|
Grex > Oldcoop > #25: Nominations for the 2004 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 225 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 189 of 225:
| 
Dec 16 19:09 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 190 of 225:
|
Dec 16 19:21 UTC 2003 |
Thanks to all the candidates - we had a great slate this year, and it's a
shame more people couldn't be elected. Congrats to the winners!
|
jep
|
|
response 191 of 225:
|
Dec 16 21:14 UTC 2003 |
Thanks very much to everyone who ran! I agree with Mark; there was a
terrific slate of candidates and it was hard to choose amongst them.
Congrats to the winners!
|
jep
|
|
response 192 of 225:
|
Dec 16 21:17 UTC 2003 |
I am very interested to see how it works out for bhoward, conferencing
in from Japan.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 193 of 225:
|
Dec 16 22:06 UTC 2003 |
Same here. I hope it works well.
|
bhoward
|
|
response 194 of 225:
|
Dec 16 23:27 UTC 2003 |
Wow! Thanks to everyone who participated in the election. I'm excited
to have this chance to support grex in this role.
A special thanks also to those who cast their votes for me. I'll do my
best to earn the trust you've expressed.
Mahalo! Arigatou gozaimasu! Or as Shakey Jake once said, "Thank you
for your kindly"
|
tod
|
|
response 195 of 225:
|
Dec 16 23:31 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 196 of 225:
|
Dec 16 23:47 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhoward
|
|
response 197 of 225:
|
Dec 16 23:51 UTC 2003 |
Heh.
|
carson
|
|
response 198 of 225:
|
Dec 17 01:37 UTC 2003 |
(as someone who was very disappointed in the slate of candidates,
I am glad to see that my vote did make a difference.)
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 199 of 225:
|
Dec 17 02:58 UTC 2003 |
Holy shit, Bruce. I didn't even know you were running.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 200 of 225:
|
Dec 17 15:15 UTC 2003 |
Re: #198: Why disappointed?
|
polygon
|
|
response 201 of 225:
|
Dec 17 18:41 UTC 2003 |
Thanks to everyone. It should be an interesting two years.
|
carson
|
|
response 202 of 225:
|
Dec 17 19:56 UTC 2003 |
(minor question that I believe has been answered in years past: how many
eligible voters were there, and how many of them voted?)
|
davel
|
|
response 203 of 225:
|
Dec 18 18:45 UTC 2003 |
I believe there are 77 eligible voters, & 46 of them voted. John can correct
me if I'm wrong.
|
jp2
|
|
response 204 of 225:
|
Dec 18 19:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 205 of 225:
|
Dec 18 19:20 UTC 2003 |
It's innocent until proven guilty. I'm not sure it applies to your
situation...
|
carson
|
|
response 206 of 225:
|
Dec 18 19:52 UTC 2003 |
resp:204 (Jamie, Jamie, Jamie... you're a bright boy, but I'll point
out the obvious to you anyway: "member" does not equal
"eligible voter." 3-month rule and all that.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 207 of 225:
|
Dec 18 20:54 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 208 of 225:
|
Dec 18 21:12 UTC 2003 |
I reported all the recent new members in Agora - there has been one since
Jamie sent his mailing. Dave was referring to the number of eligible
voters, which is currently (and was at the end of the election) 79.
|
jp2
|
|
response 209 of 225:
|
Dec 18 21:22 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 210 of 225:
|
Dec 18 21:35 UTC 2003 |
There are 3 reasons a member might not be eligible to vote:
1) because he or she hasn't paid for at least 3 months,
2) because he or she is behind on his or her dues, but still in a grace
period, and
3) because the member is not an idividual but an institution.
|
davel
|
|
response 211 of 225:
|
Dec 19 02:31 UTC 2003 |
Try !members -v | wc instead.
Obviously my memory was not good for a couple of minutes, earlier. I did
this, then wrote a quick script (possibly buggy, so as I said John can correct
my results), & then put in both numbers. But obviously it should have been
79 not 77. <sigh>
|
willcome
|
|
response 212 of 225:
|
Dec 19 03:14 UTC 2003 |
---- janc joining (Dec 18 21:58)
janc: Is it safe to come out?
janc: Under the limit, but over the plan.
---- janc leaving (Dec 18 21:58)
Can you believe it?!
|
aruba
|
|
response 213 of 225:
|
Dec 19 04:14 UTC 2003 |
Actually you can just do !members -v -c . (-c tells it to count the group
instead of listing it.)
|