|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 108 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 20 of 108:
| 
Feb 3 03:41 UTC 1998 |
What about hewing and slaying - do you discuss those too?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 21 of 108:
|
Feb 3 03:57 UTC 1998 |
I'm beginning to suspect that cyberkiller just tossed this item out to
get attention, and hasn't been back.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 22 of 108:
|
Feb 3 18:22 UTC 1998 |
And what if he has? Item hijacking is a Grex Specialty (tm).
|
gothgal
|
|
response 23 of 108:
|
Feb 3 18:32 UTC 1998 |
Nopers Dan. They only discusssuspension bondage and medeival torture. Tee hee!
|
remmers
|
|
response 24 of 108:
|
Feb 3 18:51 UTC 1998 |
Re #21: Yep, he said to email him if interested. (At hotmail.com,
of all places.)
|
senna
|
|
response 25 of 108:
|
Feb 3 19:05 UTC 1998 |
Heh :)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 26 of 108:
|
Feb 3 19:34 UTC 1998 |
In fact, qpqpa hasn't been back since 1/31, the date he first logged on.
|
remmers
|
|
response 27 of 108:
|
Feb 3 23:05 UTC 1998 |
I doubt this item generated much mail. Grex doesn't impress me as
a hacker hangout in the sense that qpqpa probably means.
|
darkal
|
|
response 28 of 108:
|
Feb 7 10:27 UTC 1998 |
Well, well....hacking is hacking...no doubt about that...baut an Hotmail man
who knows how to hack...yeah sure...
|
raven
|
|
response 29 of 108:
|
Feb 7 18:24 UTC 1998 |
re # 28 Tautology is the cheapest currency of truth.
|
redster
|
|
response 30 of 108:
|
Feb 7 23:46 UTC 1998 |
1: any one know a way into Archangel's website
|
wolfg676
|
|
response 31 of 108:
|
Feb 8 03:47 UTC 1998 |
Ask Apocalypse or Professor X. ;)
|
icybyte
|
|
response 32 of 108:
|
Feb 16 08:11 UTC 1998 |
Hmmm, I liked the above definition of a 'hack' by Kevin A...hacking isn't just
with 'puters...it's with ANYTHING in life...yes, to make something do what
it was not advertised to do...that's my philosphy..."hack a coffee machine"...
why? maybe it's broken and u don't wanna pay the $$$ to get it repaired.. so
hack da bizatch...maybe i'll work even better this time around and dispense
a cigerette to go with yer coffee ;D
er, 2 lines up...i meant "maybe it'll work'
|
silvakow
|
|
response 33 of 108:
|
Feb 16 15:21 UTC 1998 |
In response to message 13, I have "connections" with the hacking community.
Hackers are *highly* technical. The only reason I know so much about unix
is becuase I was interested in hacking. I transformed my win95 box into
a linux box becuase I was interested in hacking and I wanted to move foreward.
I'm glad I had an initial interest in hacking, becuase I like *nix much better
than win32 and I'd never know what it was unless I had looked into hacking...
Yeah, I'm still a teenage punk kid who's probly gonna get himself into lots
of trouble, but if you know what yer doing you won't harm *anything* and
you may even avoid getting caught. Don't bash the hacking community, they
are the ones who shaped the internet (yes, Steve Jobs was a hacker, too).
Don't generalize hackers, it's discrimination.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 34 of 108:
|
Feb 16 17:21 UTC 1998 |
OTOH, being a "hack" is a disparaging designation, e.g. a "hack writer".
While being a "crack" is a good thing, e.g. a "crack engineer". Except
for a "crackpot"! ;-)
|
mcnally
|
|
response 35 of 108:
|
Feb 16 18:26 UTC 1998 |
re #33: working as a professional Unix system administrator for a number
of years I can say that the majority of self-styled "hackers" I found trying
to get onto our systems were *not* technically skilled people but for the
most part had downloaded some security-testing software and an exploit kit
from some guy's site and then went bouncing around the Internet in a semi-
random fashion looking for hosts they could get into with their cookbook
solutions -- *none* of the ones I encountered showed any real initiative..
Certainly there are technically clever people out there, the "real" hackers
if you will, but the majority of people who claim that name don't really
know what they're doing and most don't even know why their tricks work..
|
other
|
|
response 36 of 108:
|
Feb 17 14:26 UTC 1998 |
the same could probably be said of system administrators. (nothing personal
mcnally) or, for that matter, people in any other field of endeavour. most
are just following a pattern someone else established, and don't know why it
works, if it works at all.
|
silvakow
|
|
response 37 of 108:
|
Feb 17 16:25 UTC 1998 |
re #35: Hacking with programs, also called "hack in a box," can not be
considered hacking. Hacking means a lot more about being technically skilled
then it means about breaking into systems.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 38 of 108:
|
Feb 17 17:53 UTC 1998 |
yes, it does, but most of the people who *think* they're way radical
hack3r d00dz are not significantly removed from the "hack in a box"
crowd.. I'd estimate the ratio is about 20:1 with sysadmins I think
the ratio of paint-by-numbers folks to experienced artists is somewhat
better, more like 5:1 or 4:1..
|
silvakow
|
|
response 39 of 108:
|
Feb 17 21:17 UTC 1998 |
You got something wrong with paint by number artists? I've made some awesome
fingers by that method =)
|
garima
|
|
response 40 of 108:
|
Feb 21 07:15 UTC 1998 |
I think that "cyberkiller" wawnted to *impart* hacking knowledge to
hacker-wanna-be's; I dont think he/she wanted to be taught hacking...
|
lunar
|
|
response 41 of 108:
|
Mar 2 02:51 UTC 1998 |
Is he serious?
|
wolfg676
|
|
response 42 of 108:
|
Mar 2 08:53 UTC 1998 |
Anything in this item is for educational and informational purposes only.
;)
|
vejiita
|
|
response 43 of 108:
|
Mar 3 04:07 UTC 1998 |
What we got here is just 2 to 4 lines of words.....
but it makes up to 43 resp...hundred of lines...and lots of
personal view....sure wolfg676...very educatinal ...indeed...
I think cyberkiller got his/her lesson already...:)
|
mta
|
|
response 44 of 108:
|
Mar 4 18:26 UTC 1998 |
And the lesson is, there isn't anything grexers can't turn in to a lively
conversation. ;)
|
