You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   174-198   199-223 
 224-236          
 
Author Message
25 new of 236 responses total.
mcnally
response 199 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 00:24 UTC 2007

 However excellent his technical credentials (of which I have no real
 knowledge), I would not support mic's request to be re-added to staff
 after his recent statements -- it's clear to me that he lacks (and
 doesn't even understand the need for) several key attributes.

 Technical people often make the mistake of thinking that technical
 skills are of paramount importance.  I've been guilty in the past of
 making poor choices based on similar assumptions.  But the reality of
 the situation is that when the job is bigger than a one-man job,
 other attributes become more important -- much more important, actually.

 Grex's technology needs, frankly, are fairly modest.  What we really
 need on staff are people with good judgment and people who can work
 well with other people as part of a team.  (That's one reason why I'm
 saddened to see John Remmers resign from staff.)  It's also important,
 I think, for the staff person to be stable, credible, and respected by
 the Grex community.

 I know that it will offend mic to hear this, and I suspect (based on
 his reaction to other recent developments) that he's probably going to
 take it very personally and hold a grudge for a very long time, but I
 think it would be a dreadfully bad idea to restore his staff privileges,
 NOT because of the incident with giving cross root, but because of the
 behavior he's show SINCE then, which has been notably lacking in the
 attributes we want in a staffer -- calm good judgment, ability to get
 along as part of a team, credibility, stability, and respect.
cmcgee
response 200 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 00:29 UTC 2007

re: 196  I think Dan's willingness to make a commitment to being a board
member is worth something.  

I'd like to see Dan on staff again.  He seems to have recognized that his
"thin-skin" responses need to be modulated, and he seems to be willing to work
on that.  
spooked
response 201 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 00:44 UTC 2007

I'm not offended in the least actually.

It is clear that Grex does not want to address the real issues.  I have 
tried, unselfishly, to highlight them.  I was not sticking around for 
personal reasons - I have zilch to gain from being a Grex staffer (a fact 
seemingly lost on many).

Good luck 'working' with STeve, Marcus, and the dynamic-duo arse-patting 
crew.  

You had a choice to move forward - unfortunately you chose to stay with 
the past.  And, that's your choice.  It is sad, but it is one I thought 
you were - as a group - non-visionary enough to make.  

I lose nothing, and you stick with your cuddly status-quo --- the 
wonderful Grex community of non-striving folk.


slynne
response 202 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 01:34 UTC 2007

FWIW, I also think that cross's willingness to be on the board is
something that should be considered. 
gelinas
response 203 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 01:52 UTC 2007

Let's see if he completes his term, eh?
spooked
response 204 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 02:56 UTC 2007

Sweep the truth under the carpet... the nice persian carpet.
cross
response 205 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 03:43 UTC 2007

Regarding #196; Fair enough.

Regarding #203; I plan on it; the only question is whether I get deployed or
reactivated.  If that happens, then all bets are off.  But honestly, that's
not up to me.  :-)
mcnally
response 206 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 04:17 UTC 2007

 re #201:
 > I'm not offended in the least actually.

 Good, if true.  Hold onto that thought, as I've got more to say..
 
 > It is clear that Grex does not want to address the real issues.  I have 
 > tried, unselfishly, to highlight them.  I was not sticking around for 
 > personal reasons - I have zilch to gain from being a Grex staffer (a fact
 > seemingly lost on many).
 > 
 > Good luck 'working' with STeve, Marcus, and the dynamic-duo arse-patting 
 > crew.  
 > 
 > You had a choice to move forward - unfortunately you chose to stay with 
 > the past.  And, that's your choice.  It is sad, but it is one I thought 
 > you were - as a group - non-visionary enough to make.  

 One of the reasons I really wish you'd shut up about this is that I happen
 to agree with you to a limited extent -- I think Grex has a problem with
 its staff culture and now is the time to start doing something about it.
 I'd like to actually have a serious conversation about this, but you're a
 one-man wrecking crew for your own position -- the way you're going about
 arguing in favor of reform is probably the most effective way to ensure
 that nobody takes the reform position seriously.
tod
response 207 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 04:40 UTC 2007

I take it seriously regardless of spooked's venting.  I'm sure most others
don't based on their responses, though.  People are fixated on personalities
and individuals rather than coming up with a fair process for future would-be
staff volunteers.  I'm trying to ignore all the psychoanalyzing everyone is
enjoying only because I think everyone is repeating themselves mostly.  Well,
I don't think Mike is repeating himself.  He's like E.F.Hutton.
cross
response 208 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 05:01 UTC 2007

I've got to agree with Todd here.
spooked
response 209 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 09:56 UTC 2007

Sorry, I like to make myself heard - especially because I know I speak the 
truth.  I will shut up, because as I said I have nothing to gain from 
being on staff.  I was sacrificing myself for the good of Grex, and I hope 
for its sake it wakes up to itself.
jadecat
response 210 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 14:16 UTC 2007

resp:209 Mic, you make a really crappy Martyr.
cmcgee
response 211 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 15:26 UTC 2007

Todd, "most others" who do take it seriously may be behaving like me:  trying
to stay out the fray until mic finishes venting.  
spooked
response 212 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 16:02 UTC 2007

*giggles* I'm not the perfect kitten, Anne - but I try ;)

jadecat
response 213 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 17:20 UTC 2007

resp:212 please, kittens have charm going for them...
tod
response 214 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 18:04 UTC 2007

They sound great.  Give me a sack of em.
spooked
response 215 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 20:16 UTC 2007

*giggles* I can charm, Annie -- it does depend who and when I feel like 
it, though ;)


cmcgee
response 216 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 20:38 UTC 2007

jadecat he thinks you're flirting with him.
spooked
response 217 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 21:02 UTC 2007

cmcgee: you're a psychoanalysing toss 
tod
response 218 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 21:58 UTC 2007

Bad kitty
spooked
response 219 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 22:23 UTC 2007

*purrs*
jadecat
response 220 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 14:16 UTC 2007

resp:216 Eww.
spooked
response 221 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 00:46 UTC 2007

I think Anne knows I'm being sarcastic, and am not flirting with her :)


spooked
response 222 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 00:48 UTC 2007

Now that I have finished venting, does Grex realise that clearly things 
are broken - and, thus, change (for improvement) is necessary?
tod
response 223 of 236: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 06:51 UTC 2007

What were you saying is broken?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   174-198   199-223 
 224-236          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss