|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 1013 responses total. |
kip
|
|
response 200 of 1013:
|
May 26 13:33 UTC 2003 |
superb
Sorry about Viking, forgot about the proper noun rule.
|
kentn
|
|
response 201 of 1013:
|
May 26 18:47 UTC 2003 |
bewail 0 (The Previous Word)
----------
moaned 0 (albaugh)
talcum 0 (kip)
teepee 0 (aruba)
----------
rivets 1 (prp)
enamor 0 (aruba)
----------
bemoan 0 (kingjon)
divert 2 (aruba)
----------
dipped 0 (gelinas)
donors 0 (aruba)
superb 2 (kip)
----------
|
gelinas
|
|
response 202 of 1013:
|
May 27 01:39 UTC 2003 |
simple
|
kip
|
|
response 203 of 1013:
|
May 27 03:14 UTC 2003 |
purest
|
prp
|
|
response 204 of 1013:
|
May 27 19:45 UTC 2003 |
sweets
|
kentn
|
|
response 205 of 1013:
|
May 27 23:27 UTC 2003 |
bewail 0 (The Previous Word)
----------
moaned 0 (albaugh)
talcum 0 (kip)
teepee 0 (aruba)
----------
rivets 1 (prp)
enamor 0 (aruba)
----------
bemoan 0 (kingjon)
divert 2 (aruba)
----------
dipped 0 (gelinas)
donors 0 (aruba)
superb 2 (kip)
----------
simple 0 (gelinas)
purest 3 (kip)
sweets 1 (prp)
----------
|
kip
|
|
response 206 of 1013:
|
May 27 23:47 UTC 2003 |
lucent
|
aruba
|
|
response 207 of 1013:
|
May 28 01:32 UTC 2003 |
lucent is the only word in onelook that fits.
|
prp
|
|
response 208 of 1013:
|
May 28 18:59 UTC 2003 |
While I believe lucent in the only one, I don't see that there is
any convient way to prove it.
|
kingjon
|
|
response 209 of 1013:
|
May 28 19:16 UTC 2003 |
pureed
|
prp
|
|
response 210 of 1013:
|
May 28 19:32 UTC 2003 |
bevies
|
kentn
|
|
response 211 of 1013:
|
May 28 23:22 UTC 2003 |
bewail 0 (The Previous Word)
----------
moaned 0 (albaugh)
talcum 0 (kip)
teepee 0 (aruba)
----------
rivets 1 (prp)
enamor 0 (aruba)
----------
bemoan 0 (kingjon)
divert 2 (aruba)
----------
dipped 0 (gelinas)
donors 0 (aruba)
superb 2 (kip)
----------
simple 0 (gelinas)
purest 3 (kip)
sweets 1 (prp)
----------
lucent 6 (kip) ---> Ding! Ding! Ding! Winner!
pureed 2 (kingjon)
bevies 0 (prp)
----------
Your word, again, kip!
Lucent \Lu"cent\, a. [L. lucens, p. pr. of lucere to shine, fr.
lux, lucis, light.]
Shining; bright; resplendent. `` The sun's lucent orb.''
--Milton.
|
kip
|
|
response 212 of 1013:
|
May 29 16:38 UTC 2003 |
I'm thinking of a 6-letter word in mind and it is not:
lucent 0 (The Previous Word)
A summary of guesses is in ~kip/letter.match6 and this item.
|
kentn
|
|
response 213 of 1013:
|
May 29 23:27 UTC 2003 |
unease
|
kip
|
|
response 214 of 1013:
|
May 30 02:40 UTC 2003 |
lucent 0 (The Previous Word)
---------
unease 0 kentn
---------
|
aruba
|
|
response 215 of 1013:
|
May 30 03:42 UTC 2003 |
eerier
|
kentn
|
|
response 216 of 1013:
|
May 30 11:18 UTC 2003 |
series
|
kip
|
|
response 217 of 1013:
|
May 30 15:00 UTC 2003 |
lucent 0 (The Previous Word)
---------
unease 0 kentn
---------
errier 0 aruba
series 0 kentn
---------
|
gelinas
|
|
response 218 of 1013:
|
May 30 21:59 UTC 2003 |
Uh... aruba guessed "eerier" in #215, but you scored "errier" in #217, kp.
jumper
|
aruba
|
|
response 219 of 1013:
|
May 30 23:02 UTC 2003 |
Well, I think we can deduce that eerier would have gotten a 0 too.
abacus
|
kentn
|
|
response 220 of 1013:
|
May 30 23:07 UTC 2003 |
blurry
|
prp
|
|
response 221 of 1013:
|
May 31 18:22 UTC 2003 |
rotten
|
kip
|
|
response 222 of 1013:
|
Jun 2 12:10 UTC 2003 |
Yes, given that series got a zero, you can safely assume that eerier would
get a 0 as well. Thanks for pointing out the error. I'll leave the incorrect
guess in as it does give you a bit more information.
lucent 0 (The Previous Word)
---------
unease 0 kentn
---------
errier 0 aruba
series 0 kentn
---------
jumper 1 gelinas
abacus 0 aruba
blurry 0 kentn
rotten 1 prp
---------
|
aruba
|
|
response 223 of 1013:
|
Jun 2 14:51 UTC 2003 |
banana
|
albaugh
|
|
response 224 of 1013:
|
Jun 2 18:16 UTC 2003 |
fruity
|