|
Grex > Coop11 > #52: The Destination, and the On-Ramp | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 6 new of 24 responses total. |
tsty
|
|
response 19 of 24:
| 
Dec 26 11:14 UTC 1998 |
re #17, #18 .... welllll, that structure is teh us gooberment's stance
for the war on drugs!! it is wonderfully fascinating (??perverse??) that
two such high-powered intellects take opposite stances on the structure
of gooberment over-reach
or, isolationism ...whichever.
|
mta
|
|
response 20 of 24:
|
Dec 26 15:25 UTC 1998 |
I think one of us read that wrong, TS. I thought John and Steve were in
agreement, more or less.
|
remmers
|
|
response 21 of 24:
|
Dec 26 16:04 UTC 1998 |
I thought we were too.
|
steve
|
|
response 22 of 24:
|
Dec 26 16:40 UTC 1998 |
So did I.
|
tsty
|
|
response 23 of 24:
|
Dec 31 23:37 UTC 1998 |
hmmmm, on second read it does seem that i misread/misenterpreted the
content in #17 & #18 .... i appreiate the pointers and type corrected.
my mistake - sorry.
what i misread was 'which dim view of which dim demand was the object of
which enlightened response.'
if i take it correctly, we/grex would be summarioly uncooperative were
some 'over there' to ask/request/damend that we do their censoring for them.
'censor' here to mean 'refuse access' and keep the 'over there' ppl off grex.
if i have more accurately (and inother words) described #'s 17 & 18 ...
then add my aggreement to each.
|
remmers
|
|
response 24 of 24:
|
Jan 1 15:56 UTC 1999 |
Quite right. What I meant in resp:17 is that Grex shouldn't do other
people's censoring for them.
|