|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 283 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 187 of 283:
|
Nov 16 13:18 UTC 1997 |
Something like this might be clearer:
Use the "BACK" button on your browser to return to the
form. You can then make changes and resubmit it.
(Of course, the "lynx" browser doesn't really have any
"buttons". People who develop web-based applications really are
at the mercy of browser behavior that they can't control...)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 188 of 283:
|
Nov 17 01:53 UTC 1997 |
"Return to the previous page to edit the form"?
|
remmers
|
|
response 189 of 283:
|
Nov 18 01:03 UTC 1997 |
People might not know how to do that.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 190 of 283:
|
Nov 18 05:04 UTC 1997 |
"Click on "Back" to return....."?
|
scott
|
|
response 191 of 283:
|
Nov 18 12:11 UTC 1997 |
"Use your browser's 'go back' function so you can change your entries"?
|
richard
|
|
response 192 of 283:
|
Nov 18 16:20 UTC 1997 |
Grex is really slooooowwwww this morning. I was #61 on the wait list.
About twenty five or thirty minutes later, I got on, only to have grex
crash (or at least freeze) after reading only one agora item. I
telnetted back, saw I was #57 this time and said the hell with it, and
Im backtalking now.
With this kind of efficiency, maybe the ISDNs were a waste of money.
Grex doesnt need ISDNs help to be this slow!
|
richard
|
|
response 193 of 283:
|
Nov 18 16:20 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
richard
|
|
response 194 of 283:
|
Nov 18 16:21 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
jep
|
|
response 195 of 283:
|
Nov 18 16:48 UTC 1997 |
Backtalk is speedy today. I haven't noticed any major delays; it seems
better than normal to me.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 196 of 283:
|
Nov 19 05:36 UTC 1997 |
HINT: there is almost always a long que in the morning. And more then likely
these people are doing more than just checking mail and etc. Another thing
to keep in mind.... 9-5 is when the internet is almost always busy.
|
valerie
|
|
response 197 of 283:
|
Nov 19 18:01 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
richard
|
|
response 198 of 283:
|
Nov 19 23:12 UTC 1997 |
wait, jan was telnetted in while you were dialed in? You mean you have
*three* phone lines at your place?! guess its necessary in a two computer
household. Admit it now, the relationship wouldnt last if you had to live
together with only one phone line and had to share computer time :)
|
gibson
|
|
response 199 of 283:
|
Nov 20 04:06 UTC 1997 |
when i tried to get on last night 4 or 5 times i would get the top half
of the screen ok then the bottom would be gibberish. i gave up til this
evening and still got the same. i waited about an hour and tried again and
finally got a usable connection.
|
valerie
|
|
response 200 of 283:
|
Nov 20 06:24 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
omni
|
|
response 201 of 283:
|
Nov 20 06:38 UTC 1997 |
Patrick run the change program. There is an option to set your lines and rows
correctly, courtesy of Valerie.
|
headdoc
|
|
response 202 of 283:
|
Nov 21 13:29 UTC 1997 |
I have been having some difficulties in Pine for the past two days. Some of
the owrds and letters I type, don't show up on the screen after I've typed
them. And other funny stuff I cant describe because its too early to
concentrate.
|
valerie
|
|
response 203 of 283:
|
Nov 21 15:17 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 204 of 283:
|
Nov 21 17:27 UTC 1997 |
Re #202: Is it that particular letters never show up in pine
(for example, the letter 'n' never showing up) or does it appear
to be random (sometimes 'n' shows up and sometimes it doesn't)?
|
headdoc
|
|
response 205 of 283:
|
Nov 21 23:50 UTC 1997 |
Well, John, now that I am more alert abd graphically articulate, its working
and I dont recall. It seems like it was random disappearing letters or parts
of words, but I'm not really sure. In addition, after a while, I was getting
letter strings instead of the printed word. But that too, has cleared up.
Thanks to whoever took care of it.
|
valerie
|
|
response 206 of 283:
|
Nov 22 04:14 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 207 of 283:
|
Nov 22 14:24 UTC 1997 |
The last time we had problems like the above with modems was with the newer
models running at 2400. If you make sure your error-correction is on on your
modem, it works much better. There is no configuration thing for this; the
new modems just don't like running with no error-correction.
|
valerie
|
|
response 208 of 283:
|
Nov 22 22:41 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 209 of 283:
|
Nov 23 15:19 UTC 1997 |
I have my terminial emulator (Procomm) take the 14.4 modem
down to 9600 before dialing the 9600 lines, down to 2400 before
dialing the 2400 lines. That seems to give best results for me.
|
tsty
|
|
response 210 of 283:
|
Nov 23 19:16 UTC 1997 |
hmmmm, when is the motd section about spam going to take effect?
Sun Nov 23 14:10:44 EST 1997
[Internet access provided by ICNet, (313) 998-0090.]
>>
>> The auction ends December 6th, so don't wait!
>>
Grex's mail system has been configured to reject mail that claims to come
from systems that don't exist. This should reduce spam. -jdw
From roy@dmr.ca Sat Nov 22 23:53:29 1997
Received: from seralph21.essex.ac.uk (seralph21.essex.ac.uk [155.245.240.171])
by grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA14423 for
<tsty@cyberspace.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 23:53:26 -0500 Received: from serultra0
by seralph21.essex.ac.uk; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Feb95-1154AM)
id AA01188; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 04:49:19 GMT
Received: from mark.netlink.be by serultra0.ac.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id EAA26019; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 04:49:01 GMT
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 04:49:01 GMT
To: lonelyguy@yourisp.com
From: roy@dmr.ca (Lonely? Horny? Call Susan)
Comments: Authenticated sender is <roy@dmr.ca>
Reply-To: janet-smith@usa.net
Errors-To: janet-smith@usa.net
Subject: Horny? Lonely? Free Phone Sex
Message-Id: <199711222920FAA45185@karlp.essex.ac.uk>
<HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000"><FONT COLOR="#00FFFF" SIZE=3>
Phone Sex - For Adults Only
Live Adult Chat Line - One on One
Any topic - No holds Barred
011-592-244-066
011-592-246-350
DO NOT Pay $3.99/minute for Phone Sex
You only pay for the phone call - no other charge
As low as 69 cents/minute
International Long Distance Rates Apply
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3>
^U
|
bmoran
|
|
response 211 of 283:
|
Nov 23 21:10 UTC 1997 |
Don't 'cha just hate those e-mail messages with the <html> tags?
|