-gray dragonfly kept lighting upon me, and upon the book I was
reading.  It was bizaare.  I'd never had a dragonfly get that close, or stay
that close for that long.  Possibilities?
 0-21   21-45   46-48        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss