You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-211 
 
Author Message
25 new of 211 responses total.
valerie
response 175 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 29 16:50 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

dpc
response 176 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 29 19:23 UTC 1997

Well, how about running a "conference-file-checking" command on only
a small *sample* of users?
        My surmise is that Grex usage is split into two relatively
non-overlapping categories:  A small number of mostly local users
who are active in the conferences, and a huge number of mostly
out-of-Michigan users who use us as an E-mail/Internet server.
        I'm just looking for some empirical data to support my
surmise. 8-)
kaplan
response 177 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 29 21:03 UTC 1997

I take back what I said in #174.  It seems that from inside the firewall here
at work, I can't telnet to anything pop3.
valerie
response 178 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 29 23:16 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 179 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 30 05:37 UTC 1997

A smaller percentage of users even try bbs now, than earlier?
valerie
response 180 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 30 13:19 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 181 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 30 16:02 UTC 1997

I would not be surprised if a number of users run bbs once and find it
initially frustrating, and don't go back.
atticus
response 182 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 30 16:39 UTC 1997

re #180 : I agree. I had never tried running bbs before last week. Now
I see how much I have missed.

re #181 : I don't agree. It was a wonderful experience. Nothing
frustrating about it.
rcurl
response 183 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 30 20:22 UTC 1997

Well, obviously, I don't agree either! But I was speaking about you, atticus,
in #181. :)
dpc
response 184 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 00:33 UTC 1997

Good show, Valerie!!  That's a much higher percentage than I thought.
        Hm.  Would it be possible to send those people who have *not*
tried bbs an e-mail message suggesting that they do so, with easy-
to-follow directions?
atticus
response 185 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 01:00 UTC 1997

On 'telnet' links from outside the States, it might be difficult to run 'bbs'
during the daytime. At least, it is the case with me. When I try 'bbs'
the connection gets closed :) So to access 'bbs', I have to stay up till 
11:30 in the night. I think that may be one of the reasons why people
(at least those like me) don't try 'bbs'. 
valerie
response 186 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 05:01 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

atticus
response 187 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 07:08 UTC 1997

I don't think it is the idle zapper (I am assuming that the idle zapper
is the one which warns me sometimes that I am going to be logged out in
another 5 minutes :-)) The problem is something like this: when I run
'bbs', after the welcome banner, I get a message "Connection closed by
foreign host". I have a narrow dial-up link towards the router; the link is
shared by many. Can this be a reason? This usually happens only in case of
'bbs'. Also, this does not happen when the traffic is low -- in the night,
or on Sundays. I don't think that this is a problem with Grex; most probably
something to do with my link.
mary
response 188 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 12:24 UTC 1997

I'm not sure how much longer it will be playing but 
the current production at The Purple Rose Theater,
Hot L Baltimore, is the best of what I've seen there.
The actors do a wonderful job with some well written
material.  If you want to make extra-certain the 
evening is enjoyable have dinner first at The Common
Grill.  It's what's known as a Chelsea evening. ;-)
atticus
response 189 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 14:57 UTC 1997

re #187: I used 'backtalk' for the first time today. I think that will
solve my 'bbs' woes since there is no question of a closed connection
here. If we are
going to attract people to conferences, I feel 'backtalk' should be
given more 
publicity.

BTW, is it possible to run a shell command (on Grex) while I am in
'backtalk'?
valerie
response 190 of 211: Mark Unseen   May 31 18:14 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

scg
response 191 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 04:08 UTC 1997

Well, assuming your computer will run your web browser and a telnet client
at the same time, you could have a shell open and be in backtalk.  The problem
with that is that then that uses up a pty that could be used by somebody else.

It sounds like you are effectively duplicating Grex's Internet connection on
your end.  Grex is also on a 28.8 modem and pushing way more load through it
than a 28.8 should really be able to handle.  Having connections like that
on both ends must create some pretty impressive lag.  What telnet client are
you using?  On the reare occasions when I use a Macintosh, I sometimes find
that Grex's netlag is enough to make NCSA Telnet for the Mac time out and
close the connection.
valerie
response 192 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 04:46 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

senna
response 193 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 17:20 UTC 1997

Most people in bbs are either old users who've been bbsing for a long time
or old users (like me) who started more recently.  A huge majority of grex
social traffic runs in party.
atticus
response 194 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 17:40 UTC 1997

re #191: I am using an HP workstation running HP-UX 9.0. The 'telnet'
is the one in the standard distribution.
srw
response 195 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 18:44 UTC 1997

I think Valerie must have misunderstood your question, atticus. You 
certainly can have a shell open on Grex in a telnet session while also 
using backtalk over the web. 

I agree with STeve that if you are going to conference via backtalk it 
is courteous not to tie up a pty, unless you are actively using it as 
well.

I have even run picospan and backtalk at the same time, but I warn you 
not to do this in the same conference, because picospan caches its copy 
of the participation file and Backtalk does not. Your participation file 
would be at risk.

I can think of nothing that would cause the telnet connection to be 
broken by starting up bbs. That's a new one on me. Does this happen 
every time, or only when it is slow?
remmers
response 196 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 22:12 UTC 1997

(It so happens that I have a telnet shell session open to Grex
at this very moment while using backtalk at the same time...)
atticus
response 197 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 00:59 UTC 1997

Valerie did understand my problem -- what I wanted to know was whether
I could run some shell or shell-like thing *from my backtalk session*.
For example, 'finger' is already there as a link from the user name
when using backtalk. Currently I am using the two-session solution
when I want to 'tel' people while I am using the bbs.

I am afraid I've already tried out running picospan and backtalk at
the same time. I guess I was lucky since nothing seems to have 
happened to my participation file.

Regarding broken telnets, it happens only when the traffic is high.
Is there any chance that if the traffic is high, the telnet client
will start losing packets sent from the daemon and after a while
time out and exit? We have to onsider that when 'bbs' is started
a lot of characters are suddenly pumped on to the screen as against 
a non-bbs session where I will be mostly using 'party' or 'tel'.
remmers
response 198 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 12:34 UTC 1997

Shell-like operations would be available from Backtalk only to the
extent that the designers of Backtalk and its interfaces choose to
make them available. Currently, you can't do much in the way of
shell-like operations from Backtalk. I'm not faulting the authors of
Backtalk for that; it was their goal to provide a conferencing
interface via the web, not a full interface to all the facilities of
Grex.

However, it is a bit worrisome to me that just about all you can do
on Grex via the web is conferencing, because it means that as internet
usage shifts towards the web and away from the older-style telnet
interface, we may lose something of what makes Grex uniquely Grex.
Conferencing forums on the web are getting to be a dime a dozen, but
I think that the mixture of services that you can get with a traditional
interface -- conferencing, real-time chat, mail, full access to Unix,
all rolled into one package -- have facilitated the kind of community-
building that makes Grex so special.

Sorry for the philosophical digression. I guess this is the
"Announcements about Grex" item.
valerie
response 199 of 211: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 23:27 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-211 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss