|
Grex > Cinema > #44: Movie Reviews for the Summer of 2001 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 284 responses total. |
mooncat
|
|
response 200 of 284:
|
Aug 6 21:55 UTC 2001 |
Yupyup. ut that was after (?) Black Mask and an American release, so I
wasn't counting it. (Own it though...)
|
edina
|
|
response 201 of 284:
|
Aug 7 14:11 UTC 2001 |
Ok - we saw "Billy Elliot" last night, for lack of anything else to watch -
it was a great movie - but I felt like I needed a bottle of prozac after it.
|
richard
|
|
response 202 of 284:
|
Aug 7 15:57 UTC 2001 |
PLANET OF THE APES-- What was the point of it? It didnt expand or
re-think the original. Mark Wahlberg was a weak lead. The ending was
really corny.
(note: I saw this while in Bangkok-- the theaters over there have E-Z boy
recliners instead of regular seats, that lean all the way back. And they
encourage you/expect you to take off your shoes. It was a bit like
watching a movie in one's livingroom. And they served booze at the
concession stand. You havent had the cineplex movie-going experience
until you watch a movie in a theater in a lazy boy recliner in your bare
feet sipping a Singapore Sling! Of course it is easy to fall asleep!)
|
anderyn
|
|
response 203 of 284:
|
Aug 7 18:44 UTC 2001 |
I would think so, Richard! :-)
Haven't seen any movies lately. Ah well.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 204 of 284:
|
Aug 7 19:02 UTC 2001 |
There were a few theaters in Chicago with liquor licences. I don't think any
of them had recliners, though.
|
brighn
|
|
response 205 of 284:
|
Aug 7 20:14 UTC 2001 |
You know, if I'd gone all the way to Bangkok to see Planet of the Apes, I
imagine I'd be disappointed, too. Ween't they showing it more locally,
richard?
|
tpryan
|
|
response 206 of 284:
|
Aug 7 21:28 UTC 2001 |
Quo Vadid in Westland has/had a liquor licence.
|
ric
|
|
response 207 of 284:
|
Aug 8 19:08 UTC 2001 |
Watched Disney's "The Kid" on DVD last night... I found it fairly enjoyable,
albiet corny (all non-animated Disney flicks tend to be corny)
|
beeswing
|
|
response 208 of 284:
|
Aug 8 21:27 UTC 2001 |
Does anyone remember those educational Disney films? I remember
watching some Disney film in 6th grade about female adolescent
development. It was of no help at all, and the sound was so bad it was
like a McDonald's drive through speaker. Very corny too.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 209 of 284:
|
Aug 9 01:36 UTC 2001 |
I remember the ones with Jiminy Cricket....
|
krj
|
|
response 210 of 284:
|
Aug 9 03:41 UTC 2001 |
We saw SONGCATCHER tonight at the Michigan. The folks who are interested
in old songs or folk songs should probably see it; it's holding at
the Michigan for most of the next week. What else has Janet McTeer
done?
|
eeyore
|
|
response 211 of 284:
|
Aug 9 04:06 UTC 2001 |
What is it about?
|
brighn
|
|
response 212 of 284:
|
Aug 9 14:09 UTC 2001 |
#209> Donald Duck in Mathemagic Land is a classic, though... I should try
finding that on tape/dvd.
|
beeswing
|
|
response 213 of 284:
|
Aug 9 14:13 UTC 2001 |
oh yeah, i remember that one.
|
krj
|
|
response 214 of 284:
|
Aug 9 15:06 UTC 2001 |
resp:211 :: SONGCATCHER is set in the earliest 20th century. Janet McTeer
quits her musicology teaching job after she's passed over for a
promotion. She goes to stay with her sister, who is a teacher in a
one-room schoolhouse in Appalachia, and she discovers that the local
people have a song tradition which has preserved a sizable number
of old British Isles ballads. Janet McTeer's character sets out to
collect and publish the songs; she encounters a mixed reaction from
the community, and she also gets pulled into a number of local
dramas involving love and business.
|
edina
|
|
response 215 of 284:
|
Aug 9 22:14 UTC 2001 |
Ken - Janet McTeer was nominated for a Best Actress Oscar for "Tumbleweeds".
|
rcurl
|
|
response 216 of 284:
|
Aug 10 15:28 UTC 2001 |
_Shrek_ was mostly reviewed in Spring 2001 agora, but I finally saw it
last night (I had been searching for Castaway, but it isn't being screened
locally). _Shrek_ is a computer animation tour-de-fore, but one gets used
to that pretty quickly. The story itself is totally conventional although
with some contemporary humor. What did disturb me, however, is the
stereotyping of beauty and ugliness, which confirms in young viewers minds
that anorexic hotties are "beautiful", and dumpy broads are "ugly". Of
course, it was nice that the dumpy broad could find true love...but don't
forget that even the ogre fell in love with the anorexic hottie.
So, to amuse myself further, as well as to consider the implications of
the stereotyping, I reviewed the movie in my mind but with the interchange
of the anorexic hottie and dumpy broad. Would this have been convincing?
It would mean that the height-challenged king would have had to select the
dumpy broad over the two other anorexic hotties. Of course, the ogre
would have more quickly appreciated the fine points of the dumpy broad -
clearly a member of his own genotype. He would probably have kissed her
sooner (with the fortunate consequence of shortening the movie), but could
he have then found happiness with a permanently anorexic hottie? I don't
think the audience would have approved.
|
brighn
|
|
response 217 of 284:
|
Aug 10 16:38 UTC 2001 |
I've wondered if this is the etymology of the title in the first place, but
I can't seem to bring myself to go see Shrek on that basis of the German
"Schrechlich" (spelling), which means "terrible." I suppose the point might
be that the Ogre is a Horror, but I dunno, it just feel like the movie
reviewing itself in the title, and I can't get that out of my mind.
|
krj
|
|
response 218 of 284:
|
Aug 10 17:43 UTC 2001 |
Leslie and I caught what was probably the last local screening of
"Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" last night. In general it was a disappointment,
because the raw material was there for a movie at least as entertaining
as a middling quality James Bond movie. Angelina Jolie makes a
pretty good action hero, and a lot of the visuals are pretty good.
They did a halfway decent job with the moral ambiguity of Lara's
opportunistic boyfriend Alex West, and we liked Lara's assistants,
the geeky technical expert and the butler.
But the movie needed better writing, and too much of it betrayed
its videogame origins. There was far too much of "Insert Tab A into
Slot B" ("The clock goes here! No, it goes here!!") and too many
of the action scenes, instead of being exciting, went on at great
repetitive length.
Another writing failure: the movie makes a point of delivering
the geeky tech guy to Venice, and then to the final confrontation
in Iceland -- or Siberia, it's never really explained which --
but he has nothing to do at the end of the movie -- nothing
really to do at all after the Illuminati stage the raid on
Lara's mansion.
Top action scene was probably the attack of the Cambodian
stone temple guards, who of course come to life when the
treasure they're guarding is stolen.
I'd love to see a sequel with these characters, written by real
screenwriters, with little to no input from the videogame people.
I should warn people that my reaction is more positive than
Leslie's; she was really bored in the first half of the movie and
thought about walking out.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 219 of 284:
|
Aug 10 18:31 UTC 2001 |
Re #217: Schrech itself, in German, means terror, fright, horror, etc.
|
lynne
|
|
response 220 of 284:
|
Aug 10 21:20 UTC 2001 |
re #217 and 219: And you're both spelling it wrong. "Schrecklich" or
"Schreck" are the correct spellings, respectively.
I too am less than enthused about seeing the movie because of the German
associations of the title (intentional or not).
|
tpryan
|
|
response 221 of 284:
|
Aug 10 21:32 UTC 2001 |
Any film that ryhmes with "Drek" should be suspect.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 222 of 284:
|
Aug 10 23:11 UTC 2001 |
Re #229: thanks for correction - I even looked it up myself last night,
but someone threw me off today by mispelling it.... 8^}
|
eeyore
|
|
response 223 of 284:
|
Aug 11 01:43 UTC 2001 |
Actually, it's called Shrek for exactly that reason. :)
I did like the fact that when she turned at the end, and was bitching that
she wasn't beautiful, he told her that she was. :)
|
danr
|
|
response 224 of 284:
|
Aug 11 03:23 UTC 2001 |
Silvia and I went to see Planet of the Apes this evening. I was a bit
hesitant because Mary Remmers so roundly panned it, but it was actually
pretty good. The deus ex machina (chimp ex machina) was a bit hokey,
but I liked the ending.
|