|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 241 responses total. |
emblem
|
|
response 175 of 241:
| 
May 19 15:53 UTC 2002 |
i think poeples individual style, red hair, shaved or not, is fine. Peircings,
tatoos, whatever. Who cares how poeple express thewselves in public...poeple
are who they wanna be...ive never been one to poke fun at anybody. Especially
thier sexuality. I have an uncle thats gay and he told me that he wasnt gay
because he didnt find women attactive, but because he had different emotional
needs. He said that he did find women attractive, beauty wise and sexually
as well, but they didnt have what he needed emotionally. I myself am not gay,
but it did help me understand what being gay is about. I know that there are
some gay poeple out there that have very bad opinions about the other sex,
but that is there choice, but i dont make fun of them, i just dont think its
right to make fun of poeple because of who they are, red hair and piercing
or whatever. I guess thats my opinion tho....
its been awhile since anyones been on this conf eh?
|
jazz
|
|
response 176 of 241:
|
May 19 18:05 UTC 2002 |
That's nice, but what I was making fun of in this case was a closeted
mind.
|
senna
|
|
response 177 of 241:
|
May 19 23:43 UTC 2002 |
The "I understand" testimonial item?
|
dono
|
|
response 178 of 241:
|
Oct 7 01:28 UTC 2002 |
exit
|
captin
|
|
response 179 of 241:
|
Oct 18 09:35 UTC 2002 |
nkeeid photo's. where where where????????? ;-)
|
jazz
|
|
response 180 of 241:
|
Oct 18 13:26 UTC 2002 |
... someone didn't read the intro, did they?
|
ludaspit
|
|
response 181 of 241:
|
Oct 28 18:23 UTC 2002 |
hi
|
phenix
|
|
response 182 of 241:
|
Oct 28 18:57 UTC 2002 |
well, at least we know the answer to that question
|
gizlnort
|
|
response 183 of 241:
|
Dec 4 17:09 UTC 2002 |
Howdy all, just peeking in to see the slow moving forum.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 184 of 241:
|
Dec 4 18:52 UTC 2002 |
[insert "spurts of activity" pun here]
|
phenix
|
|
response 185 of 241:
|
Dec 4 19:06 UTC 2002 |
it's more of spasms
|
jazz
|
|
response 186 of 241:
|
Dec 5 14:39 UTC 2002 |
Eww.
|
gizlnort
|
|
response 187 of 241:
|
Dec 5 17:57 UTC 2002 |
Ah, but are they "happy spasms", that is the question.
|
gizlnort
|
|
response 188 of 241:
|
Dec 5 17:58 UTC 2002 |
now we see if the system took my new name
|
jazz
|
|
response 189 of 241:
|
Dec 7 22:11 UTC 2002 |
Doesn't look that way (to the name bit).
|
otter
|
|
response 190 of 241:
|
Jan 11 21:49 UTC 2003 |
Hello, folks!
|
phenix
|
|
response 191 of 241:
|
Jan 12 16:34 UTC 2003 |
morning
|
vidar
|
|
response 192 of 241:
|
Jan 13 19:02 UTC 2003 |
Hi.
|
gizlnort
|
|
response 193 of 241:
|
Jan 14 19:38 UTC 2003 |
YEEEHAH! Beats a regular hello
|
iitk
|
|
response 194 of 241:
|
Mar 3 14:36 UTC 2003 |
Hi
I thought that people talked dirty here,
which I now see is not true..
Why is this so..
I assume all of u would be interested in that..at
some point..
So why the fake decency that is prevailing here..?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 195 of 241:
|
Mar 3 20:31 UTC 2003 |
This is the public part of the conference. If you want to talk dirty,
type "!stty 0" at the Ok: prompt.
I promise you you'll be encouraged!
|
jazz
|
|
response 196 of 241:
|
Mar 3 22:45 UTC 2003 |
Heh.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 197 of 241:
|
Mar 9 19:03 UTC 2003 |
I guess everyone's been trying it. ;-)
|
gizlnort
|
|
response 198 of 241:
|
Mar 17 15:35 UTC 2003 |
Cute, very cute. Useful to know Joe too...thanks for letting me in on the
secret.
s.
|
jazz
|
|
response 199 of 241:
|
Mar 17 22:29 UTC 2003 |
I don't think he "let you in" on it ...
|