|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 115 responses total. |
jmsaul
|
|
response 19 of 115:
| 
Mar 6 16:46 UTC 2002 |
They just look like that kind of generic story.
|
jazz
|
|
response 20 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:58 UTC 2002 |
True; it definitely doesn't sound like real reports from the field.
|
brighn
|
|
response 21 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:59 UTC 2002 |
#16 has a personalized paragraph at the beginning, FWIW. OTOH, I think it's
offensive to come in here and say, "Oh, the new people are SO wonderful
because they're posting things *I* want to read, and you people who have been
here for YEARS and who are talking about things you want to talk about? YOU
SUCK! How dare you talk about things YOU enjoy in YOUR conf?"
|
jazz
|
|
response 22 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:36 UTC 2002 |
Well, it's not all that strange when you consider they're all the same
person. You don't need to do the actual legwork on this one, either -
they've all got unusual online habits and characteristic phrasing, which
suggests that it's not even three people who know each other, but one person.
|
phenix
|
|
response 23 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:37 UTC 2002 |
ok. what exactly is the problem here?
your local fw has lost track of what the argument's over.
also, if i DO find that these stories are plagerized i WILL freeze
this item, notify the original authors and give them the posters
ip.
i will also post something to this effect in the item so that it's not some
random freeze thing.
|
jazz
|
|
response 24 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:38 UTC 2002 |
This is a situation that calls for good old-fashioned skepticism and
gentle guiding into active participation, not a bazooka ... :)
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 25 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:48 UTC 2002 |
No kidding. Or just good old-fashioned ignoring of posts you aren't
interested in.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 26 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:49 UTC 2002 |
And hang on a minute -- why would you want to freeze the item if #0 is
"plagiarized"?
That wouldn't stop people from reading the "plagiarized" text, it would
just stop us from talking about it, which is pointless and silly. LIke
trying to require posts in the sex.cf that include sex stories to bear the
label "pornography -- warning, evil".
|
brighn
|
|
response 27 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:57 UTC 2002 |
I'm seeing Greg act in an unusual way in this item. Are you having a bad week,
Greg? I mean, sure, this is a weird item, and worth hostility, but not THIS
much hostility.
|
phenix
|
|
response 28 of 115:
|
Mar 6 19:57 UTC 2002 |
plagarism pisses me off, if I have proff of it, and i could, i'd wipe the posts
but grex does not allow me to do that. i accept that.
*IF* i recieve proof of plagarism, the item will be frozen, and people
are more than welcome to start a new item talking about the issue.
and #0 is not what's at issue, it's the varying unoriginal trite stories
in this item.
(note unoriginal not in the sense of someone else's work, just unoriginal
as in totally dirivitive net pr0n)
and how is this unusual/hostile?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 29 of 115:
|
Mar 6 21:09 UTC 2002 |
I dunno if it's unusual, but denying us the ability to comment on the boring
stories won't stop the guy from posting them, now will it?
|
oval
|
|
response 30 of 115:
|
Mar 6 23:01 UTC 2002 |
don't people *talk* during sex? or do they just say 'fuck me' , 'come in my
face', etc. i mean seriously people. total lack of creativity.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 31 of 115:
|
Mar 6 23:28 UTC 2002 |
Yep. Those stories should stand as a warning to others that even sex can be
made insipid.
|
phenix
|
|
response 32 of 115:
|
Mar 6 23:37 UTC 2002 |
i try not to talk during sex after the unfortunate Name incident
|
jazz
|
|
response 33 of 115:
|
Mar 7 01:52 UTC 2002 |
You invoked a demon during? Yikes.
|
phenix
|
|
response 34 of 115:
|
Mar 7 02:19 UTC 2002 |
worse, called current so by previous so's name who just came back
into town
|
jazz
|
|
response 35 of 115:
|
Mar 7 02:35 UTC 2002 |
Oh shit, that's an offense they used to draw and quarter people for.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 36 of 115:
|
Mar 7 02:43 UTC 2002 |
Same thing as #33, really.
|
phenix
|
|
response 37 of 115:
|
Mar 7 03:14 UTC 2002 |
well, possesion wasn't QUITE the reaction, and at least i'm still in one piece
|
jazz
|
|
response 38 of 115:
|
Mar 7 03:47 UTC 2002 |
You got lucky.
I was camping out in the northern lip of the lower penninsula with a
girl, and on the third day she called me by her ex-boyfriend's name. I
didn't really mind. She'd been camping with him a million times, and me
once, and had been together with him for years. Accordingly, I fixed her
with a steely eye and wouldn't talk to her for an hour.
|
jazz
|
|
response 39 of 115:
|
Mar 7 16:39 UTC 2002 |
Okay, now this pissed me off.
From: jack ulation <cum@cyberspace.org>
Subject: thank you
To: jazz@grex.org
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1020306235442.6645B-100000@grex.cyberspace.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Thank you for your interest in an Item I began in
the Sexuality conference called Hotel Exhibitionism.
#4 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Sun Mar 3 18:06:57 2002:
#6 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Mon Mar 4 21:25:26 2002:
#15 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 01:42:17 2002:
#18 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 11:33:54 2002:
#20 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 11:58:48 2002:
#22 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 12:36:51 2002:
#24 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 12:38:40 2002:
#33 of 33 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 20:52:20 2002:
#35 of 38 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 21:35:51 2002:
#38 of 38 by Silent Tristero (jazz) on Wed Mar 6 22:47:07 2002:
This is evidenced by your TEN RESPONSES !
I hope you'll follow through in the spirit in which
this the conference item was started to create a forum
of shareing of sex play experiences.
Looking forward to hearing about your memorable sex acts
in this item...
jack
Maybe the bazooka isn't called for, but definitely a sharp wedgie.
|
phenix
|
|
response 40 of 115:
|
Mar 7 16:49 UTC 2002 |
i got one of those two.
i'm not really sure what to do aside from issue stern self-grandizing editcs
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 41 of 115:
|
Mar 7 16:50 UTC 2002 |
I'd ignore it.
|
brighn
|
|
response 42 of 115:
|
Mar 7 16:53 UTC 2002 |
Does Grex have any spam policies?
|
phenix
|
|
response 43 of 115:
|
Mar 7 17:06 UTC 2002 |
not yet:)
but ignoring for now seems the wisest course
|