You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-18   18-25         
 
Author Message
8 new of 25 responses total.
orinoco
response 18 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 18:10 UTC 1999

I can remember, when I was around 10 and just getting into sci-fi, checking
out a copy of A Clockwork Orange from the library and being told, very calmly,
that I probably wouldn't like it anyway and why don't I find something else
to read.  I don't remember my parents monitoring what I read too closely,
although they probably did and I just didn't notice.  So now I'm trying to
think what would have happened had I been able to read whatever I got my hands
on...    Part of the problem is, I can't imagine growing up any differently
than I have been growing up, so it's hard to picture any sort of "what if"
about my own life.  

I guess what it amounts to is, on the one hand I can't imagine being hugely
altered by a book or two: being a non-violent person, I most likely would have
put down A Clockwork Orange after 10 pages or so even if I could understand
it, and if I had been a more violently inclined person, the book wouldn't be
bringing out anything that wasn't already there.  On the other hand, Everyone
seems to agree that there are things that a 10-year-old shouldn't read, and
I find it hard to believe that Everyone is wrong on this one.
bookworm
response 19 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 04:44 UTC 1999

Depends on the emotional maturity of the ten year old.

Jon was reading the Newspaper at ten and that has lots more violence in 
it than the average novel.

In any case, I still think that if parents want their child not to read 
certain books they should monitor their child's library visits, not try 
to pass laws that restrict books from entering the library.
lilmo
response 20 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 00:06 UTC 1999

Re resp:16 - You are misreading resp:12 but I'm not surprised.  It took
me almost a whole minute, staring at it and resp:10 to figure out what was
said, and I'm the one that wrote it!!  :-)  There seem to be too many canceling
negatives for it to be obvious what was meant.

What I was trying to say was that it seems to be much more likely to be
against the spirit of the law for public libraries to refuse to stock items
than for school libraries to do so.  That is, I think it would be easier to
use the courts to force a public library to carry something than a school
library.  I think that it is clear that children need protection.

Does that make more sense?
bookworm
response 21 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 18:01 UTC 1999

My point exactly, lilmo.  Very well put.
orinoco
response 22 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 22:23 UTC 1999

Ah.  I see.  I must've missed one o' them negatives....
lilmo
response 23 of 25: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:35 UTC 1999

Like I said, I'm not surprised, DV.

Thank you, bookworm.


So, have you read any banned books lately?  :-)
swa
response 24 of 25: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 03:50 UTC 1999

It occurs to me that most of the books I've read that I know have been
banned and frequently censored, I read in my public high school.
Interesting, that.

The only banned book I'm especially planning to read is _The Satanic
Verses_.  I read another Rushdie book that I much enjoyed, and am curious
as to what the fuss is all about with this one.  Not sure if I'll get
around to it anytime soon, though...

lilmo
response 25 of 25: Mark Unseen   Sep 25 01:59 UTC 1999

Well, let us know how it goes, when it does, OK?
 0-18   18-25         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss