You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-20   20-26         
 
Author Message
7 new of 26 responses total.
tsty
response 20 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 10:05 UTC 2003

re #17 .. and those things might be ???????
gull
response 21 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 14:00 UTC 2003

Re #17: Interesting.  I didn't know abuse@ was required, thanks.
keesan
response 22 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 20:29 UTC 2003

Today I got back another mail sent to abuse@hyomon.co.kr (or something
similar) from postmaster@ (so I sent the mail back to postmaster asking them
to close their open relay).
tsty
response 23 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 04:42 UTC 2003

btw, (don't know if it's been posted before or not) yahoo has a special
adress for spam:     mail-abuse@yahoo-inc.com    they seem to respond beetter
at that than any other. 
  
maybe it's better automated, but i've never beenhit twice formthe same
spammer (using or faking yahoo) when i send it to that addrs.
keesan
response 24 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 18:48 UTC 2003

I get back immediate responses from sending simply to abuse@yahoo.com and
sometimes they write back saying they took action.
malymi
response 25 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 05:19 UTC 2003

rfc-ignorant.org lists domains that fail to comply with various rfc's.
tsty
response 26 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 08:29 UTC 2003

re #24 .. read that email .. 
 0-20   20-26         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss