You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   169-193   194-218 
 219-241          
 
Author Message
25 new of 241 responses total.
richard
response 194 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:20 UTC 1999

note-- felicia's journey was I believe directed by Atom Egoyan, who
directed the Sweet Hereafter
scott
response 195 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:50 UTC 1999

Rented "Office Space" over the holiday weekend.  Very funny, good take on
current computer cubicle hell jobs.  Much funnier than the commercials for
it promised.


Also went and saw "Sleepy Hollow", the new Tim Burton movie.  Good, gory,
stylish, but don't expect an airtight plot.
remmers
response 196 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 01:53 UTC 1999

Re resp:194 - Yes, "Felicia's Journey" is an Atom Egoyan film, and
displays the same visual flair as "Sweet Hereafter".  I agree with Mary
about Bob Hoskins' performance.  Try to catch this one in a theater; the
creative use of the wide screen to tell a story would be largely lost on
TV.
bmoran
response 197 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 14:30 UTC 1999

Saw Toy Story 2 Sunday night. Very good, I think it's a bit better than
the first one. Pat (now 8) sorta liked it, and cracked up over a few
parts. If you're worried about going by yourself, borrow a few kids and
have a good time.
drewmike
response 198 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 03:34 UTC 1999

My quick take on "Toy Story 2": While the first film was a revolution, this
one really only manages to be an evolution. But that's okay. In the last five
years, Lasseter & Co. have gotten a lot better at what they do. Buster the
Dog, for example, would have been unimaginable not too long ago. It's also
heartening to see that the story wasn't neglected in the mad dash for the
toys. (They certainly could have gotten away with paying it much less
attention. Just ask DreamWorks SKG.) And longtime followers of Pixar's work
will appreciate the nods to the other films in their canon--from the pairing
of the feature with their first short, "Luxo, Jr.", to the flashes of other
Pixar films when the characters channel surf, right down to the inclusion of
Geri as a toy rehabilitator. (I guess he plays chess on the weekends.)
 
On the downside, "Toy Story 2" was originally intended to be
straight-to-video, but was lengthened to be a feature. *Very* occasionally,
it feels it. And am I the only contemporary filmgoer who lacks the Randy
Newman Appreciation Gene? (Hey, Rand. I may not know where the line between
"signature style" and "self parody" is, but you done passed that thing a long
while ago.)
 
I give it... I don't know. An A-minus. 
(Yeah, I know that wasn't exactly "quick".)
mcnally
response 199 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 05:43 UTC 1999

  You're definitely *not* the only one who's genetically unable to
  appreciate Randy Newman.

  Lasseter's feature-length films have been the best computer-generated
  animated films so far but I had more admiration for his short films --
  the level of amazement they create is possibly just too much to sustain
  througout a feature-length piece..  In my opinion his great genius
  is the ability to imbue inanimate objects with human attributes and
  feeling in what seems like a totally natural way.

  The Lasseter work which impresses me most to this day is "Luxo, Jr." --
  I could go through it frame by frame and still never understand how he
  manages to give emotins and expressions to a pair of swing arm lamps
  which are without any face or other human features.  (I'm similarly
  fascinated by the amount of expression Nick Parks can give to claymation
  figures without mouths, but Lasseter is the master..)


gull
response 200 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 15:25 UTC 1999

I've loved "Luxo, Jr." ever since I saw it running as a short on
Nickelodeon.  (This was back before they started running commercials, as
hard as that may be for some to imagine...)
flem
response 201 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 17:24 UTC 1999

_End of Days_:  B.  Not a bad flick, all told, so long as your 
expectations are low.  Just remember:  Arnold Schwartzenneger plays a 
role in it.  That should put it in the proper context:  comedy without 
meaning to be.  :)  I don't remember making that many snide comments at 
a movie, or laughing so hard at them, in a long time.  :)  
  One particularly interesting point is that the guy who plays the 
devil, the spelling of whose name I can't remember, was in _Stigmata_ as 
essentially the opposite character.  Very similar plots, similar kinds 
of imagery (at least on the surface), but in this one he's the good guy 
protecting the innocent female victim.  IMO, Stigmata was by far the 
better movie.  It would make an interesting movie night someday to get 
both of them and watch them back-to-back for comparison.  
mcnally
response 202 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 22:53 UTC 1999

  (I think you're talking about Gabriel Byrne..)

  "IMO, Stigmata was, by far, the better movie.."  Now *there's* something
  you don't hear every day.
flem
response 203 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 00:24 UTC 1999

Well, I suppose...   I liked it, though, probably better than most people
would, but still.  :)
mary
response 204 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 10:44 UTC 1999

I've had a sweet spot for Schwartzenneger ever since "Conan the
Barbarian".  I love that movie.  So I'll probably see "End of Days"
before it's off the big screens.
scott
response 205 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 12:52 UTC 1999

Dammit, when is "Sixth Sense" going to drop to Fox Theater?  
mcnally
response 206 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 14:45 UTC 1999

  good question..  I've been wondering much the same thing..
richard
response 207 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 23:02 UTC 1999

"LIBERTY HEIGHTS"-- This is the fourth, and supposedly final, 
installment in director Barry Levinson's acclaimed "Baltimore" series, 
depicting life in Baltimore in the 1950's.  The others, all great films, 
were TIN MEN, DINER, and AVALON.  This one is just as good.  

It tells the story of a jewish nightclub owner, played by Joe Montegna, 
who has to reconcile his occupation with the normal, religiously 
grounded life he wants to provide his wife (played by Bebe Neuwirth of 
Cheers) and sons.  They live in the jewish community of Liberty Heights.

The film explores the racial and class issues that people of that era 
lived with and dealt with daily.  It is told through the eyes of 
Montegna's youngest son, who is starting to understand how different the 
outside world is from his protected, all-jewish society of Liberty 
Heights.  

Levinson (who also directed "Rain Man") is one of the best directors 
working today and this series of films represents a deeply heartfelt 
tribute to his childhood in Baltimore.  If you loved Avalon or Diner or 
Tin Men, you will love this film.  It is a proper and just conclusion to 
the series.  

LIBERTY HEIGHTS **** (FOUR STARS-- ONE OF BEST FILMS OF THE YEAR)
drewmike
response 208 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 23:03 UTC 1999

(Total drift: I'm pretty sure "Luxo Jr." came out in 1986, and Nickelodeon
started running ads two years before.)
gull
response 209 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 01:49 UTC 1999

Hmm.  Maybe my memory's faulty, then, but I'm almost sure I originally saw
that short on Nickelodeon.
drewmike
response 210 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 03:28 UTC 1999

I'm not saying you didn't... but ads were on their way earlier.
omni
response 211 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 06:18 UTC 1999

  re 307- Sounds like a great film which probably guarantees that Levinson
will again be ignored at the Oscars again. I've always loved his work. The
first one of his movies I saw was "Diner" back when it first came out and I
thought it was boring, but what does a 21 year old know from film? It wasn't
until I came across Tin Men and Avalon that I truly became a fan of his
movies. Now I don't miss anything he directs.

  Movies seen recently (from cable)

   "I Still Know What (your breasts) you did last summer"-
    Class A stinker. I don't know why they bothered, except to give JLH more
exposure, and to try to make her into an actress. 

   "Hud" - 4 star movie from the 60's with Paul Newman as an amoral man in
conflict with his father (Melvyn Douglas). A performances all around. I really
didn't like seeing Newman in this role, but he did well just the same.

  I'm looking forward to seeing "The Sea Wolf" with Edward G. Robinson. I saw
the version with Chris Reeve and Charles Bronson, and it was great. I just
know that Robinson is going to knock it out of the park. I'm also looking
forward to seeing Gone With The Wind in one uncut piece and not chopped to
little bits like it had been presented on Ch 7 a few years ago. That should
be a real treat.
tpryan
response 212 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 20:17 UTC 1999

        Wasn't Gone With the Wind cut into two parts for release at the 
theatures to have an intermission?
        I need to watch my DVD of it when I find the 4 hour evening to
do it.
omni
response 213 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 09:01 UTC 1999

  Yup. I never liked or supported cutting movies for intermissions.
sno
response 214 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 18:47 UTC 1999

Some people have to pee more often than others, especially after coffee.

gull
response 215 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 22:30 UTC 1999

Or a large Coke.
md
response 216 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 23:54 UTC 1999

Recent rentals starring Catherine Zeta-Jones:

ENTRAPMENT (B+) - I was pleasantly surprised.
The action sequences were excellent -- some
real nail-biter scenes.  Zeta-Jones and Sean
Connery are not a matched set, however, which
dragged the movie down whenever one of them
wasn't being shot at or dangling over an abyss.

THE HAUNTING (C-) - Boring, silly, unscary.  The
house was really, really cool, however.
md
response 217 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 23:59 UTC 1999

London tabloids are reporting that Jennifer
Lopez has insured her body for $1,000,000,000
(one billion dollars).  "$500,000,000 per
cheek," as the N.Y. Post observed.  That is
one insurance policy I would love to see.
bruin
response 218 of 241: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 00:16 UTC 1999

BTW, I do believe that in England, the insured value of Jennifer Lopez's body
would be "one thousand million dollars," and a "billion" would be "one million
million."
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   169-193   194-218 
 219-241          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss