You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   165-189   190-214 
 215-229          
 
Author Message
25 new of 229 responses total.
aaron
response 190 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:01 UTC 2000

Any "masterpiece" that must be studied over and over again to be appreciated
is unlikely to ever gain widespread recognition as a "masterpiece," no
matter how adored it may be by those who take the time to study it.
flem
response 191 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:08 UTC 2000

Perhaps.  On the other hand, there are a great many "masterpieces" that never
achieve widespread recognition except among specialists.  
aaron
response 192 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:14 UTC 2000

Any that the typical person cares about? ;)
void
response 193 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:22 UTC 2000

   drift: does anyone else find it disturbing that the census
commercial showing various school rooms and the numbers of students
they were built to hold/currently hold uses the same beethoven
recording which was used in "a clockwork orange" when alex was
undergoing the ludovico treatment and being shown films?
other
response 194 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:28 UTC 2000

disturbing?  i didn't notice, but now that you mention it, i find it very
amusing, actually.
jazz
response 195 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 01:28 UTC 2000

        I'm a fan of many of Kubricks' films, and I really didn't think that
there was all that much to Eyes Wide Shut, either.  Perhaps someone who did
like it might explain what they liked about it, so that I might benefit from
a deeper appreciation?
remmers
response 196 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 12:41 UTC 2000

Re resp:190 et seq:  Don't neglect the effect of advocacy.
Not *everybody* has to study a work over and over again.
If a few do, and those few publish their opinions, this
can over time change public perceptions.  Various Hitchcock
films have been elevated to "masterpiece" status in this
way, for example.
md
response 197 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 15:41 UTC 2000

Some things I liked about EWS:

The exploitation of various societal strata.  Dr Harford
and his wife are first presented as a couple of rich and 
wordly New Yorkers, invited to the best parties, collectors
of art, all-around BPs.  Then, as they are exposed to people
from other social and economic levels, we see a prostitute
more beautiful -- inside and out -- than either of them; 
and, in the end, we get Ziegler's comment to Harford that 
Harford was immediately identified as an outsider at the 
orgy because, "you arrived in a cab, and everyone else came 
in a limo."  

The first and least effective example of this is the oily 
Hungarian who tries to hit on Alice at Ziegler's big party.  
We're meant to think of him as an aristocratic European taking 
advantage of the silly naive American girl we'd been taking 
for an upper-class sophisticate just two minutes ago.  
Unfortunately, not only does Kubrick ruin it by making Kidman 
too drunk for her coy giggles to mean anything, but also the 
Hungarian himself is first cousin to Zoltan Carpathy, that 
figure of fun who "oozes charm from every pore as he oils his 
way around the floor" trying and failing to unmask Eliza 
Doolittle at the Embassy Ball in "My Fair Lady."  It's 
practically the same guy.  But a director like Kubrick can't
possibly have done something like this by accident, so maybe
the message is: *even* a Zoltan Carpathy can knock over a
ditz like Alice.

The last scene between the Harfords has been justly criticized, 
even by the movie's admirers, for some really dreadful writing.  
But the very last word of the movie is right on the money.  The 
way couples trying to be faithful to each other can deal with the 
kinds of temptations the Harfords have been agonizing pointlessly 
over is -- to be faithful to each other.  When Nicole Kidman says 
the word "fuck," you feel like saying, "THANK you!"  For more 
than two hours, it looked like they'd ever figure it out.  The 
fact that Kubrick presented it as if it were some great final 
illumination is symptomatic of the over-all puerility of the movie, 
however.

I like the general idea, if not its execution in EWS, of the
director making ironic little comments, visible only to the
audience.  The NY Post headline "LUCKY TO BE ALIVE" is one obvious 
(too obvious) example.  The various references to Kubrick, his
family, and his other movies scattered throughout EWS is another.  
There is an undeniably so-what quality to all of this, but it 
helped pass the time, at least for me.
jazz
response 198 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 15:49 UTC 2000

        I'd thought the "LUCKY TO BE ALIVE" headline was a bit corny in that
context;  in a movie that was less realistically shot, it might've worked
quite well.

        It also occured to me that whomever was writing the film had some
seriously confused ideas about the ritual magic and bondage communities, and
sex clubs.  
danr
response 199 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 18:46 UTC 2000

Sweet and Lowdown
2.5 stars out of 4

Sean Penn is really great in this movie, but about every ten minutes or so the
movie is interrupted by Woody Allen and some other folks supposedly
knowledgeable about Emmet Ray to tell stories. These interruptions really
prevented you from really getting into the movie, imho.  And sometimes when
Woody was on it was almost as if he couldn't bear to make a movie in which he
didn't appear.
flem
response 200 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 20:31 UTC 2000

I have a fond place in my heart for Sweet and Lowdown, not because I 
enjoyed the movie so much (though I did rather like it), but because 
after walking out, I had such an urge to go listen to some jazz music 
that I went to the Bird of Paradise for the first time.  I'm rather 
quickly becoming a regular there.  :)
richard
response 201 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 20:57 UTC 2000

Remember, Citizen Kane was panned when it first came out-- Orson Welles
didnt even get nominated for best director, best actor, or best picture.
Like fine wine, good films age well with time-- maybe it didnt win any
academy awards, or even get nominated, but Welles' film is now widely
considered the greatest american film ever made.  People just had to
watch it a few times ya know....same thing with Kubrick
md
response 202 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 22:34 UTC 2000

When Citizen Kane first came out, Borges predicted
that it would be recognized as a masterpiece, but 
that not many people would want to actually sit 
through it again.  A nice disinction.  Maybe EWS
will turn out that way, too.
otter
response 203 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 23:01 UTC 2000

Back to resp:172 for just a sec...
In several real-life agencies, designators and working names are passed 
on as people quit, transfer, die, retire. So, agent 007 is always called 
James Bond, no matter who happens to be doing that job at any given time.
In at least one American agency, teams of people who work together all 
have the same working first name; you have Mike team, Bill team, Tim 
team, etc.
Honest.
remmers
response 204 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 00:15 UTC 2000

Hm, Borges blew it.  I've seen "Citizen Kane" a few times, anyway.
Would like to see EWS again too...
jep
response 205 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 02:38 UTC 2000

We saw "The Tigger Movie" again at the #2/ticket Clinton theater.  It 
kept my wife and I awake, and greatly entertained the kids.  It also 
sold out the Clinton theater on Friday night (216 seats).  By 
obervation, I'd say they had good crowds for the Saturday and Sunday 
night showings as well.
katie
response 206 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 02:43 UTC 2000

I thoroughly enjoyed "Wonder Boys" last night.  Am wondering, tho, why
Robert Downey, Jr was allowed to leave prison to make it.
mcnally
response 207 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 03:37 UTC 2000

  Because of its strong anti-substance-abuse message?

  saw "The Beach" at The Harbor, the cheapie theater in Muskegon,
  on Friday.

  it was, ummm, interesting..  Not totally unredeemable, but it Had
  Serious Problems.  I'd give it a C+   After "Trainspotting" I was
  expecting more from director Danny Boyle..
mary
response 208 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 11:39 UTC 2000

"Mission to Mars" is a Tom Hanks movie without Tom Hanks.
Take the kids.
md
response 209 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 11:58 UTC 2000

That we will.

We went and saw THE CIDER HOUSE RULES (B) in an 
effort to catch up on our Oscar nominees.  It's
a very nice movie.  John Irving tends to let his
plots and characters lead him where they will, 
which can make for a pleasingly random ride.  
The movie was shot, I'm told, largely in western
Massachusetts where I grew up.  Michael Cain is
excellent.
otaking
response 210 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 16:44 UTC 2000

I saw FANTASIA 2000 on Saturday. It's a great movie that I highly recommend.
The mix of art and classical music was superb. In particular, I loved the
animation with the whales (unfortunately, I can't remember the music that
accompanied it), Rhapsody in Blue, and The Firebird. The latter in particulr
was beautiful.

Watching "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" showed the vast difference between
61-year-old 35mm film and new IMAX 15/70mm film. The old film looked grainy
in comparison to the rest of the film. Despite that, I still loved watchin
it on a big screen.

If you see it at the IMAX theater at Greenfield Village, be sure to stick
around for the tour of the projection booth after the show. It's a neat behind
the scenes look.
richard
response 211 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 18:02 UTC 2000

robert downey is a great actor, if he can get day leave from his prison
home to do films, why not? *shrug*
mcnally
response 212 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 20:42 UTC 2000

  The question wasn't "why would RD jr leave prison to do a film?"
  but "why would he be *allowed* to leave to do a film?"

  Although I like his work, it still pisses me off to see the justice
  system bend over backwards to accomodate the rich and famous.  If he
  were a bricklayer or an office worker who was in prison as a repeat
  drug offender would he recieve the same treatment?  I doubt it, even
  if his family's livelihood depended on it..
rcurl
response 213 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 21:55 UTC 2000

Re #210: van Gogh looks grainy too. 
albaugh
response 214 of 229: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 22:03 UTC 2000

Saw "Stuart Little" last night with the family at Plymouth's Penn Theatre.
Nice little family flick, everything comes out OK in the end (oops, was that
a spoiler? ;-) and no animals were harmed in the making of the film (unless
you consider cats falling into the river and dragging themselves out
bedraggled to be punishment instead of fit punishment! :-)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   165-189   190-214 
 215-229          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss