|
Grex > Oldcoop > #111: A Proposal to Clarify Grex's Stance on Deleting Items | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 235 responses total. |
rational
|
|
response 209 of 235:
| 
Mar 12 00:56 UTC 2004 |
Re. 196: We CAN know that MOST people who voted DIDN"T read the coop
conference, let alone paricipate in it, because of the logs.
|
salad
|
|
response 210 of 235:
|
Mar 12 03:08 UTC 2004 |
And janc's nifty item.
|
remmers
|
|
response 211 of 235:
|
Mar 14 18:30 UTC 2004 |
The vote on this has ended. I've emailed the treasurer. Once Mark
has certified the voter list, I'll post the results.
|
aruba
|
|
response 212 of 235:
|
Mar 14 19:38 UTC 2004 |
I'll need to check the box tomorrow, so I'll mail John after I do.
|
remmers
|
|
response 213 of 235:
|
Mar 15 17:38 UTC 2004 |
Mark emailed me the updated voter list, so here are the results.
Number of members voting: 40 out of 77 eligible
Yes 21
No 19
The motion passes.
|
atlantic
|
|
response 214 of 235:
|
Mar 15 17:41 UTC 2004 |
Yet no-one has any fucking idea what it does.
|
tod
|
|
response 215 of 235:
|
Mar 15 17:52 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 216 of 235:
|
Mar 15 18:08 UTC 2004 |
Exact wording is in response #154.
|
tod
|
|
response 217 of 235:
|
Mar 15 18:20 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 218 of 235:
|
Mar 15 18:32 UTC 2004 |
No, I don't think it can be twisted to include parody items. It's not
intended to be so twisted, any way.
|
tod
|
|
response 219 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
salad
|
|
response 220 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:20 UTC 2004 |
uh
?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 221 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:27 UTC 2004 |
Past experience has been that such duplicate items are caught before
people reply substantively to them. The responses I've seen have been
"This is a duplicate" and "Kill it, please," responses that shouldn't
cause a problem when removed with the offending item. Others would have
to be judged on a case-by-case basis by those involved.
|
tod
|
|
response 222 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:29 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
salad
|
|
response 223 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:39 UTC 2004 |
YEs, because they're about a DEAD MUSICIAN. Get it? HAhahaahaha
|
gelinas
|
|
response 224 of 235:
|
Mar 15 19:58 UTC 2004 |
Not after people have responded to them.
|
salad
|
|
response 225 of 235:
|
Mar 15 20:30 UTC 2004 |
It was a joke.
|
keesan
|
|
response 226 of 235:
|
Mar 15 23:58 UTC 2004 |
Why don't you just post once and ask someone to link?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 227 of 235:
|
Mar 16 00:05 UTC 2004 |
(Because that wouldn't test the wording of the just-approved policy.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 228 of 235:
|
Mar 16 00:12 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
atlantic
|
|
response 229 of 235:
|
Mar 16 00:19 UTC 2004 |
This item violates Grex's general principles. It must be deleted now.
|
other
|
|
response 230 of 235:
|
Mar 16 00:20 UTC 2004 |
#229: /s/item/response
|
atlantic
|
|
response 231 of 235:
|
Mar 16 00:25 UTC 2004 |
Keep in mind, other, that even if only response contains the actual
violating material, the policy Grex just adopted means the whole item
has to go.
|
salad
|
|
response 232 of 235:
|
Mar 16 01:27 UTC 2004 |
Then why hasn't item 7 in the agora40 conference been deleted yet, even though
I've asked for it to be gone PRECISELY because it contains information that
JEP wished to be gone ?
|
soup
|
|
response 233 of 235:
|
Mar 29 02:01 UTC 2004 |
UYEAH' ANSWER THIS JERKS"
|